訊息原文

7 人回報1 年前
Yo, that's a massive oyster.
I wonder what's inside of it.
How do we even open this?
3.5 kg

現有回應

目前尚無回應

增加新回應

  • 撰寫回應
  • 使用相關回應 12
  • 搜尋

你可能也會對這些類似文章有興趣

  • Welcome to America's Got Talent. Thanks. Who are you? My name's Ethan Jan. I'm from Redlands, California. How old are you? I'm 17 years old. 17 years old. So you're in school? Yeah, I'm a junior in high school. And what do you want to be when you grow up? I actually don't really have much of an idea. Well, what are you going to do for us? Just going to do a quick Rubik's Cube act. You make it sound so much more exciting than it actually is. Do you think you can win this contest? Hmm. Well, that's the spirit. Yeah. Okay. I cannot wait to see what you're going to do right here. Thanks. Go ahead, buddy. So judges, may I please come down to the front desk over there? Please. The front desk? We're not checking you out. Or desk. Do you want to talk to the concierge? All right. So in front of the four of you, there's a Rubik's Cube. Could all of you please scramble them up as much as you would like? Like whatever we want? Yes. Okay. You know what I used to do when I couldn't figure it out? I would take all the stickers off and re-stick them. All right. Now that these Rubik's Cubes are all scrambled up, I'm going to do something a little bit fun. What's the next level? Upstairs. He's a genius. Howie, that's what he is. When I met you, you were not very excited for what you were going to do. Oh, no. I was like so excited. I was just a little bit nervous at the same time. I wasn't sure how to act. Yeah. Now you're transforming in front of us. And that was amazing. That was flawless. It was super fun. It was showmanship as well. It doesn't in theory sound super exciting, but this was so incredible. I mean, again, I don't think that there's a human inside of you. Probably a robot. I don't know. Because your eyes were like. It was incredible. You've just done. Incredible. What you did was truly amazing. And I love how you underplayed it. And then you just dazzled us. So we are going to vote. I would like to start off with the first yes. We love being surprised. That was a big surprise the whole time. And that's why you've now got four yeses. How do you feel right now? I'm just really happy to have gotten four yeses. That was really unexpected. Well, you deserve it. You deserve it. You did such a great job, my man. Absolutely incredible.
    4 人回報2 則回應4 年前
  • If you don't get vaccinated, you're anti-social. This is what the Dutch Prime Minister and Health Minister told us. You don't get vaccinated just for yourself, but also for others. You do it for all of society. That's what I said. Today, this turned out to be complete nonsense. In a Covid hearing in the European Parliament, one of the Pfizer directors just admitted to me, At the time of introduction, the vaccine had never been tested on stopping the transmission of the virus. This removes the entire legal basis for the Covid passport, the Covid passport that led to massive institutional discrimination as people lost access to essential parts of society. I find this to be shocking, even criminal. Please watch the video until the end. For you, Mrs. Smolle, I have the following question, which I want a clear answer to. Yes or no? And I'm looking forward to it. Thank you very much. Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping humanisation before it entered the market? No. We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market. This is scandalous. Millions of people worldwide felt forced to get vaccinated because of the myth that you do it for others. Now this turned out to be a cheap lie. This should be exposed. Please share this video.
    1 人回報1 則回應4 年前
  • If you don't get vaccinated, you're anti-social. This is what the Dutch Prime Minister and Health Minister told us. You don't get vaccinated just for yourself, but also for others. You do it for all of society. That's what I said. Today this turned out to be complete nonsense. In a Covid hearing in the European Parliament, one of the Pfizer directors just admitted to me, At the time of introduction, the vaccine had never been tested on stopping the transmission of the virus. This removes the entire legal basis for the Covid passport. The Covid passport that led to massive institutional discrimination as people lost access to essential parts of society. I find this to be shocking, even criminal. Please watch the video until the end. For you Mrs. Smolle, I have the following question, which I want a clear answer to. Yes or no? And I'm looking forward to it. Thank you very much. Regarding the question around, did we know about stopping humanisation before it entered the market? No. We had to really move at the speed of science to really understand what is taking place in the market. This is scandalous. Millions of people worldwide felt forced to get vaccinated because of the myth that you do it for others. Now this turned out to be a cheap lie. This should be exposed. Please share this video.
    1 人回報1 則回應4 年前
  • We learned this morning that the FDA is now saying that it's OK to take ivermectin if you have COVID. I mean, Senator, I remember talking with you repeatedly during COVID about your upset that you were they were trying to cancel you because you were talking to doctors to try to find out the right ways to treat COVID without having to get too many boosters and COVID shots. My COVID was gone in a day when I took ivermectin. And now three years later, the FDA says, oh, yeah, that's fine. Take ivermectin. What? Maria, you know, the doctors I've been dealing with and talking to for years now, they believe that probably hundreds of thousands of Americans lost their lives because they were denied really treatment. And they were denied it because the FDA sabotaged, for example, ivermectin. They said, come on, y'all, you're not a cow, you're not a horse. This is supposedly horse medicine. No, this is a Nobel Prize-winning medicine that could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives. It did save many, many lives because people you did have doctors with the courage to and the compassion to actually treat patients using it and putting at risk their medical license. But unfortunately, you say, what can we do? Well, we do have reporters like yourself like John Solomon, other people that have the courage to report the truth against the mainstream media and against the narrative. But that's the only way this is going to be solved is we need the truth to be exposed. We need more Americans to listen to the truth, to be exposed to the truth, to pull their heads out in the sand, quite honestly, open up their eyes and understand what is happening in this country. We are going down a very dangerous path, but it's a path that is being laid out and planned by an elite group of people that want to take total control over our lives. And that's what they're doing bit by bit. They do it by increasing massive government spending, increase the size of government, take over of the who, these amendments that are coming up that are going to be voted on in 2024, the who are frightening and they really risk taking away all of our sovereignty. People have to awaken to the dangers of the moment.
    2 人回報1 則回應3 年前
  • Oh, we like war. We like war. We're a war-like people. We like war because we're good at it. You know why we're good at it? Because we get a lot of practice. This country's only 200 years old and already we've had 10 major wars. We average a major war every 20 years in this country, so we're good at it. And it's a good thing we are. We're not very good at anything else anymore. Can't build a decent car. Can't make a TV set or a VCR. What the fuck? Got no steel industry left. Can't educate our young people. Can't get health care to our old people. But we can bomb the shit out of your country, all right? We can bomb the shit out of your country, all right? Especially if your country is full of brown people. Oh, we like that, don't we? That's our hobby. That's our new job in the world, bombing brown people. Iraq, Panama, Grenada, Libya. You've got some brown people in your country. Tell them to watch the fuck out. Or we'll goddamn bomb them. But when's the last white people you can remember that we bombed? Can you remember the last white? Can you remember any white people we've ever bombed? The Germans. Those are the only ones. And that's only because they were trying to cut in on our action. They wanted to dominate the world. Bullshit. That's our fucking job. Think of how we started. Think of that. This country was founded by a group of slave owners who told us all men are created equal. Oh yeah. All men. Except for Indians and niggers and women, right? Always like to use that authentic American language. This was a small group of unelected white male land-holding slave owners who also suggested their class be the only one allowed to vote. Now that is what's known as being stunningly and embarrassingly full of shit. I think Americans really show their ignorance when they say they want their politicians to be honest. What are these fucking cretins talking about? If honesty were suddenly introduced into American life, the whole system would collapse. No one would know what to do. Honesty would fuck this country up. And I think deep down Americans know that. That's why they elected and re-elected Bill Clinton. That's why. Because the American people like their bullshit right out front where they can get a good strong whiff of it. Clinton might be full of shit, but at least he lets you know it. Dole tried to hide it, didn't he? Dole kept saying, I'm a plain and honest man. Bullshit. People don't believe that. What did Clinton say? He said, hi folks, I'm completely full of shit, and how do you like that? And the people said, you know something, at least he's honest.
    1 人回報2 則回應4 年前
  • 在網路上傳播的影片的逐字稿。內容如下: 在網路上傳播的影片的逐字稿。 Oh, that's perfect. Yes. Yes. How long can you hold that? I don't know. Okay. All right. We're going to make it even better. You ready for this? You're going to take the card away. Okay. We're going to count to three. We're going to try something. Just on the count of three. Just try to lift your legs up. You got it. You got it. Here we go. Ready? One. Oh my goodness. Two. Take that back card away. Three. Go. Oh, try and kick your feet. Kick your feet. See what happens. Oh my goodness. You're moving. Oh my goodness. Whoa. Kick faster. Move faster. That's amazing. How are you doing this? Let's go in the store. Turn it. Come in this. Oh my goodness. Oh, here it comes. That is incredible. You know how he's doing that? Have you seen that? Oh my goodness. That is incredible. Are you seeing that? Okay. Do you know how he did that? Oh my God. Oh my God. No, no, no. Wait. Wait.
    6 人回報1 則回應3 年前
  • didn't stop transmission, I'm here to talk about how unsafe the vaccines are. I want to explain why and I want to go through the biochemistry. Most vaccines, for example, the COVID virus has 29 proteins in it. Normally, if you de-attenuated a vaccine, you gave someone a de-attenuated vaccine. The other thing is, because that molecule is still quite large, it's 28 molecules remaining in a normal de-attenuated vaccine. It is too big to cross the endothelium. What is the endothelium? It is the small capillary between your muscle tissues, the bloodstream. What this particular vaccine does is it delivers a lipid nanoparticle. It is a very tiny particle, much smaller by a factor of 1,000 than a normal virus. What that means is it can travel from the tissue through the endothelium into your bloodstream. About half of the vaccine and the lipid nanoparticles go into organs other than the injection site. This is despite the fact that we were told that a normal vaccine goes into your deltoid muscle and that's where it stays. Well, that's not the case with this particular vaccine. What's particularly scary about this is they knew this in the animal trials, and despite the fact that the concentration was still increasing after 48 hours, you know what they did? They stopped the trial. They stopped the trial. Now, don't you think you would run the trial right through to the point of where the lipid nanoparticles had left the body? But they didn't do that.
    1 人回報1 則回應3 年前
  • This drawing is much bigger than it seems, where from far you might think that you see a bunch of crows, but then you zoom in and you see that one crow isn't a crow at all. Then you might see that there's a little glow worm on top of its head, but then when we get closer you can see that it's actually a little fictional creature with an astronaut ant on its back. And if you look at the tiny, tiny little thing that the astronaut is holding, you can see that it's a little atom. But what's a tiny, tiny little atom to us might be bigger than the world to someone else. And if we zoom in to the electron in that atom, we can see that there's a whole other world inside that leads to an observatory that leads to some amoebas looking out into the distance. Now what you might not know is that if we back up out of the electron and go into the other electron, we can see that there is a world inside it as well. And even though both these worlds look completely different, if we search around and we just investigate, we may just see that what seems completely different and far away might be much more connected than we might just think. And if you like art, I'm not that far away as well. I teach on Schoolism.com.
    7 人回報1 則回應3 年前
  • This drawing is much bigger than it seems, where from far you might think that you see a bunch of crows, but then you zoom in and you see that one crow isn't a crow at all. Then you might see that there's a little glow worm on top of its head, but then when we get closer you can see that it's actually a little fictional creature with an astronaut ant on its back. And if you look at the tiny, tiny little thing that the astronaut is holding, you can see that it's a little atom. But what's a tiny, tiny little atom to us might be bigger than the world to someone else. And if we zoom in to the electron in that atom, we can see that there's a whole other world inside that leads to an observatory, that leads to some amoebas looking out into the distance. Now what you might not know is that if we back up out of the electron and go into the other electron, we can see that there's a world inside it as well. And even though both these worlds look completely different, if we search around and we just investigate, we may just see that what seems completely different and far away might be much more connected than we might just think. And if you like art, I'm not that far away as well. I teach on Schoolism.com.
    2 人回報1 則回應3 年前
  • This drawing is much bigger than it seems, where from far you might think that you see a bunch of crows, but then you zoom in and you see that one crow isn't a crow at all. Then you might see that there's a little glow worm on top of its head, but then when we get closer you can see that it's actually a little fictional creature with an astronaut ant on its back. And if you look at the tiny, tiny little thing that the astronaut is holding, you can see that it's a little atom. But what's a tiny, tiny little atom to us might be bigger than the world to someone else. And if we zoom in to the electron in that atom, we can see that there's a whole other world inside that leads to an observatory, that leads to some amoebas looking out into the distance. Now what you might not know is that if we back up out of the electron and go into the other electron, we can see that there's a world inside it as well. And even though both these worlds look completely different, if we search around and we just investigate, we may just see that what seems completely different and far away might be much more connected than we might just think. And if you like art, I'm not that far away as well. I teach on Schoolism.com.
    3 人回報1 則回應3 年前