訊息原文

1 人回報1 則回應4 年前
80 young Canadian doctors who were all ‘vaccinated’ have died ‘suddenly’ since the Covid-19 “vaccines” were given Emergency Authorisation without any long-term safety data
80 名加拿大醫生在注射COVID疫苗後“突然死亡”

Dr. Makis Pleads With CMA To Investigate
Makis 博士請求 CMA 進行調查

https://t.me/childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk/2336

現有回應

增加新回應

  • 撰寫回應
  • 使用相關回應 7
  • 搜尋

你可能也會對這些類似文章有興趣

  • https://www.collective-evolution.com/2018/04/24/why-farmed-salmon-is-one-of-the-most-toxic-things-you-can-put-in-your-body/
    1 人回報1 則回應7 年前
  • 【請求荷蘭海牙常設仲裁法院調查香港暴警事件】 這是具有法律效力的 麻煩大家協助一下擴散跟連署!! https://www.change.org/p/request-permanent-court-of-arbitration-to-investigate-unlawful-use-of-force-of-hong-kong-police?utm_content=cl_sharecopy_17005953_en-GB%3Av5&recruiter=90670311&recruited_by_id=0040d850-5bec-43c4-8e81-c03a3953c79d&utm_source=share_petition&utm_medium=copylink&utm_campaign=psf_combo_share_message&utm_term=psf_combo_share_initial&share_bandit_exp=message-17005953-en-GB&share_bandit_var=v0
    1 人回報1 則回應7 年前
  • 一位北醫畢業目前在紐約當住院醫師的張銘凱醫師寫照顧COVID-19經驗,寫得非常棒,跟大家分享這篇文章: [經驗分享] 我在紐約市的公立醫院擔任內科住院醫師即將完訓,七月開始會做美國感染科次專訓練。目前紐約災情慘重,我所在醫院確診加疑似病人就超過一百人,我這段其間都在顧ICU因此對於重症COVID的照顧也算有心得,我至少照顧過超過20位以上之住院病人,因為在ICU的關係大部分病人都插管,到目前為止,我應該比許多台灣醫生有武漢新冠肺炎治療之實戰經驗。因為台灣目前防疫做的非常好,多半輕症或無症狀隔離,但是我們隨時要準備如果已經是社區流行,那作為醫生該如何care這些病人,因此做個簡單的分享與教學,所以講解的對象應該是以臨床第一線之醫師或NP為主。但我要說很多evidence都不斷更新,以下是盡量有所依據的臨床處理方式,reference就不一一列舉,有些我可能覺得是一般臨床工作者應有的基本概念也許就沒有多加說明,如造成閱讀上不順暢,也請多多包涵。 #流病學:相信台灣臨床醫生現在非常仰賴旅遊史畢竟沒有大規模社區感染,但是我要提醒的是如果有天已經大流行,旅遊史可能不是那麼重要了,懷疑就該驗。美國之前CDC一直很在意旅遊史而不隨意驗,結果後來發現根本大流行已經來不及了。在大爆發之前,可能會有一個空窗期就是很多原本我們以為低感染風險而沒有驗到的人,他們其實已經可能被感染。此外年輕人或沒有病史病人也非常多,這是在過去醫院前所未見的。在美國輕症就算陽性也不會住院讓他們回家,所以我所看到是真正的病人,我們已經擴充非常多病房了,但是病人真的很多,感染力真的很強要小心!至今我們已經有三個住院醫師中獎了。 #臨床表現:除了發燒咳等呼吸道症狀,還常有拉肚子等GI症狀,我要特別提醒很多病人會有"味覺失調或消失"的症狀,這不是鼻塞引起的味覺降低。很多文獻少提味覺問題,但是一定要注意,這可能是一個sign就該檢驗。此外有些病人會表達胸痛,不一定就是很嚴重的myocarditis,就純粹是無法解釋的胸痛,但還是會建議驗一下CPK/Trop。這個病毒的潛伏期根據我看到的paper,大概平均是五天多,當然最長可能兩個禮拜,不過我現在講的是一個常態分佈的結果,你要算到最嚴苛標準,也許就兩個禮拜,但是平均還是五天多,所以你如果有接觸史,過了一個禮拜還是沒發病,你大概就safe了。 #抽血:CBC(不一定會leukocytosis,反而容易lymphocytopenia and or thrombocytopenia), 常transaminitis(GOT/GPT高)。我們會大概三天監測一次Ferritin, ESR/CRP, LDH, D-dimer來觀察對藥物反應。基本blood culture, HIV, urine Legionella/strep pneumonia最好也住院時驗一下排除其他問題。 #影像:CXR bilateral infiltrations。相信大家一定常常不知道病人什麼問題但是看到CXR有點白白髒髒就當肺炎收進來打抗生素住院(其實可能根本不明顯)。我要說的是這些COVID住院病人,不會只是CXR微微白白髒髒,而是一看就是明顯兩側蔓延,在我住院醫師期間真的從來沒有看到那麼多CXR都是長這個樣子的,現在我幾乎可以看到CXR就診斷。至於CT chest雖然比較清楚,但是我認為不需要,因為大部分CXR就很明顯了,加上抽血上述markers等等就算PCR還沒有等到就可以很有把握診斷了。安排CT chest只會讓醫院感控暴露風險(因為機器要大消毒,浪費時間也可能使真正需要CT的人沒辦法照到) #氧氣治療方面:如果有SOB or hypoxia,當然要監測O2 sat.一開始nasal cannula, simple mask 下一個nonrebreather mask,中間不要試BiPAP/CPAP/High flow NC你就要early intubation了!因為BiPAP等會有把病毒釋放出來空氣傳播的風險。而且COVID病人desaturation or decompensation進展真的非常快!sat keep不住就要early intubation。另外不要使用neubulizer等會霧化的藥物治療,如需支氣管闊張劑可以用MDI手壓的pump。另外ARDS常用的臥趴姿勢prone position效果感覺非常好,病人一prone血氧真的會稍微提升,有些病人甚至沒有被插管的,血氧稍微差一點的我們就會叫他趕快趴著!還真的很有用。很多插管病人我們也會給他prone,我看討論串好像台灣不是很喜歡prone因為很耗費護理師人力,不過至少我在我們醫院我看到是一大早三個主治醫師就一起合力把病人翻姿勢,其實美國醫師工作也是很辛苦的。 #藥物治療: 1.我知道很多診所喜歡開類固醇給"感冒"的病人,但是絕對要避免因為類固醇有延長viral shedding的副作用,之前在MERS等病人的研究也是類固醇壞處大於好處,因此使用類固醇除非是有其indication才用(例如septic shock等等)。 2.高劑量Statin似乎有研究對防止病毒結合有幫助,因此如果LFT, CK允許可以考慮使用(lipitor 40 or 80, etc)。 3.Litonavir愛滋病藥物nejm已經發表確定沒用。 4.在美國我們幾乎每個病人都會給hydroxychloroquine(400mg bid for a day, then 200mg bid for 4 days)會影響lysosome fusion抑制病毒, 使用藥物前一定要EKG,如果QTc>500就不要用。我們醫院現在不加azithromycin了因為兩個一起用會延長QTc就有致死案例。對於法國研究Hydroxychloroquine+azithro很好但是我保持樂觀態度,那個研究病人量很少(n=21),而且我實際臨床經驗覺得幫助好像有限,但是因為in vitro研究有效,我們還是會給病人就是了! COVID似乎會跟其他呼吸道病毒一起co-infection所以還是要驗一下flu, 但是如果flu negative也不需要給tamiflu因為對covid無效。除了病毒還常bacterial superinfection,所以我們幾乎還是會給抗細菌抗生素,macrolide or levofloxacin擔心prolong QT所以我們醫院現在給doxycycline。記得驗一下Urine Legionella因為跟covid一樣都常有GI症狀。 5.Remdesivir在美國第一個case就是靠這個治好的,各國都在臨床試驗中,我個人很看好,我們醫院也要開始實驗這個了... 6.日本藥favipiravir聽說也很成功但是因為我在美國比較不熟。 7.很多COVID病人為什麼這麼sick,明明年輕人卻full blown ARDS比老人更嚴重,因為很多是cytokine release syndrome的關係。所以IL-6 inhibitor如tocilizumab or sarilumab本來治rheumatoid arthritis的生物製劑或許也有用。現階段也還在臨床試驗中,可以抽血IL-6監測。聽說MGH用tocilizumab,而我的醫院也要開始臨床試驗sarilumab #Code status:COVID大部分還是胸腔性疾病,很多就是插管呼吸器ARDS mode來治療,因此插管是很重要的環節。但是有些運氣不是很好的病人,多重器官衰竭等等突然coded需要CPR的情況,這對醫療團隊來說是暴露極高風險甚至多半可能徒勞。我認為有必要一開始就要跟病人談好DNR,這不代表就要DNI,該插管還是要插管,但是真的不幸心跳停止等,要量力而為。 #醫院管理:至少在紐約我們的物資設備都輸台灣很多也嚴重不足,不過也許可以給台灣要是不幸疫情大爆發做個借鏡。現在醫院幾乎都是COVID病人,也不可能一人一間病房了,因此直接把COVID病人直接放在同一間房間,反正都得病了也不怕被感染了。不過還是建議最好病房的門是有窗戶的至少從外面看進去可以知道病人好不好,而且就我剛剛所說,病人原本可能好好的就突然血氧掉非常喘需要趕快插管,每個住院病人真的像未爆彈。另外ICU病人因為常常有很多pump點滴,護理師要一直進出隔離房不方便穿脫PPE,可以考慮直接把pump放在房間外面,點滴線延長出去就好,這樣如果護理師要調sedation or pressors等等就可以不用進入房間更改設定。 #國家防疫:現階段台灣防疫做很好,還在containment的階段,就是把最有可能的人抓出來隔離,但是對於平均每個個案的隔離成本很高,國家也很不容易控制,目前台灣有兩百多的個案,但是某天要是慢慢累積好幾百個病人甚至破千,我們也許就要調整策略,因為把全部只要是陽性的病人都抓到醫院關那是不可能的,台灣沒有那麼多的醫療能量,也不能這樣浪費,而且輕症染病的病人,要多久PCR會轉陰性,我還沒看到研究統計出來,應該也很少人會做這樣研究,因為很少國家會像台灣如此嚴格標準檢疫隔離的,就好像今天得influenza A,如果不太嚴重也是讓病人回家,病癒就是病癒,一般醫師也不會再重複flu swab;同樣如果有C.diff病人,把PO Vanc的療程吃完沒有再拉肚子,你也是當作好了不會再去驗糞便。個人覺得台灣可以把輕症病人平均多久時間PCR轉陰性做個統計發表研究。我最近看了世界著名病毒學專家何大一博士的專訪([https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/tip-iceberg-virologist-david-ho-bs-74-speaks-about-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR1XVnPHq82gD97Y2Y06FkIFzAtNNfopnMgqa98fHAwX7WHzHGyBVbnZlIQ](https://www.caltech.edu/about/news/tip-iceberg-virologist-david-ho-bs-74-speaks-about-covid-19?fbclid=IwAR1XVnPHq82gD97Y2Y06FkIFzAtNNfopnMgqa98fHAwX7WHzHGyBVbnZlIQ)) 個人覺得這篇寫得不錯,裡面他就有寫到目前也不知道陽性的病人過多久後才不會有傳染力,他說猜測大概三週。至於已經得過COVID的病人之後會不會再重複感染,他是覺得應該是不會,也就是現在所有的防疫工作,就是在爭取時間讓疫苗可以製造出來讓群體都可以有保護效果。現階段幾乎的國家都大爆發,就不可能像台灣還在containment的防疫階段,因為你要假設所有人都有可能是病人,那能做的就是#緩和曲線了flatten the curve,我覺得這個概念相當重要 ,基本上就是拖延戰術,減少不必要的社交和聚集,要social distancing,不必要的商業活動要停止,電影院酒吧夜店要關,餐廳只能外帶等等,這可以避免加速接觸感染,讓病人增加量不要達這麼快一下超出醫療能負荷的數量避免醫療崩壞,很多國家都在這麼做了,目前聽起來表現比較好的國家像是南韓,雖然他們一開始防疫沒有做好導致非常多人得病,但是經過大規模檢驗,還有避免出門要待在家等等,目前疫情也有和緩的趨勢,算是亡羊補牢,也不是不行。台灣目前表現全球數一數二,但是我們總是要做最壞的準備跟打算。 #後記:沒想到一下就寫這麼多,這算是我第一線醫療工作者的紀實與經驗分享,目前紐約疫情雖然已嚴重崩壞,但實際上還只是開始而已不見緩和。不過美國參戰之後相信會有更多醫學研究與臨床治療準則可以參考,實際上也不完全是壞事。你問我會不會怕我每天也是提心吊膽的,都很怕生病,每天都要很注意自己的身體狀態,但偏偏美國住院醫師工時非常長(週休一日而已也沒有PM off)又不斷把我們明明不是在病房rotate的時候抓來上班取消我們的門診等等,我都盡量多休息有時間就睡覺保持免疫力。現在在醫院其實也是看到很多恐慌的面孔,我們醫院是公立醫院,平常病人多為社會最底層的人,吸毒的、遊民的、酗酒的,總之各種問題台灣一個比較健康的社會大概很難想像是一個怎麼樣的場所。不過最近因為COVID病人大爆發,我發現很多可能社會上的一般人或中產階級,他們可能是警察、可能是清潔工、就某天感染病毒生病了,這時候醫護站起來照顧他們治療他們,讓他們免於恐懼,這是作為醫學生涯也算比較榮光的時候,因為我們平常的訓練,就在這時候派上用場,也算是找到一點點行醫的意義跟價值。可以平安地活著其實就很好。目前台灣社會可以安全的生活著也真的很好。
    3 人回報1 則回應6 年前
  • 轉分享: 這是中研院生醫所所長郭沛恩院士 (他也是UCSF 教授)寫給前副總統陳健仁及時中部長,関於目前COVID-19 的一些建議,希望政府能夠接納。 Dear VP Chen, Hope that things are going well. I just completed my 9th quarantine after my 9th trip to Taipei during the pandemic and see that the Omicron variant of COVID-19 is now firmly established in Taiwan. While the CECC is moving quickly to address the widening spread of COVID-Omicron and is heading in the right direction, I find that the current policy is unsustainable and the messaging can be much improved. Since I was told that the CECC would welcome my suggestions, I have decided to do so. Please forward this message to the CECC for their consideration. 1. It is now very clear that COVID-Omicron is a very different disease than COVID-ALPHA/BETA/DELTA. Current vaccines are developed from COVID-ALPHA and cannot prevent INFECTION by COVID-Omicron even though they lower significantly the risk of SEVERE DISEASE and DEATH for those who are fully vaccinated and received booster shots recently. In addition, COVID-Omicron is highly contagious and has a very short incubation time; but it causes a milder disease, including shortened disease course and contagious period. 2. Because of the above, contact tracing does not work and avoiding infection is futile except one is in strict isolation or wears a PROPERLY FITTED N95 mask around others (see a very nice article about this in the NYT attached). This means that COVID testing in asymptomatic people is a waste of resources and is justified only in a limited set of situations (such as someone who works closely with vulnerable populations - e.g., nursing home and hospital workers - who has been in close contact with a positive case and needs to test negative to return to work). 3. Although the rate of hospitalization and death due to COVID-Omicron is low, when large populations are infected, the number of severe cases and severe disease is still significant (0.4% of 23 million people hospitalized = 92,000 in the hospital; 0.04% of 23 million people can die = 9,200 deaths) so the key is to keep the vulnerable people from developing severe disease. Medications used for COVID-ALPHA/BETA/DELTA variants such as antibody treatments and Remdesivir, etc., do not work for COVID-Omicron but the oral antivirals from Pfizer and Merck work amazingly well for preventing death (>85% reduction) and hospitalization. Paxlovid has done better in clinical trials to prevent hospitalization but it has many drug-drug interactions so many elderly people cannot use it. Molnupiravir has the theoretical risk of mutagenesis in pregnant women but for the elderly who are past reproductive age, it is a very safe and effective drug to use. I encourage the CECC to contact their counterparts in Japan, Singapore, Israel and the UK to get their experience in using these two oral anti-virals in the recent COVID-Omicron surge. [Full Disclosure: Dr. Dean Li, President of Merck Research Laboratories, is my brother-in-law so I am not pushing the Merck pill for obvious conflict of interest reasons.] Based on the above, my suggestions on messaging are: 1. Tell the country that COVID-Omicron is an entirely different disease than the previous COVID variants so the whole country IS NOT IMMUNE to getting the infection. However, through the sacrifice and cooperation of everyone in Taiwan, the country succeeded in preventing disease and death during the previous waves of infection that caused a lot of problems around the world. This is shared success that the CECC and everyone in Taiwan should take credit, be proud of, and very relieved by. 2. Despite the fact that no one is protected from infection, but because COVID-Omicron is mild, public health policy needs to be adjusted to focus on treating the vulnerable rather than preventing infection of all. 3. Acknowledge that some segments of society have been severely affected by COVID policies so the recovery of these sectors is taken in consideration in updating the public health policy. 4. Acknowledge that some COVID policies were confusing to the public in the past so the new policies will be more consistent and logical. For example, the policy of requiring masking outdoors while people eating at restaurants indoors are not required to mask makes no sense. My suggestions for the new policy are geared towards lowering hospitalization and death rates while avoiding unnecessary disruptions in people's lives: 1. Push vaccination for vulnerable groups (the elderly and those with pre-existing conditions that make them more prone to severe disease). Send vaccination nurses to the nursing homes and neighborhoods with elderly people to get everyone fully vaccinated (including booster shots). Getting the 30% of those 65-75 and 44% of elderly >75 who have not been fully vaccinated and boosted should be a high priority 2. Use the "test positive and treat" strategy for those in vulnerable groups. As I mentioned before, Paxlovid for all but Molnupiravir for those who cannot take Paxlovid. Treat them before their symptoms get worse because it is cheaper to give them the medicine than risk their need for hospitalization. 3. No more putting those with mild disease in special facilities or hospitals so that there are plenty of capacity for those who need hospitalization. 4. Recommend (not mandate with threat of punishment) those who have close contact with COVID-Omicron patients to mask around others for 5 days (no need to do so with household members because they are already given it to them) if they are asymptomatic. 5. No testing of asymptomatic people unless their job requires it (nursing home, hospital, etc.). 6. No more closing schools, factories, or offices because of positive COVID-Omicron cases. 7. No more mandatory masking except for those described in #4 above. People here are so used to masking that many will still do so with the threat of punishment. 8. No more mandatory quarantine, even for those who test positive. Highly recommend those who test positive to wear a mask when around people and not eat with others but not make it a punishable offense. [Treat them like people who have a bad flu, not like criminals.] 9. No more testing or quarantine requirements for visitors from abroad. As the local infection rate is now higher than that many other countries, there is no reason to require new arrivals to do anything different when they are asymptomatic. It's confusing to many that I can go anywhere in the world without quarantine but have to do quarantine plus multiple tests when arriving in Taiwan (and a handful of Asian countries). The benefit of the policies listed above is that the resources of the country are directed toward saving lives rather than collecting lots of infection data. It will reclaim the international travel hub status of Taoyuan International Airport (and not let Singapore and Seoul dominate the air travel sector) and revive the tourism, convention, airline, hotel businesses. It will simplify everyone's life and reduce anxiety. It may be counter intuitive but if you look at the data from the US university campuses and European countries, it is better to get as many young people infected as quickly as possible to shorten the surge while building up herd immunity for COVID-Omicron without a lot of severe cases. The old policy for flattening the curve is to prevent overwhelming the hospitals but with oral antivirals and milder disease, there is no need to flatten the curve. It is better to get the whole surge completed in 2 months like in most countries that pursue a more open policy. I am convinced that when the messaging is clear and based on current understanding of the situation, the people will embrace it and praise the CECC's leadership. Best, Pui -- Pui-Yan Kwok, MD, PhD Director, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Academia Sinica
    11 人回報1 則回應4 年前
  • 以色列卫生部|辉瑞疫苗杀死的老年人比疾病本身杀死的老年人多40倍 2021年3月5日 摘要 以色列卫生部的最新分析得出结论,在最近5周的疫苗接种期间,辉瑞公司的新冠病毒疫苗导致的死亡人数”大约是该病毒本身导致死亡人数的40倍”,而年轻人的死亡人数则是病毒导致死亡人数的260倍。 以色列卫生部|辉瑞疫苗杀死的老年人比疾病本身杀死的老年人多40倍 New analysis from the Israeli Health Ministry concluded Pfizer's COVID vaccine killed"about 40 times more(elderly)people than the disease itself would have killed"during a recent five-week vaccination period,and 260 times more younger people than would have died from the virus. 以色列卫生部的最新分析得出结论,在最近5周的疫苗接种期间,辉瑞公司的新冠病毒疫苗导致的死亡人数"大约是该病毒本身导致死亡人数的40倍",而年轻人的死亡人数则是病毒导致死亡人数的260倍。 While in January a group of independent doctors concluded that experimental COVID-19 vaccines are"not safer"than the virus itself,a new analysis of vaccine-related death rates in Israel demonstrates that this may indeed be the case to dramatic levels. 今年1月,一组独立医生得出结论,实验性的2019冠状病毒疾病疫苗并不比病毒本身更安全,但对以色列与疫苗相关的死亡率进行的一项新分析表明,情况可能确实如此,达到了惊人的水平。 A re-analysis of published data from the Israeli Health Ministry by Dr.Hervé Seligmann,a member of the faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases at Aix-Marseille University,and engineer Haim Yativ reveal,in short,that the mRNA experimental vaccine from Pfizer killed"about 40 times more(elderly)people than the disease itself would have killed"during a recent five-week vaccination period.Among the younger class,these numbers are compounded to death rates at 260 times what the COVID-19 virus would have claimed in the given time frame. 艾克斯-马赛大学医学新兴传染病和热带疾病学院的 hervé Seligmann 博士和工程师 Haim Yativ 对以色列卫生部公布的数据进行了重新分析,简而言之,辉瑞公司的 mRNA 实验疫苗在最近五周的疫苗接种期间造成的死亡人数比疾病本身造成的死亡人数多40倍。在年轻一代中,这些数字加起来的死亡率是2019冠状病毒疾病病毒在给定时间范围内的死亡率的260倍。 While the full mathematical analysis may be found in the article itself,the authors demonstrate how among"those vaccinated and above 65,0.2%…died during the three-week period between doses,hence about 200 among 100,000 vaccinated.This is to be compared to the 4.91 dead among 100,000 dying from COVID-19 without vaccination." 虽然完整的数学分析可以在文章本身中找到,但是作者证明了"那些接种疫苗和超过65,0.2%的人......是如何在三周期间死亡的,因此在100,000接种疫苗的人中大约有200人。"。这个数字可以和没有接种疫苗的100,000名死于2019冠状病毒疾病中的4.91人相提并论 "This scary picture also extends to those below 65,"the researchers continued.During the five-week vaccination process"0.05%,meaning 50 among 100,000,died.This is to be compared to the 0.19 per 100,000 dying from COVID-19(who)are not vaccinated…Hence the death rate of this age group increased by 260(times)during this five-week period of the vaccination process,as compared to their natural COVID-19 death rate." 研究人员继续说:"这种可怕的情况也延伸到了65岁以下的人群。"在为期五周的疫苗接种过程中,"0.05%,即10万人中有50人死亡。因此,在这五周的疫苗接种过程中,这个年龄组的死亡率比他们的自然死亡率增加了260倍,而他们的自然死亡率为每100,000人中有0.19人,没有接种2019冠状病毒疾病......因此,这个年龄组的死亡率比他们的自然2019冠状病毒疾病死亡率增加了260倍 As reported by IsraelNationalNews(INN),Seligmann is of Israeli-Luxembourg nationality,has a biology degree from Hebrew University of Jerusalem,and has written more than 100 scientific publications.INN reports the researchers"have no conflicts or interests other than having children in Israel." 据以色列国家新闻报道,塞利格曼是以色列-卢森堡国籍,拥有希伯来大学的生物学学位,并发表过100多篇科学论文。国家旅游局报告说,研究人员"除了在以色列生孩子之外,没有其他利益冲突。" Yativ and Seligmann stipulate that even these"estimated numbers of deaths from the vaccine are probably much lower than actual numbers as it accounts only for those defined as COVID-19 deaths for that short time period and does not include AVC and cardiac(and other)events resulting from the inflammatory reactions." Yativ 和 Seligmann 规定,即使这些"估计的疫苗死亡人数也可能远远低于实际数字,因为它只包括那些在短时间内被定义为2019冠状病毒疾病死亡的人,而不包括由炎症反应导致的动静脉畸形和心脏(以及其他)事件。" Nor do these numbers"account for long-term complications,"they write. 他们写道,这些数字也不能"解释长期并发症"。 In addition,within several months they expect"mid-and long-term adverse effects of the vaccination as ADE(Antibody-dependent Enhancement)"begins to become manifest in those who have received the experimental Pfizer vaccine. 此外,在几个月内,他们预计"中期和长期的不良反应疫苗接种作为 ADE(抗体依赖性增强作用)"开始成为明显的那些已经接受实验辉瑞疫苗。 As explained by America's Frontline Doctors(AFLDS),ADE"is when anti-COVID antibodies,created by a vaccine,instead of protecting the person,cause a more severe or lethal disease when the person is later exposed to SARS-CoV-2 in the wild.The vaccine amplifies the infection rather than preventing damage." 正如美国前线医生(AFLDS)解释的那样,ADE"是指当人后来在野外暴露于 SARS-CoV-2时,由疫苗产生的抗Covid 抗体,而不是保护人体,导致更严重或致命的疾病。这种疫苗加重了感染,而不是防止了损害。" AFLDS provides an example of a vaccine produced to fight the Dengue fever,which resulted in deaths of 600 children in the Philippines due to ADE,and the filing of criminal charges against the decision-makers in 2019. 菲律宾儿童和青少年司提供了一个为防治登革热而生产疫苗的例子,登革热在菲律宾造成600名儿童死亡,2019年对决策者提出了刑事指控。 For these reasons and more,AFLDS and many other doctors strongly discourage the use of these experimental vaccines for most people while only acknowledging that it may be plausible for those over 70 years of age,yet acknowledging that such injections are"a higher risk than early or prophylactic treatment with established medications"(sources here, here, here, and here). 由于这些原因以及更多的原因,AFLDS 和许多其他医生强烈反对大多数人使用这些实验性疫苗,同时只承认这对70岁以上的人来说可能是合理的,但也承认这种注射"比早期或使用现有药物进行预防性治疗的风险更高"(来源是这里、这里、这里和这里)。 Given these death rates,Yativ and Seligmann also have harsh criticism for the severe pressure being imposed upon the population by Israeli authorities to receive these shots.According to INN,the researchers call these draconian efforts"a new Holocaust." 鉴于这些死亡率,Yativ 和 Seligmann 也受到严厉批评,因为以色列当局对居民施加了接受这些射击的严厉压力。国际犹太人学院称,研究人员将这些严酷的努力称为"新的大屠杀" In the past weeks,Israel's government made headlines when they adopted a"green pass"system,allowing people who have been injected to receive a green code,which then grants them entry into places such as entertainment and leisure facilities. 过去几周,以色列政府采用了"绿色通行证"制度,允许被注射者获得绿色代码,然后允许他们进入娱乐和休闲设施等场所。 As the country reopens after a two-month lockdown,the green pass would be given only to those who had been injected,not to people who tested negative for the virus.The proposed benefits include access to"non-essential"businesses as well as not being required to self-isolate if identified as a close contact of a confirmed case of COVID-19,and not having to self-isolate after a return from what the government calls a"red location." 随着这个国家在两个月的封锁后重新开放,绿色通行证将只发给那些被注射的人,而不是那些病毒检测呈阴性的人。拟议的好处包括可以进入"非必要"的企业,如果被确认为确诊的2019冠状病毒疾病病例的密切接触者,不必自我隔离,也不必在从政府所谓的"红色地点"返回后自我隔离 Despite there being no proof that these experimental vaccines actually prevent transmission of the virus,Israel's minister for health,Yuli Edelstein,said upon the release of the vaccine"passport"that"(g)etting vaccinated is a moral duty.It is part of our mutual responsibility."He went further,declaring,"Whoever does not get vaccinated will be left behind." 尽管没有证据表明这些实验性疫苗实际上能够阻止病毒的传播,但以色列卫生部长 Yuli Edelstein 在疫苗"护照"发放时表示,"(g)接种疫苗是一种道德义务。这是我们共同责任的一部分。"他更进一步,宣称:"不接种疫苗的人将被留下。" The green pass needs renewing every six months,and despite holding one,an individual must still abide by masking and physical distancing rules.The Jerusalem Post also reported that legislation is being considered to grant employers the right to refuse unvaccinated people entry into the workplace. 绿色通行证需要每六个月更新一次,尽管持有绿色通行证,个人仍然必须遵守伪装和物理距离规则。《耶路撒冷邮报》还报告说,正在考虑通过立法给予雇主拒绝未接种疫苗的人进入工作场所的权利。 Such measures prompted Business Insider to describe the country as"waging a war on the unvaccinated."Meanwhile,Dr.Anthony Fauci,chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden,has styled Israel's vaccination response as"extraordinarily good." 这些措施促使商业内幕组织将这个国家描述为"向未接种疫苗的人发动战争"与此同时,总统乔·拜登的首席医疗顾问安东尼·福奇博士将以色列的疫苗接种反应形容为"非常好" 来源: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/experimental-vaccine-death-rate-for-israels-elderly-40-times-higher-than-covid-19-deaths-researchers
    5 人回報1 則回應5 年前
  • 轉po: 預估兩週潛伏期 Lancet論文統計指出 兩成 不發燒 七成 會咳嗽 症狀非常不典型! 一週後發病 發病後一週 32% 加護病房 29% ARDS插管急救 15% 死亡終結 意思是 重症一半會死! 機率大概 比六發子彈 直接開一槍的 俄羅斯輪盤低一些~ 中國官方還告訴大家沒事兒不要怕?! 我身為 高雄榮總 急診一線醫師 加護病房主治醫師 我目前想不到有什麼其他比這個更嚴重更糟糕的傳染病了🙏 Lancet https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30183-5/fulltext
    1 人回報1 則回應6 年前
  • 48小時前,湯姆·漢克斯因戀童癖被捕,目前他被關在澳洲的一家酒店房間裏,不願意飛回美國。下一個被捕的名人是席琳·迪翁、麥當娜、查爾斯·巴克利(Charles Barkley)和凱文·史派西(Kevin Space)。所有人都聲稱感染了冠狀病毒。 意大利的機場已經完全關閉,80多名梵蒂岡和財政官員因金融犯罪、戀童癖、拐賣兒童和性虐待而受到同樣的刑事指控。 阿拉伯聯合酋長國已經完成了對其皇室家族和分支機構的大規模逮捕。...~~ 詳見https://blog.xuite.net/tonycjones/twblog/588989360
    1 人回報1 則回應6 年前