和 Article ID: 39jl9qfz1didp 此篇相同回報者之文章列表
Order By:140 articles
- https://youtube.com/shorts/5W9B_Yn7CiI?si=cb6qpsB0Ja_U9G411 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtu.be/T57ZQ7o1YvY?si=yqFXN7M4w_r_5JbI1 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtube.com/shorts/nuumVL-wJh8?si=7PcaUGDalx_lcOku1 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtube.com/shorts/kP-loFxTNcc?si=xUm3K-Q3nXM6V9P21 人回報・1 年前
- https://ambiotech.asia/1 人回報・1 年前
- 外泌體=美容界的提款機? 很多美容人聽到九紫離火運,就覺得女性終於要翻身了。結果呢,整波能量浪潮,完全擦身而過。你不是不夠努力,是還沒跟上外泌體這波紅利。告訴你2025年,美容人一定要跟上的賽道。外泌體正在悄悄的改變整個美容。它不只是保養,是從肌底重啟修復力。膠原蛋白回來了,臉穩定了,連掉髮都開始改善。客人回購率翻倍,店內營收直接破表,營收翻倍是真的。2025年,你還在等客人上門嗎?你只差這一步,跟上外泌體的風口,留言、私訊我,我教你如何讓療程幫你把錢賺回來。1 人回報・1 年前
- 只是多加這一項營業翻倍 2025美業 最強爆品在這裡 現在的美業,如果你還只靠單一項目撐點,真的會被踢出市場。不論你是做美睫、美甲、皮膚管理,越是洗頭,還是醫美輕療程,都可以搭上臉+髮+細胞修復的新潮流,讓一次服務變三種收入。客人不只想要變漂亮,更在意年輕感跟氣場狀態。外泌體不只是皮膚變亮,它還能促進細胞修復,刺激毛髮再生。結合現有項目,設計加購套組,客人體驗升級,業績自然上漲。現在不是拼單一項目的年代了,一套療程賺產品、賺服務、還賺口碑,才是2025美業該走的方向。想知道怎麼把外泌體跟你的項目完美結合,留言+轉型,我把店家營收翻倍的秘訣直接給你。1 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtube.com/shorts/vf4fMOrl4ds?si=pFTQ7NL31Nut1jxR1 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtu.be/D1vR8JhLBYw?si=13DrAIv6CPhAnSfl1 人回報・1 年前
- Who pays tariffs, Mr. Secretary? No, no, no. Ask the answer the questions I asked, please. I only have five minutes. Who pays tariffs? Sorry. Well, there Who pays tariffs? Sorry, Mr. Secretary, please. Excuse me. The question is very simply, who pays tariffs, Mr. Chairman? I'd like him to answer that question. Uh, well, He wants to answer other questions. Well, Congressman, if the Congressman, if the exporters they, uh, dislike tariffs so much, they, uh, why wouldn't they, uh, if I think what you're trying to get me to say Do you remember the question? I'm not sure you did. Who pays tariffs? That they It's a very complicated question. People pay tariffs, right, Mr. Secretary? I know. Clearly aren't going to answer. I'm not going to waste my time having you go uh, uh, uh, uh. Mr. Secretary, reclaiming, Mr. Chairman, I ask reclaiming my time. tariffs. So I'll ask one more time, who pays tariffs? Uh, sir, the history would show that it is a complicated mix of who pays the tariffs over various times. So that's exactly the problem. If your answer, and you're a very educated person, you're a very impressive bio, cannot answer the question who pays tariffs because you won't answer that, and you say it's a complicated issue. It's not complicated. Consumers pay Trump's tariff tax. That's the reality.1 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtu.be/fkT_SvxH5e4?si=WRB4Ra9jh0Q-ySsa1 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtu.be/cmx-iHKmzTY?si=uFka9cq01y7oKXHZ1 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtube.com/shorts/umRvqKs4mPo?si=Ie1LcMlCPepCajtb1 人回報・1 年前
- https://m.163.com/dy/article/JTJ3V17T054679X8.html?spss=adap_pc1 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtu.be/nN3W2trjePI?si=0u60w2KwZSRt_Lu71 人回報・1 年前
- 柯建銘垃圾一枚 連座位都要搶C位 還好有台階 TikTok @jimmychen_xinzhuang1 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtube.com/shorts/SA0WaQCHGUM?si=nqxQevDYnaJwY6lo1 人回報・1 年前
- Do you remember like when and why and how we started talking about tariffs in the first place? It was in his first campaign for president. Trump didn't really have any formal economic advisors. So he told his son-in-law, Jared, to find him an economic advisor. Trump reportedly gave Jared some vague ideas of what his thoughts were on economic issues. You know, something, something, "make me look tough," "China bad," something, something. Um, Jared then decided to find his father-in-law a financial advisor for his presidential campaign by going on the amazon.com website and starting to browse books. Not like reading the books, because you can't do that on the Amazon website. He was just looking at the covers, looking at the titles. And he found a book title that he thought was so cool. The title was Death by China. "Oh my god, that's so cool. That's so awesome." And that apparently was it. Death by China, co-authored by a man named Peter Navarro. Jared then cold-called Navarro, a well-known trade deficit hawk who agreed to join the team as an economic adviser. Navarro was a major advocate for an aggressive pro-tariff policy. Where did Peter Navarro get his idea that tariffs would be a good policy for America? What was his like backup for that conviction? Well, he did have backup from a "real expert" who he cited in at least a half dozen of his books, including the one that Jared found on Amazon that fateful day. In all of his books, Peter Navarro has cited an economics expert to justify his views. And the economics expert he cites is somebody named Ron Vara, V-A-R-A, Ron Vara. When Trump won the presidency and entered the White House, this Ron Vara started circulating a memo around Washington in support of Trump using tariffs in trade policy. According to The New York Times, the memo had been quote "sent from an email address purportedly belonging to Ron Vara". At one point, Ron Vara wrote in the memo that Trump could quote "ride the tariffs to victory". The problem is Ron Vara doesn't exist, he never has. The economics expert that Peter Navarro has long cited to explain why he's so gung-ho on tariffs, this person, Ron Vara, is a made-up person. He is a fictional person. Who is Ron Vara? Ron Vara is an anagram of Navarro, which is his last name. Circulating a fake memo from a fake person with a fake email address in order to make it look like this was a serious issue being debated by real experts. That is the intellectual basis on which Donald Trump today wiped six trillion dollars of wealth out of existence and crashed America's markets and brought America and the world to the brink of a self-inflicted, on-purpose global Great Depression along the lines of what we had in 2008 and what the pandemic inflicted upon us in 2020. This time, the global disaster is Donald Trump's big brain.2 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtube.com/shorts/kVZXzvxDl_s?si=WExPuNG5xmEL7L2b1 人回報・1 年前
- https://youtube.com/shorts/KFWVMyi_pwQ?si=4_29ExcYfq7znQ7g1 人回報・1 年前
- 截2024撥補台電 4001億電價 照漲 榨 進四漲,還要撥補填黑洞? 乾 漲價循環停不了,有何立場要撥補? 電價三年連四漲 (元/度) 4.0 漲12% 漲11% | 3.5 漲11%| |漲8.4%| 3.4518 3.0 3.1154 2.848 2.5 2.6253 0 4月 10月 4月 4月 10月 2022 2023 2024 榨乾人民納稅錢1 人回報・1 年前
- 最后的最难的 我爱他们 毫无疑问的 我的妻子 我的孩子 最重要的人物 对我来说 我经常看到他们 父母 我完全没有看到他们1 人回報・1 年前
- 1 人回報・1 年前
- 現在你可以去看我任何的採訪,或者去看《迅猛追逐》 你可能不相信,但我肯定 不肯定,但是肯定 這些材料是故意設計的 是用來傷害、謀殺、殺人 並減少人類的殖民 這就是我的結論 我可以站出來,我會在法庭 法庭會在很短的時間內在 Costa Rica 我會使用這個結論,我會給你詳細的解釋 這是第一點,所以不要拿這些注射器 也不要拿下一批,它們也會用來傷害你 MRNA基礎的材料是危險的,不要拿它們 請不吝點贊訂閱轉發打賞支持明鏡與點點欄目3 人回報・1 年前
- 1 人回報・1 年前