訊息原文

1 人回報1 則回應6 年前
重要消息,請轉告好友們:
多數日本人開始準備要移民,為什麼?

Dear Charles:

Good evening.

The total area from the radioactive contamination is measured 3,000 square kilometers with a potentially quarantine ar239ea is measured to be 13,000 square kilometers.

There were four reactors was destroyed from the tsunami and the inside fuel rods were totally melt down without any way to remove them from these 4 crippled reactors.

As matter of fact, all these 4 reactors had been totally melt through and the nuclear fuels has been punctured the 4-inch thick steel outer shell.

Furthermore, those 4 reactors generate 300 tons of highly radioactive contaminated water.

The owner of these reactors, the TEPCO, STORED THESE HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE WATER in plastic drums and over the year, a lot of those 55-gal plastic drums developed leakage.

Japan government simply allow those leaked highly radioactive water drained into the Pacific Ocean.

The very reason that US has not opposing this highly radioactive water into the ocean...

現有回應

  • Lin標記此篇為:❌ 含有不實訊息

    理由

    假的,日本目前並無大量土地遭輻射汙染之情形。福島縣內的各個自治團體,不斷進行去除放射性物質銫的除污作業。放射性銫因本身也有半衰期(銫134約2年、銫137約30年),與事故剛發生當時比較起來已減少了許多。現在福島縣居住空間的輻射劑量已相當有限,空氣中不存在放射性銫,所以也不會因呼

    出處

    http://www.tif.ne.jp/lang/tc/radioactivity_map/index.php
    福島縣
    6 年前
    10

增加新回應

  • 撰寫回應
  • 使用相關回應 10
  • 搜尋

你可能也會對這些類似文章有興趣

  • 重要消息,請轉告好友們 - 多數日本人開始研究要移民,為什麼? Dear Charles: Good evening. The total area from the radioactive contamination is measured 3,000 square kilometers with a potentially quarantine ar239ea is measured to be 13,000 square kilometers. There were four reactors was destroyed from the tsunami and the inside fuel rods were totally melt down without any way to remove them from these 4 crippled reactors. As matter of fact, all these 4 reactors had been totally melt through and the nuclear fuels has been punctured the 4-inch thick steel outer shell. Furthermore, those 4 reactors generate 300 tons of highly radioactive contaminated water. The owner of these reactors, the TEPCO, STORED THESE HIGHLY RADIOACTIVE WATER in plastic drums and over the year, a lot of those 55-gal plastic drums developed leakage. Japan government simply allow those leaked highly radioactive water drained into the Pacific Ocean. The very reason that US has not opposing this highly radioactive water into the ocean is because those reactors were manufactured and installed by US Westinghouse. The fuel rods used in these reactors were enriched U235 and Pu239. The half life for U235is 704,000,000 years and Pu239 has a half life of 24,100 years. Without removing the fuel rods, those reactors will remain to be radioactive for thousands of years. 重要消息,請轉告好友們 - 多數日本人開始研究要移民,為什麼? 目前周邊國家把日本的放射性污染以TOP新聞來告知自己國人,不 要飲食日本的東西。美國的臨海中被發現到放射性數值越來越高。儘 量能不去日本最好不 要去。澳大利亞政府已經停止日本人的簽證發放, 美國也停止了日本人的美國移民。目前日本的狀況比我們想像的還 嚴重的多,全日本領土的70%以上被放射性幅射給污染。日本的放 射性物質已經向海洋流入,而且受影響的海洋面積越來越廣 。它的嚴重超過想像,日本政府怕帶來恐慌,他們會放棄或者用謊言 來告知周邊的人。日本的海鮮,菇類都不要飲食。上次311地震之 後損壞的日本核能 發電廠的放射性物質開始流入的海洋或者周邊,開始發現畸形海鮮及 植物。變異的菇類,變異的魚類, 變異的海產受到放射性物質的食品食用之後1--2年內會誘發食道 癌,淋巴癌,白血病等。特別是對幼兒,孕婦會有更大的影響。周邊 國家已經停止了與日本的海鮮貿易。從日本進口的青魚,貝殼,香菇 是第一個一定要避開的食品。日本各個地方開始發現了畸形黃瓜, 畸形草莓,畸形番茄,更驚訝的是玫瑰花中間出現了畸形草,還出現 了畸形百合花,畸形茄子等等植物以及畸形青蛙等動物。這些說明日 本國土的植物動物開始產生畸形了。壽司是日本代表菜肴。有位日本 漁夫幾天前在網路電視裡忠告日本國民,千萬不要吃旋轉壽司。 他說最近兩周內他抓獲的海鮮裡發現了一些畸形魚類。這些魚類廉價 來出售給這些餐廳,日本臨近海域裡抓獲的魚類放射性數值達到38 0倍。核輻射會引發動物基因突變已是人所共知的事實,而日本福島 核電站洩漏引發的輻射危機已經開始顯露。近日,日本琉球大學的研 究人員發現,爆發核危機的日本福島縣蝴蝶出現嚴重基因突變,他們 發現很多蝴蝶的腿,觸鬚以及翅膀形狀發生變化。在實驗室試驗顯示 ,這些異變與放射性物質有關。福島核危機爆發2個月後,琉球大學 的研究人員就在日本10個地方,包括福島地區,收集了144隻成 年草酢漿灰蝶。核危機發生時,這些成年蝴蝶應該處於正在過冬的幼 蟲狀態。通過對比不同地區蝴蝶出現的基因突變,研究人員發現在有 大量放射性物質的地區,蝴蝶翅膀更小,眼睛發育不規則。6個月後 ,研究人員再次從上述10個地方收集蝴蝶,發現來自福島的蝴蝶基 因突變率幾乎是此前2倍。從現在開始,千萬不要食用來 本的海 鮮或生魚片。請大力廣傳給你的親友們知道!
    1 人回報1 則回應5 年前
  • Sushi anyone? ------- Environment 22:03, 06-Jun-2023 Content of radioactive element in fish at Fukushima's Nuclear Power Plant 180 times of safe limit CGTN The radioactive elements in the marine fish caught in the harbor of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan far exceed safety levels for human consumption, according to a report issued by the plant's operator Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) on Monday. In particular, the data released show that the content of Cs-137, a radioactive element that is a common byproduct in nuclear reactors, is 180 times that of the standard maximum stipulated in Japan's food safety law. Screenshot of Tokyo Electric Power Company's report on the radioactive content in fish in the harbor of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan. /CGTN Screenshot of Tokyo Electric Power Company's report on the radioactive content in fish in the harbor of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan. /CGTN CGTN downloaded the English version of the report available on TEPCO's official website. According to the data, the sampled black rockfish contains the radioactive element Cs-137 with a content of 18,000 becquerels per kilogram. Data available on the website of Fukushima Revitalization Station run by Japan's Fukushima prefectural government shows that Japan's current limit of radioactive cesium in general food which contains fish is set at 100 becquerels per kilogram. Screenshot of Standard limits of radioactive substances for food in Japan, obtained from the website of Fukushima Revitalization Station run by Japan's Fukushima prefectural government. /CGTN Screenshot of Standard limits of radioactive substances for food in Japan, obtained from the website of Fukushima Revitalization Station run by Japan's Fukushima prefectural government. /CGTN According to the report, the location where the sampled fish was caught is at the port area of Units 1 to 4 of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, where a breakwater is built and nuclear wastewater with a high concentration of radioactive substances flows in. TEPCO said it will set up multiple protective nets to prevent fish from swimming out of the harbor. A Chinese news website sina.com.cn quoted experts noting that the radioactive elements in the nuclear wastewater could penetrate into fish, shrimp and other seafood, and later accumulate in the human body after consumption. A magnitude 9.0 quake on March 11, 2011, triggered a massive tsunami that destroyed the plant's power supply and cooling systems, causing reactors No. 1, 2 and 3 to melt and spew large amounts of radiation. Water used to cool the reactors' cores leaked into the basements of the reactor buildings and mixed with rainwater and groundwater. Now, 12 years after the triple reactor meltdowns, Japan is preparing to release the massive amount of treated radioactive wastewater into the sea later this summer. TEPCO on Monday started sending seawater into an underwater tunnel to be diluted before releasing the nuclear wastewater into the ocean. The company said that all facilities for the water release system are expected to be completed by the end of this month. Local fishing communities say their businesses and livelihoods will suffer still more damage. Neighboring countries such as China and South Korea and Pacific Island nations have raised safety concerns. Environmental groups including Friends of the Earth oppose the release. (With input from AP; cover image via VCG) (If you want to contribute and have specific expertise, please contact us at [email protected].)
    1 人回報2 則回應1 年前
  • 轉分享: 這是中研院生醫所所長郭沛恩院士 (他也是UCSF 教授)寫給前副總統陳健仁及時中部長,関於目前COVID-19 的一些建議,希望政府能夠接納。 Dear VP Chen, Hope that things are going well. I just completed my 9th quarantine after my 9th trip to Taipei during the pandemic and see that the Omicron variant of COVID-19 is now firmly established in Taiwan. While the CECC is moving quickly to address the widening spread of COVID-Omicron and is heading in the right direction, I find that the current policy is unsustainable and the messaging can be much improved. Since I was told that the CECC would welcome my suggestions, I have decided to do so. Please forward this message to the CECC for their consideration. 1. It is now very clear that COVID-Omicron is a very different disease than COVID-ALPHA/BETA/DELTA. Current vaccines are developed from COVID-ALPHA and cannot prevent INFECTION by COVID-Omicron even though they lower significantly the risk of SEVERE DISEASE and DEATH for those who are fully vaccinated and received booster shots recently. In addition, COVID-Omicron is highly contagious and has a very short incubation time; but it causes a milder disease, including shortened disease course and contagious period. 2. Because of the above, contact tracing does not work and avoiding infection is futile except one is in strict isolation or wears a PROPERLY FITTED N95 mask around others (see a very nice article about this in the NYT attached). This means that COVID testing in asymptomatic people is a waste of resources and is justified only in a limited set of situations (such as someone who works closely with vulnerable populations - e.g., nursing home and hospital workers - who has been in close contact with a positive case and needs to test negative to return to work). 3. Although the rate of hospitalization and death due to COVID-Omicron is low, when large populations are infected, the number of severe cases and severe disease is still significant (0.4% of 23 million people hospitalized = 92,000 in the hospital; 0.04% of 23 million people can die = 9,200 deaths) so the key is to keep the vulnerable people from developing severe disease. Medications used for COVID-ALPHA/BETA/DELTA variants such as antibody treatments and Remdesivir, etc., do not work for COVID-Omicron but the oral antivirals from Pfizer and Merck work amazingly well for preventing death (>85% reduction) and hospitalization. Paxlovid has done better in clinical trials to prevent hospitalization but it has many drug-drug interactions so many elderly people cannot use it. Molnupiravir has the theoretical risk of mutagenesis in pregnant women but for the elderly who are past reproductive age, it is a very safe and effective drug to use. I encourage the CECC to contact their counterparts in Japan, Singapore, Israel and the UK to get their experience in using these two oral anti-virals in the recent COVID-Omicron surge. [Full Disclosure: Dr. Dean Li, President of Merck Research Laboratories, is my brother-in-law so I am not pushing the Merck pill for obvious conflict of interest reasons.] Based on the above, my suggestions on messaging are: 1. Tell the country that COVID-Omicron is an entirely different disease than the previous COVID variants so the whole country IS NOT IMMUNE to getting the infection. However, through the sacrifice and cooperation of everyone in Taiwan, the country succeeded in preventing disease and death during the previous waves of infection that caused a lot of problems around the world. This is shared success that the CECC and everyone in Taiwan should take credit, be proud of, and very relieved by. 2. Despite the fact that no one is protected from infection, but because COVID-Omicron is mild, public health policy needs to be adjusted to focus on treating the vulnerable rather than preventing infection of all. 3. Acknowledge that some segments of society have been severely affected by COVID policies so the recovery of these sectors is taken in consideration in updating the public health policy. 4. Acknowledge that some COVID policies were confusing to the public in the past so the new policies will be more consistent and logical. For example, the policy of requiring masking outdoors while people eating at restaurants indoors are not required to mask makes no sense. My suggestions for the new policy are geared towards lowering hospitalization and death rates while avoiding unnecessary disruptions in people's lives: 1. Push vaccination for vulnerable groups (the elderly and those with pre-existing conditions that make them more prone to severe disease). Send vaccination nurses to the nursing homes and neighborhoods with elderly people to get everyone fully vaccinated (including booster shots). Getting the 30% of those 65-75 and 44% of elderly >75 who have not been fully vaccinated and boosted should be a high priority 2. Use the "test positive and treat" strategy for those in vulnerable groups. As I mentioned before, Paxlovid for all but Molnupiravir for those who cannot take Paxlovid. Treat them before their symptoms get worse because it is cheaper to give them the medicine than risk their need for hospitalization. 3. No more putting those with mild disease in special facilities or hospitals so that there are plenty of capacity for those who need hospitalization. 4. Recommend (not mandate with threat of punishment) those who have close contact with COVID-Omicron patients to mask around others for 5 days (no need to do so with household members because they are already given it to them) if they are asymptomatic. 5. No testing of asymptomatic people unless their job requires it (nursing home, hospital, etc.). 6. No more closing schools, factories, or offices because of positive COVID-Omicron cases. 7. No more mandatory masking except for those described in #4 above. People here are so used to masking that many will still do so with the threat of punishment. 8. No more mandatory quarantine, even for those who test positive. Highly recommend those who test positive to wear a mask when around people and not eat with others but not make it a punishable offense. [Treat them like people who have a bad flu, not like criminals.] 9. No more testing or quarantine requirements for visitors from abroad. As the local infection rate is now higher than that many other countries, there is no reason to require new arrivals to do anything different when they are asymptomatic. It's confusing to many that I can go anywhere in the world without quarantine but have to do quarantine plus multiple tests when arriving in Taiwan (and a handful of Asian countries). The benefit of the policies listed above is that the resources of the country are directed toward saving lives rather than collecting lots of infection data. It will reclaim the international travel hub status of Taoyuan International Airport (and not let Singapore and Seoul dominate the air travel sector) and revive the tourism, convention, airline, hotel businesses. It will simplify everyone's life and reduce anxiety. It may be counter intuitive but if you look at the data from the US university campuses and European countries, it is better to get as many young people infected as quickly as possible to shorten the surge while building up herd immunity for COVID-Omicron without a lot of severe cases. The old policy for flattening the curve is to prevent overwhelming the hospitals but with oral antivirals and milder disease, there is no need to flatten the curve. It is better to get the whole surge completed in 2 months like in most countries that pursue a more open policy. I am convinced that when the messaging is clear and based on current understanding of the situation, the people will embrace it and praise the CECC's leadership. Best, Pui -- Pui-Yan Kwok, MD, PhD Director, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Academia Sinica
    11 人回報1 則回應2 年前
  • 【ALPS 與東京電力公司 從來都不可靠】 【ALPS and TEPCO have proven to be unreliable 】 福島排放核污水,最重要的環節是多核素處理系統(ALPS)處理核污水的成效。東京電力公司聲稱污水中除氚以外的放射性物質可全部去除,包括: 鈷-60 (半衰期5年) 鍶-90(半衰期29年) 銫-137 (半衰期30年) 碳-14(半衰期5,730年) 碘-129 (半衰期1,570萬年) 不過,根據日本「ALPS小組委員會」報告顯示,132萬噸核污水經過ALPS 處理後,居然有73%的廢水放射性物質合量超標,東電美其名污水會作「二次處理」,但至今未有進一步數據。 而且,ALPS運行至今問題多多。2016年,系統被發現有4處洩漏。2018年,日本共同社披露「處理水」中的碘、銫等放射性元素超標。2021年,ALPS濾網過半數出現損壞,而濾網在兩年前剛換過。 東京電力公司本身亦是案底纍纍,在核電安全方面屢有隱瞞虛報和篡改紀錄的前科。2002年爆出東電近20年裏篡改或偽造核電廠安全檢查紀錄29份,董事長及總裁等高層宣布辭職;2007年東電承認自1977年起在福島第一、第二核電站等199次例行檢查中篡改檢測數據,隱瞞反應堆故障;2021年亦被爆隱瞞ALPS濾網破損。 2022年10月,《東京新聞》披露東電以有問題的輻射檢測儀誤導參觀者,以證明「ALPS處理水」的安全性。 美國海洋實驗室協會 (The U.S. National Association of Marine Laboratories),一個由100多個成員實驗室組成的組織發表立場文件,指日本缺乏足夠準確的科學數據支持排放核污水的安全性,相反有大量數據顯示釋放放射性污水存在嚴重隱憂,促請日本政府停止排污計劃,並與更廣泛的科學界別合作。 The crucial step in the Fukushima wastewater release is the operation of advanced liquid processing system (ALPS) to treat the nuclear waste. The Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) claims that all radioactive substances, except for tritium, can be completely removed from the wastewater, including: - Cobalt-60 (half-life of 5 years) - Strontium-90 (half-life of 29 years) - Cesium-137 (half-life of 30 years) - Carbon-14 (half-life of 5,730 years) - Iodine-129 (half-life of 15.7 million years) However, according to a report by the ALPS Subcommittee in Japan, 73% of the treated wastewater, out of 1.32 million tons, still exceeded the acceptable levels of radioactive substances. TEPCO claimed that the wastewater would undergo "secondary treatment," but no further data has been provided thus far. Furthermore, ALPS has faced numerous issues since its operation. In 2016, the system was found to have four leaks. In 2018, the Japanese Kyodo News revealed that radioactive elements such as iodine and cesium in the "treated water" exceeded the permissible limits. In 2021, over half of the ALPS filters were found to be damaged, despite having been replaced just two years before. TEPCO itself has a history of concealing and falsifying records regarding nuclear power plant safety. In 2002, it was revealed that TEPCO had tampered with or fabricated safety inspection records for nearly 20 years, leading to the resignation of top executives. In 2007, TEPCO admitted to falsifying inspection data in 199 instances since 1977 at Fukushima Daiichi and Daini nuclear power plants, concealing reactor malfunctions. In 2021, it was exposed that TEPCO had concealed the damage to ALPS filters. In October 2022, Tokyo Shimbun reported that TEPCO misled visitors with faulty radiation measurement devices to prove the safety of the "ALPS-treated water." The U.S. National Association of Marine Laboratories (NAML), an organization composed of over 100 member laboratories, published a position paper stating that Japan lacks sufficient accurate scientific data to support the safety of releasing nuclear wastewater. On the contrary, ample data indicates serious concerns regarding the release of radioactive wastewater. NAML urged the Japanese government to halt the discharge plan and collaborate with a broader scientific community. https://www.naml.org/policy/documents/2022-12-12%20Position%20Paper,%20Release%20of%20Radioactively%20Contaminated%20Water%20into%20the%20Ocean.pdf #日本 #核廢水 #核污染 #福島核電站 #福島 #japan #radioactive #fish #powerplant #fukushima #nuclearpower #saveouroceans #saynotodumping
    1 人回報3 則回應1 年前
  • 請把這文章轉發給你生命中每一位重要的成員 請好好看完。 多年以來人們一直被告知化療是治療癌症唯一值得去嘗試的方法 ( 嘗試 -成為了關鍵字;) , 但是 Johns Hopkins 將告訴你其實存在著其他的方法來消除癌症。 Cancer Update from Johns Hopkins: Johns Hopkins 最新癌症研究報告: 1. Every person has cancer cells in the body . These cancer cells do not show up in the standard tests until they have multiplied to a few billion. When doctors tell cancer patients that there are no mor! e cancer cells in their bodies after treatment, it just means the tests are unable to detect the cancer cells because they have not reached the detectable size.每一個人身上都帶有癌細胞,癌細胞是無法在一般檢查時被檢查出來的,除非癌細胞擴增至幾十億個數量。 2. Cancer cells occur between 6 to more than 10 times in a person's lifetime. 在每個人的一生中,癌細胞都會出現6至10次。 3. When the person's immune system is strong the cancer cells will be destroyed and prevented from multiplying and forming tumors. 當人體免疫系統強時,癌細胞是會被摧滅的,免疫系統強時能抑制腫瘤形成及擴增。 4. When a person has cancer it indicates the person has nutritional deficiencies . These could be due to genetic,but also to environmental, food and lifestyle factors. 當人被發現有癌症時,它意謂這個病患是有大量營養缺乏;這可能是由於基因、環境、食物及生活方式等因素造成的。 5. To overcome the multiple nutritional deficiencies, changing diet to eat more adequately and healthy, 4-5 times/day and by including supplements will strengthen the immune system. 如何克服營養缺乏,那就是要改變飲食及多進用能增強免疫系統之食物。 6. Chemotherapy involves poisoning the rapidly-growing cancer cells and al! so destroys rapidly-growing healthy cells in the bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract etc, and can cause organ damage, like liver, kidneys, heart, lungs etc. 化療不只能毒殺快速增長之癌細胞,但會一併消滅骨髓及胃腸道內之健康細胞,同時造成器官衰竭;如:肝 臟、腎臟、心臟及肺臟等等。 7. Radiation while destroying cancer cells also burns, scars and damages healthy cells, tissues and organs. 放射治療在摧毀癌細胞時,亦會灼傷健康細胞、組織及器官。 8. Initial treatment with chemotherapy and radiation will often reduce tumor size. However prolonged use of chemotherapy and radiation do not result in more tumor destruction. 初期化療及放射線治療是很容易將腫瘤面積縮小到某一程度, 然再延長上述療法並不能造成腫瘤完全消除。 9. When the body has too much toxic burden from chemotherapy and radiation the immune system is either compromised or destroyed, hence the person can succumb to various kinds of infections and complications. 化療及放射線治療會讓體內存有大量毒素而危及或摧毀免疫系統,因而導致病患易於感染及引發併發症。 10. Chemotherapy and ! radiation can cause cancer cells to mutate and become resistant and difficult to destroy. Surgery can also cause cancer cells to spread to other sites. 化療及放射線治療會造成病患癌細胞突變及產生抗體而變得難以摧毀,而手術則易使癌細胞擴散至其它部位。 11. An effective way to battle cancer is to starve the cancer cells by ! not feeding it with the foods it needs to multiply. 一個有效擊潰癌細胞的方式是:不供給癌細胞繁殖所需之食物,即是餓死癌細胞。 *CANCER CELLS FEED ON: 癌細胞以何為食物: a. Sugar substitutes like NutraSweet , Equal, Spoonful, etc are made with Aspartame and it is harmful .A better natural substitute would be Manuka honey or molasses, but only in very small amounts. Table salt has a chemical added to make it white in color Better alternative is Bragg's aminos or sea salt. 糖是癌的食物, 若不吃糖即刪除癌細胞很重要的一項食物供給。 b. Milk causes the body to produce mucus, especially in the gastro-intestinal tract.Cancer feeds on mucus. By cutting off milk and substituting with unsweetened soy milk cancer cells are being starved. 牛奶會使人體產生黏液,尤其是在胃腸道內,而黏液正是癌細胞之食物。因而阻絕牛奶及採用不甜之豆漿作替代,癌細胞就會在無食物情況下萎縮的。 c. Cancer cells thrive in an acid environment. A meat-based diet is acidic and it is best to eat fish, and a little other meat, like chicken. Meat also contains livestock antibiotics, growth hormones and parasites, which are all harmful! , especially to people with cancer. 癌細胞是在酸性環境中繁衍的,以肉為基本飲食的體質是酸性的,因而食用魚類及少量雞肉是較食用牛、豬為合適的。 且肉品均含有家畜抗生素、生長賀爾蒙及寄生蟲等,而這些均是對人體的有害物質,尤其是對癌症病患。 d. A diet made of 80% fresh vegetables and juice, whole grains , seeds, nuts and a little fruits help put the body into an alkaline environment. About 20% can be from cooked food in! cluding beans. Fresh vegetable juices provide live enzymes that are easily absorbed and reach down to cellular levels within 15 minutes to nourish and enhance growth of healthy cells. To obtai! n live enzymes for building healthy cells try and drink fresh vegetable juice(most vegetables including be an sprouts) and eat some raw vegetables 2 or 3 times a day. Enzymes are destroyed at temperatures of 104 degrees F (40 degrees C). 以80%新鮮蔬菜及青菜汁之飲食;含全穀類、種子、堅果及少量的水果是有益於體質轉變為鹼性的, 剩餘20% 可進食煮熟的豆類。新鮮蔬菜汁可提供活性酵素,活性酵素極易在15分鐘內被細胞組織吸收進而滋養強健康細胞,為取得活性酵素強壯健康細胞應多飲用新鮮果菜汁(多樣蔬菜含豆芽),同時每天進食生青菜(未煮過之)兩至三次,活性酵素在40度C時會被摧毀。 e. Avoid coffee, tea, and chocolate, which have high caffeine Green tea is a better alternative and has cancer fighting properties. Water-best to drink purified water, or filtered, to avoid known toxins and heavy metals in tap water. Distilled water is acidic, avoid it. 飲料必須避免飲用咖啡、茶、巧克力因上述飲料含咖啡因,綠茶是較佳之選擇,因為其有抗癌特性。而平常應飲用淨化水或過濾水,然應避免飲用有毒的或含重金屬的水。 蒸餾水是酸性的不要喝。 12. Meat protein is difficult to digest and requires a lot of digestive enzymes . Undigested meat remaining in the intestines becomes putrefied and leads to more toxic buildup. 肉類的蛋白質不易消化的,因為肉類的蛋白質需要大量消化酵素消化,未消化的肉類留殘在腸內,易引發有毒物質形成。 13. Cancer cell walls have a tough protein covering. By refraining from or eating less meat it frees more enzymes to attack the protein walls of cancer cells and allows the body's killer cells to destroy the cancer cells. 癌細胞壁有很硬之蛋白質包裹,節制食用肉類可讓多出之酵素去攻擊癌細胞壁之蛋白質,讓體內的殺手細胞有空間摧毀癌細胞。 14. Some supplements build up the immune system (IP6, Flor-ssence, Essiac, anti-oxidants, vitamins, minerals, EFAs etc.) to enable the bodies own killer cells to destroy cancer cells.. Other supplements like vitamin E are known to cause apoptosis, or programmed cell death , the body's normal method of disposing of damaged, unwanted, or unneeded cells. 部份營養品能增強免疫系統(如抗氧化劑、維他命、礦物質 等等)並驅使自體殺手細胞去摧毀癌細胞,其他營養品如維他命E會清除老化的細胞,漸使細胞更新,而非體內一般處置損壞、無用及不需要細胞之模式。 15. Cancer is a disease of the mind, body, and spirit. A proactive and positive spirit will help the cancer warrior be a survivor. Anger, un-forgiveness and bitterness put the body into a stressful and acidic environment. Learn to have a loving and forgiving spirit. Learn to relax and enjoy life. 癌症是一種心態、肉體和心靈上之疾病,因而能有前衛及積 極的心靈是可造就癌症戰士變為勝利天使,怨尤和苦痛會讓體質變為緊張及酸性,所以必須 學習愛與寬恕,同時學習放鬆及愛惜生命。 16. Cancer cells cannot thrive in an oxygenated environmen! t. Exercising daily, anddeep breathing help to get more oxygen down to the cellular level. Oxygen therapy is another means employed to destroy cancer ! ;cells. 癌細胞是無法在充滿氧氣的環境中繁衍,所以每日必須運動, 同時多作深呼吸以利氧進入細胞層,按氧氣療法是另一種擊潰癌細胞之工具。 1. No plastic containers in micro.不要將塑膠盒放入微波爐加熱 2. No water bottles in freezer. 不要將塑膠水瓶 放入冷藏室 3. No plastic wrap in microwave.不要將塑膠袋放入微波爐加熱 Johns Hopkins has recently sent this out in its newsletters. This information is being circulated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as well. Dioxin chemicals cause cancer, especially breast cancer . Dioxins are highly poisonous to the cells of our bodies. Don't freeze your plastic bottles with water in them as this releases dioxins from the plastic. Recently, Dr Edward Fujimoto, Wellness Program Manager at Castle Hospital , was on a TV program to explain this health hazard . He ta! lked about dioxins and how bad they are for us. He said that we should not be heating our food in the microwave using plastic containers. This especially applies to foods that contai! n fat He said that the combination of fat, high heat, and plastics releases dioxin into the food and ultimately into the cells of the body. Instead, he recommends using glass, such as Corning Ware, Pyrex or ceramic containers for heating food You get the same results, only without the dioxin! . So such things as TV dinners , instant ramen and soups, etc., should be removed from the container and heated in something else. Paper isn't bad but you don't know what is in the paper. It's just safer to use tempered glass, Corning Ware, etc. He reminded us that a while ago some of the fast food restaurants moved away from the foam containers to paper The dioxin problem is one of the reasons. Please share this with your whole email list......................... Also, he pointed out that plastic wrap, such as Saran, is just as dangerous when placed over foods to be cooked in the microwave. As the food is nuked, the high heat causes poisonous toxins to actually melt out of the plastic wrap and drip into the food. Cover food with a paper towel instead. 約翰霍普金斯已 將這篇研究報告用新聞稿方式發佈,同時 Walter Reed 陸軍醫學中心亦 將這篇報告傳播. 戴奧辛之化學物 質會導致癌症,尤其是乳癌。按戴奧辛對體內細胞具很! 高之毒性,因而千萬別將裝有水之塑膠罐放入冰箱,因為它亦會將戴奧辛釋出。前不久Dr. Edward Fujimoto 在電視節目中談 到健康之風險,他就強調戴奧辛對健康是多麼 有害,因而請千萬不要用塑膠容器放入微波爐 加熱食物。這尤其是指含有脂肪之食物,當脂 肪與高溫? P塑膠結合時,塑膠即會釋放出戴奧 辛並進入食物中,最終就進入體內之細胞。因 而他建議使用玻璃器皿作為加熱食物用,因為 它一樣可使食物變熱,然卻少了戴奧辛。紙是 不錯的容器,然你無法瞭解紙裡到底含有什麼 物質,因而較安全之容器是冶煉過的玻璃器 皿,如康寧器皿,他提醒為何前不 久速食店將泡沫塑料容器改為紙容器,其中戴 奧辛就是問題之一. 同時他亦指出塑 膠袋;如Saran 耐熱塑膠袋用於 包裝食物,在微波爐加熱時亦是非常危險的, 因為當食物用微波爐加熱! 時,高溫會讓毒素由 塑膠袋溶解出來進入食物內,所以應用紙包裹 食物作替代。 This is an article that should be sent to anyone important in your life. 請把這文章轉發給你生命中每一位重要的成員
    5 人回報2 則回應8 年前
  • 被『強酸強鹼』噴到或淋到時要如何處理? 2013年11月份,台灣石油工會,第一分會月刊報導(高雄廠) 作者,許廷訓,台灣中油公司(Taiwan cpc petroleum )服務, 目前是兼任,高壓特定氣体訓練班(中油公司,對新進員工的基礎訓練)的助教。 在高壓氣体訓練班的課程,我問過將近100個,以上來自台灣中油,全國各單位的工作人員,你們如果被硫酸淋到時你要如何做,所有的人異口同聲說,要用大量的清水沖洗,80%以上的人都有大學以上的學歷,他們都這樣說,我當場告訴他們,如果是這樣的,你會死的很難看,這也是我認為該公開讓大家知道的原因,目前高雄廠,所有有強酸強鹼的地方,告示牌(物質安全資料表),所有的說明都說,如被強酸強鹼淋到時要用大量的清水沖洗……..這種說法是正確嗎?如不正確為什麼幾十年來沒人質疑?在學校的化學實驗室老師,也是這樣告訴我們的? 本人以前曾經被因銹蝕管線針孔洩漏的硫酸所噴到,當時的感覺是好像有一個火把靠近你的臉頰,很熱很熱,我當然了解是被硫酸所噴到,(只是當時必須離開現場,因為那裡洩漏,一時間,看不出來那洩漏的地點),當時我所做的是,用未被硫酸所噴到的衣服擦拭被硫酸所噴到的臉頰,再去沖水,5-10分鐘,但是這跟沒有擦拭去沖水有什麼差別? N年前高雄廠,曾發生運酸槽車在洩酸入TANK時槽車出口管線,因壓力爆開,當時有兩個人被噴到,但是事後一個沒事(槽車司機)另一個人住院植皮,每天哀哀叫,時間長達十個月,為什麼差這麼多,原因是事發當時,司機很鎮靜,立即脫光身上所有的衣褲,拿起事先準備好的清潔棉布,擦拭身上的硫酸,再去沖先,另一個本場的工作人員,則是驚慌失措一路叫喊《救命》,待有人發現,他被硫酸所噴到時,用水沖洗他身上的硫酸,這一洗,洗出大問題,當然不洗也是大問題,時間是毫秒計算,為什麼差這麼多? 原因是硫酸的沸點為338℃,水的沸點只有100℃,水遇到硫酸時開始沸騰產生反應熱,硫酸可以迅速與蛋白質及脂肪發生醯胺水解作用及酯水解作用,從而分解生物組織,造成化學性燒傷。不過,其對肉體的強腐蝕性還與它的強烈脫水性有關,因為硫酸還會與生物組織中的碳水化合物發生脫水反應並釋出大量熱能。 除了造成化學燒傷,所以如有任何人遇到硫酸,正確的處理方式應該保持鎮靜,找出現場可以擦拭的棉布或其他可以擦拭的紙等(這是減量,減少附著在皮膚的硫酸),立即擦拭再去沖水5-10分鐘。 最多只是如一級燒燙傷,這一事件後我遇到一個在大發工業區擔任某化學公司,槽車司機的X先生,我問他遇到時如何處理,他說就這麼處理,我問他為什麼不將這消息公告給社會大眾知道?他說了,幹,人家官大學問大,我只是一個司機,人家會聽我的意見嗎,我無言以對。 他舉出三個例子,來說明處理方式不同所造成的結果,第一例,在國道一號上發生遊覽車撞擊,鹽酸槽車事故,槽車破裂,遊覽車上的檔風玻璃也破了,鹽酸噴到司機的眼睛,隨車小姐立即以飲用瓶裝水沖洗司機的眼睛,結果是,後來司機的眼睛洗好了,司機的眼睛,也完蛋了,第二例發生在某加工區,槽車洩酸時,也發生因長時間使用後的物質脆化(當時忘了問他材質到底是塑膠的或橡膠的,約使用多久了)洩酸管線爆裂了,一個不知是好奇或無知的經理,靠近槽車很不幸的,那經理被噴到了,當然槽車司機處理經驗很豐富,立即脫光那經理身上所有的衣物幫他擦拭後再沖洗,入院十多天就回家,無大事,第三例,發生在該生產硫酸的公司內,兩個工作人員,被破裂管線的硫酸所噴到,一個如同第二例,司機幫忙處理,另一個,因一時間他無法幫忙,其他現場的人也驚嚇到,不敢也不懂,幫另一個被酸噴到的人脫衣服,而是直接用水幫他沖洗,結果,後果很慘痛,体無完膚,根據司機的說法,醫生所開的嗎啡給患者服用都無效,無法止痛,也是哀哀叫長達幾個月。 本文出來前,我所做的實驗,(戴有面罩的安全帽掛橡膠手套及護目鏡穿雨衣)去買已切好的豬皮20X10用鐵丁固定在木板上,用鹽酸做實驗,有擦拭和沒有擦過的實驗結果一目了然,所以被強酸鹼所噴到一定要先擦拭過再沖水,才是保命之道。 如果我們把濃硫酸慢慢地倒入水中,卻是安安靜靜的,水只是漸漸的變熱,而且不濺開來。當濃硫酸與水遇在一起,就發生化學反應,生成水合物,同時放出大量的熱,1公斤的濃硫酸與水化合時放出的熱量,足以使2公斤的冷水,一下子升高到攝氏100度。 濃硫酸看上去像油,可是卻比水重(1.9倍),比同體積的水差不多要重上一倍,很明顯,如果把水倒進濃硫酸,水就浮在濃硫酸上,當發生化學反應時,水就猛烈地沸騰起來,四處飛濺。 如果反過來把濃硫酸倒進水裡,情況就不一樣了,濃硫酸比水重,把濃硫酸慢慢地倒進水中,它就逐漸地沉到水底,然後再分佈到溶液的各個部分,這樣,反映所產生的熱量被均勻地分配到整個溶液,溫度慢慢上升,不會使水迅速地騰起來。 本人在此真誠的建議,各級學校的實驗室或化學系所,各公司有用到強酸鹼的地方,應立即修改告示牌(物質安全資料表,有強酸鹼的地方,應準備棉布做擦拭用,不要用化學纖維布,大林廠有硫酸法的烷化(以硫酸為催化劑的製程)工場,更應該準備好,因為10年20年後所有的管線,除非全面更新,絕對會這裡漏,那裡漏。 備註,本文部份,參考維基百科及網路文章,感謝工安課,王錦波先生與第七硫磺總領班,楊耀昆先生對本文的校正。 ,也歡迎老師,本人在此授權,請賢人翻譯成英日文,給世界各國的朋友分享,請將公司的CPC排在前頭,說明這是在台灣的CPC公司人員所做的實驗。 Nov. 2013, Monthly journal report of 1st branch of OIL LABOR UNION in Kaohsiung Taiwan CPC. By Mr. Hsu Ting XUN, serve in Taiwan CPC, now is the part time TA for the HIGH-PRESSURE SPECIFIC GAS training class, a class which trains all the new employees in CPC. In the HIGH PRESSURE training class, I ever asked more than 100 members from all different departments and branches of CPC TAIWAN., “If you were sprayed or poured by sulfuric acid, what would you do!?” The answer is 100% in unison “Rinse with great amount of water!” You know, 80% of these members graduated from universities. They all did say so. Hearing the answer, I on the spot told them “If you did so, you were destined to die ugly”This is why I insist to make it public. Nowadays in Kaohsiung plant, all where there is sulfuric acid or alkali, as well as all the bulletin boards [material safety sheets]shows: “Rinse with great amount of water while sprayed by sulfuric acid” But is this statement appropriate and accurate!?If not, why for decades nobody doubted!? And we were all taught so by chemistry teachers in labs of schools? Before, I ever sprayed by sulfuric acid leaking from the needle hole of a corrosivepipe. I felt like a burning torch accessing my face. It’s extremely hot. I surely realizedit wassulfuric acid, but I couldn’t spot where the leaking hole was. I had to leave right at that moment. The step took first was to wipe my sprayed face with the clean part of my clothes then, rinsedit with water for 5-10 minutes. But on earth, what makes the difference with the way you rinsedwithout wiping it clean first!? Years ago in Kaohsiung plant, a sulfuric acid transporting truck’s exporting pipeline burst because of pressure while vented sulfuric acid into the tank. Two men were sprayed. Yet later on, one man [the driver] was not serious, while another one had to be hospitalized andgrafted, leading a crying miserable life for ten months. Why such a big contrast! The reason is right at thatmoment, the driver completely calmed himself down, ripped all his dressing off then, wipedsulfuric acid with the clean cotton that he used to prepare ahead, then rinsedwith water the last. As to the other man, he was crying and screaming in panic all the way till someone found him and helpedrinse with great amount of water. Here the key problem is: Water or NOT WATER firstdefinitely matter a lot! It was so urgent, what made such a big difference? You know the boiling point of sulfuric acid is 338centigrade degree while water only 100. When water meetssulfuric, water begins to boil and produce heatas reaction. Sulfuric acid, along with protein and fat, rapidly facilitates[R-C-NH2] hydrolysisandEster hydrolysis, further todecompose bio- tissue, causing the chemical burns. Its strong corrosion to body dorelate toits strong dehydration.Sulfuric acid can cause dehydration reaction when it meets the carbohydrate of bio-tissue then, release great amount of heat to causechemical burns. So for anybody sprayed by sulfuric acid, the accurate approach is to calm down,immediatelywipe off acid with clean cotton or paper available [this is to minify or reduce the sulfuric acid on skin] ,then rinse 5-10 minutes. The worst resultcan only be one grade burn. Afterwards, I met Mr. X, a tank driver who served in a chemistry company in DAFA INDUSTRIALZONE. I asked what he would do if he met same situation. The answer was completely the same approach. Then why he didn’t make it public? His answer was“I am just a driver, can any high ranking officer listen to my opinion!?” I was totally speechless. He gave three examples to illustrate three different results caused by the diverse handling procedure:[a]. One tour bus bumped into sulfuric acid- loading truck on the ZHONGSHAN national freeway. The tank broke down. So did the window shield of the tour bus. Acid sprayed onto the bus driver’s eyes. The lady tour guide spontaneouslyrinsed his eyes with bottle water. The eyes were washed, but ruined.[b].This accident happened in THE PROCESSING ZONE. When an acid tank vented, the venting pipeline burst [pipelinebeing brittle after long use.][Material of pipe is plastic or rubber, or how long it has been used not known]. An either curious or ignorant manager walked close to the tank and unfortunately he was sprayed. Thanks to the well experienced tank driver, he immediately ripped off all the manager’s dressing, wiped his body clean, thenrinsed with water. About 10 days in hospital, he returned home without big problem. [c].In a sulfuric acid producing company, two workers sprayed by the broken pipeline. One was managed under accurate approach, yet another one was not so lucky. He, with the help of the stunned people around, directly rinsed the body. What’s the result!? Miserable and severely!! He kept hospitalized for long,even the morphine prescribed by doctor couldn’tkill his pain, recalled the poor worker. Before this article came public, I did an experiment [wearinghelmet with mask, rubber gloves, goggle and raincoat].I bought some chopped pigskin 20x10,nailedthemontowood . After pouring acid, I observed the wipedand not wiped pigskin, and the result was obvious at aglance. So if sprayed by acid or alkali, wipe clean first, then rinse. This is the life-saving approach. If we pour thick sulfuric acid into water, quietly and gradually the water will be getting hot, and will not splash. When thick sulfuric acid mixes with water, chemical reaction happens, producing hydrate and at the same time releasing big amount of heat. The heat released by 1kg thick sulfuric acid hydrating with water can lead to a sudden rise of temperature of 2kg cold water to100 centigrade degree. Thick sulfuric acid looks like oil, but actually it is heavier than water by 1.9 times, and heavier 1 time than water of same volume. Obviously, if we pour water into thick sulfuric acid, water will float on the acid.Chemical reaction happens, water will violently be getting hot, and splash all over. ON the contrary, if we pour thick sulfuric acid into water, the effect differs. It is heavier than water, it will gradually sink into bottom and distribute in each part of liquid, so the reacting heat is distributed in the liquid in average. The temperature rises slowly and slowly, the water will not be getting hot rapidly andfuriously. Here, I sincerely suggest that all labs and chemistry departments in schools or all companies where sulfuric acid and alkali are used should amend all bulletin boards [material safety sheets]. Where there is sulfuric acid or alkali, cotton[no chemical fiber cloth] should be readily prepared. Especially, DALIN plant has the alkylation workplace of sulfuric acid [Sulfuric acid or hydrofluoric acid as a catalyst in processing]. It should have to be well prepared, because all the pipelines absolutely should be leaking where and there after 10 or 20 years, unless they are all updated. RE: parts of this article took wiki and internet for reference. Great thanks to Mr. Wang Jin-bo, industrial safety division, and Mr. Yang Yao- kun, the leading foremanof 7thsulfur, for their guidance and correction. Welcome friends all over the world translating it into kinds of languages to help those in need. And don’t hesitate to write me if necessary for more understanding and interpretation. Thanks!! Thanks sister melody translation
    15 人回報1 則回應2 年前