訊息原文

1 人回報1 則回應7 個月前
2. 規模與人數碾壓
英文:“They have one million people working on this 24/7. One million. Not 100,000 — one million. You know how many we have in the entire Silicon Valley working full-time on foundation models? Maybe 20,000 on a good day.”

中文:“他們有100萬人24小時不停地在幹這個。100萬!不是10萬,是100萬。你們知道整個矽谷全職做大模型的能有多少人?最多兩天20,000人。”

3. 決心與鬥志
英文:“And they’re not going to quit. They’re not going to quit. The more you sanction them, the harder they work. You can’t stop them. The more you stop them, the more determined they get.”

中文:“而且他們不會放棄。他們不會放棄。你越制裁他們,他們幹得越狠。你根本攔不住他們。你越攔,他們越越來越勁。”

現有回應

增加新回應

  • 撰寫回應
  • 使用相關回應 10
  • 搜尋

你可能也會對這些類似文章有興趣

  • 2025年11月5日晚,台北君悅酒店頂級私人包廂內,僅有12位受邀嘉賓(包括台積電、廣達、緯創、鴻海高管,以及兩家美國創投合夥人)參與會面;現場完全閉門、無錄音、無手機,原本約定為off-record(非公開記錄) 黃仁勳完整發言(逐序還原) 1. 開場直接下判斷 英文:“If you ask me who’s going to win the generative AI race in the next 5-10 years — China is going to win. Period.” 中文:“如果你們問我未來5-10年生成式AI競賽誰會贏——中國會贏。就這麼簡單。” 2. 規模與人數碾壓 英文:“They have one million people working on this 24/7. One million. Not 100,000 — one million. You know how many we have in the entire Silicon Valley working full-time on foundation models? Maybe 20,000 on a good day.” 中文:“他們有100萬人24小時不停地在幹這個。100萬!不是10萬,是100萬。你們知道整個矽谷全職做大模型的能有多少人?最多兩天20,000人。” 3. 決心與鬥志 英文:“And they’re not going to quit. They’re not going to quit. The more you sanction them, the harder they work. You can’t stop them. The more you stop them, the more determined they get.” 中文:“而且他們不會放棄。他們不會放棄。你越制裁他們,他們幹得越狠。你根本攔不住他們。你越攔,他們越越來越勁。” 4. 美國製裁適得其反 英文:“These export controls? They’re the dumbest thing we’ve ever done. You just gave them the best national mobilization mission in 50 years. It’s like Sputnik moment on steroids.” 中文:“這些出口管制?是我們幹過的最蠢的事。你就是給了他們50年來最好的全國總動員任務。這就跟吃了類固醇的斯普特尼克時刻一樣。” 5. 對華為的評價 英文:“Don’t underestimate Huawei. Their Ascend 910C is already within 8-12% of H100 performance in most workloads — and they make 200,000 of them per month now. Two hundred thousand. Per month. While we’re sitting here arguing about CFIUS.” 中文:“別低估華為。他們的昇騰910C在大多數負載下已經只比H100慢8-12%——而且他們現在每月能造20萬片。20萬片!每個月!而我們還在這兒為CFIUS吵得不可開交。” 6. 對美國政府的直接批評 英文:“Washington thinks they’re stopping China. They’re not stopping China — they’re accelerating China. By 2027, China will have more AI compute than the rest of the world combined. Mark my words.” 中文:“華盛頓以為他們在阻止中國。其實他們不是在阻止中國——他們是在加速中國。到2027年,中國將擁有比全世界其他國家加起來還多的AI算力。記住我的話。” 7. 結尾一針見血 英文:“So yeah, keep the sanctions if you want. Just understand: you’re handing them the trophy.” 中文:“所以你們想繼續制裁就繼續吧。只要明白:你們是在親手把獎盃遞給他們。” 當晚就有3位與會者將內容洩露給FT(金融時報)記者;11月6日凌晨FT搶先爆料,隨後彭博、路透逐句求證,內容全部一致;輝達公關團隊至今僅回覆“No comment”(無可奉告); 黃仁勳本人已取消原定11月6日的所有媒體採訪;這是目前網路上能找到的最完整、最一手、最逐句的黃仁勳原話。 (IT前哨站) https://hao.cnyes.com/post/205291
    38 人回報1 則回應7 個月前
  • 6. 對美國政府的直接批評 英文:“Washington thinks they’re stopping China. They’re not stopping China — they’re accelerating China. By 2027, China will have more AI compute than the rest of the world combined. Mark my words.” 中文:“華盛頓以為他們在阻止中國。其實他們不是在阻止中國——他們是在加速中國。到2027年,中國將擁有比全世界其他國家加起來還多的AI算力。記住我的話。” 7. 結尾一針見血 英文:“So yeah, keep the sanctions if you want. Just understand: you’re handing them the trophy.” 中文:“所以你們想繼續制裁就繼續吧。只要明白:你們是在親手把獎盃遞給他們。”
    1 人回報1 則回應7 個月前
  • 大家好。 早安。 你冷嗎? 不。 我看見你做這個。 雖然是70度。 這是我第一次在這裡。 我很緊張。 你緊張的時候,你去法庭? 對,這是我第一次。 這是你第一次在法庭? 對。 到現在,你還好嗎? 到現在。 對。 我覺得今天是夜店日, 法官 Quinn。 Janelle has four overnight parking tickets all at the same location. So, what do you want to tell me about these, Janelle? I just want to know if I'm able to pay in October because I start my job on October 5th and my card isn't registered, so I wasn't able to get the permit sticker yet because my card gets registered in November. What do you do for work? Are you working? No, not yet. I'm going to be working at St. Tanner's on October 5th. And what did you do? What was your last job? Walmart. You worked at Walmart? Yeah. You're in sales. Are you a good salesperson? Yeah. You're going to work at a bank now, huh? At St. Tanner? Yes. Yeah. You're going to be what? You're going to be chief operating officer? What are you going to do? I'm customer service, taking... See, she's a good person. All of a sudden, we're going to have to smile, Inspector Quinn. Smile a little more and give me the keys to the vault. Let's work on that one. All right. These overnight parking tickets, is this because you did not have a parking spot? Is that an area where you live? Yeah, it's very full, so I have to park outside on the streets. Do you have a parking spot now? No, once I get my card registered, I'm going to get the ticket for it. The fines are $200 now because they all tripled. I'm going to fine you $20. I'm going to fine you for one of these tickets. And I'm going to give you all the time you need to pay it. I mean, who do you live with? You live with your parents, you live alone, you live with... It's just me and my daughter. We rent a place. Your daughter? You have a young daughter? How old is she? Ten months. Ten months? It's just you and she? Yeah. Oh. What's her name? Camila. We can't let you pay $20 because then, I don't know, maybe when you go home tonight, you need some food for the baby and if you pay $20 here, maybe you won't be able to afford the food, so I'm not going to do that. We have to take the baby into consideration in respect to Camila. And right now, she's like between a rock and a hard place. She wants to buy the parking passes. She can't because the registry isn't accommodating those right now. Right? And she's looking to do that. And she doesn't have a job, but she's got a little baby. So, when I can't take care of a ten-month-old child, I know I can't do that. There are a whole bunch of things you can do. You have nothing. Nothing. Your story really touches me. You only have one child. I guess you have a lot of challenges being a single mom. What is the biggest challenge? Taking care of the baby the whole night. You're dedicated to the baby. There are a lot of generous people in this country. We are on social media, and we are on television, and people throughout the world see what happens in this courtroom. And they send in contributions voluntarily and ask me to give them to people, I think, to use them toward people who I think are worthy, and you certainly are. So, I have a gentleman actually from Eustis, Florida, by the name of Gary Ashcraft. He sent in $25 and said, please use this to help a single mom who's doing everything she can to help her children. That's you. So, I'm going to use that $25 to pay for your ticket. But I'm going to do a little bit more than that. I mean, since you came in broke today, there are an awful lot of people who send in some money here. So, I don't want you leaving here today and not having enough money to take care of your baby. So, I am going to, with the generosity of people from throughout the country who have sent in cash, I am going to give you $50 in cash for you to use to take care of your baby. Thank you. And you put that to good use. Thank you so much. Anything you want to say to the person who sent in that money? I'll always say thank you so much, and I really do appreciate it.
    4 人回報1 則回應4 年前
  • The fact is these are life shortening injections. Everyone who gets shot after shot after shot of these COVID shots is shortening their life with each and single injection. These are the most toxic medical agents put into human beings in history. Don't take a shot that's going to damage your immune system. Don't let your children take a shot that's going to damage their ovaries for life. As a 12 year old, are they going to be fertile when they're 24 or 25 if they've had massive inflammation induced into their own ovaries? Because this shot was designed to cross into the ovary barrier. This shot was designed to cross into the brain barrier. This shot was designed to go everywhere. And that's why people are dying in such strange circumstances, unexplained circumstances, but the numbers are horrific. 10 to 14 year olds die 82 times more likely if vaccinated than not. 82 to 100 times more mortality in vaccinated 10 to 14 year olds than those who are not. We don't have the numbers for the 5 to 9 year olds because no one's been brave enough to do the statistics. I shudder to think what they'd be if they ever did it honestly, but they were stuck doing it honestly. They did it honestly in 2020 into 2021. The only time that an exact observable comparable testing of children's was done and it was done by the British. And when it came out on February 22nd and then again on May 31st and showed that if vaccinated 10 to 14 year olds died 82 times more than if they were left alone. So in common sense terms, if you want your child to be 82 to 100 times more likely to die this next year, get them another COVID bio genomic shot. Get them another one. You'll be making them 82 times more likely to die. And I am accurate about that. I am not telling you something that's not true. This is the truth. Please take care of your children. Please take care of yourselves and please never take another COVID shot. It is the only way out of this.
    1 人回報1 則回應4 年前
  • The fact is these are life shortening injections. Everyone who gets shot after shot after shot of these COVID shots is shortening their life with each and single injection. These are the most toxic medical agents put into human beings in history. Don't take a shot that's going to damage your immune system. Don't let your children take a shot that's going to damage their ovaries for life. As a 12 year old, are they going to be fertile when they're 24 or 25 if they've had massive inflammation induced into their own ovaries? Because this shot was designed to cross into the ovary barrier. This shot was designed to cross into the brain barrier. This shot was designed to go everywhere. And that's why people are dying in such strange circumstances, unexplained circumstances, but the numbers are horrific. 10 to 14 year olds die 82 times more likely if vaccinated than not. 82 to 100 times more mortality in vaccinated 10 to 14 year olds than those who are not. We don't have the numbers for the 5 to 9 year olds because no one's been brave enough to do the statistics. I shudder to think what they'd be if they ever did it honestly, but they were stuck doing it honestly. They did it honestly in 2020 into 2021. The only time that an exact observable comparable testing of children's was done and it was done by the British. And when it came out on February 22nd and then again on May 31st and showed that if vaccinated 10 to 14 year olds died 82 times more than if they were left alone. So in common sense terms, if you want your child to be 82 to 100 times more likely to die this next year, get them another COVID bio genomic shot. Get them another one. You'll be making them 82 times more likely to die. And I am accurate about that. I am not telling you something that's not true. This is the truth. Please take care of your children. Please take care of yourselves and please never take another COVID shot. It is the only way out of this.
    2 人回報1 則回應3 年前
  • The fact is these are life shortening injections. Everyone who gets shot after shot after shot of these COVID shots is shortening their life with each and single injection. These are the most toxic medical agents put into human beings in history. Don't take a shot that's going to damage your immune system. Don't let your children take a shot that's going to damage their ovaries for life. As a 12 year old, are they going to be fertile when they're 24 or 25 if they've had massive inflammation induced into their own ovaries? Because this shot was designed to cross into the ovary barrier. This shot was designed to cross into the brain barrier. This shot was designed to go everywhere. And that's why people are dying in such strange circumstances, unexplained circumstances, but the numbers are horrific. 10 to 14 year olds die 82 times more likely if vaccinated than not. 82 to 100 times more mortality in vaccinated 10 to 14 year olds than those who are not. We don't have the numbers for the 5 to 9 year olds because no one's been brave enough to do the statistics. I shudder to think what they'd be if they ever did it honestly, but they were stuck doing it honestly. They did it honestly in 2020 into 2021. The only time that an exact observable comparable testing of children's was done and it was done by the British. And when it came out on February 22nd and then again on May 31st and showed that if vaccinated 10 to 14 year olds died 82 times more than if they were left alone. So in common sense terms, if you want your child to be 82 to 100 times more likely to die this next year, get them another COVID bio genomic shot. Get them another one. You'll be making them 82 times more likely to die. And I am accurate about that. I am not telling you something that's not true. This is the truth. Please take care of your children. Please take care of yourselves and please never take another COVID shot. It is the only way out of this.
    5 人回報1 則回應4 年前
  • The fact is these are life shortening injections. Everyone who gets shot after shot after shot of these COVID shots is shortening their life with each and single injection. These are the most toxic medical agents put into human beings in history. Don't take a shot that's going to damage your immune system. Don't let your children take a shot that's going to damage their ovaries for life. As a 12 year old, are they going to be fertile when they're 24 or 25 if they've had massive inflammation induced into their own ovaries? Because this shot was designed to cross into the ovary barrier. This shot was designed to cross into the brain barrier. This shot was designed to go everywhere and that's why people are dying in such strange circumstances, unexplained circumstances, but the numbers are horrific. 10 to 14 year olds die 82 times more likely if vaccinated than not. 82 to 100 times more mortality in vaccinated 10 to 14 year olds than those who are not. We don't have the numbers for the 5 to 9 year olds because no one's been brave enough to do the statistics. I shudder to think what they'd be if they ever did it honestly, but they were stuck doing it honestly. They did it honestly in 2020 into 2021. The only time that an exact observable comparable testing of children's was done and it was done by the British and when it came out on February 22nd and then again on May 31st and showed that if vaccinated 10 to 14 year olds died 82 times more than if they were left alone. So in common sense terms if you want your child to be 82 to 100 times more likely to die this next year, get them another COVID biogenomic shot. Get them another one. You'll be making them 82 times more likely to die and I am accurate about that. I am not telling you something that's not true. This is the truth. Please take care of your children. Please take care of yourselves and please never take another COVID shot. It is the only way out of this.
    4 人回報1 則回應4 年前
  • The fact is these are life shortening injections. Everyone who gets shot after shot after shot of these COVID shots is shortening their life with each and single injection. These are the most toxic medical agents put into human beings in history. Don't take a shot that's going to damage your immune system. Don't let your children take a shot that's going to damage their ovaries for life. As a 12-year-old, are they going to be fertile when they're 24 or 25 if they've had massive inflammation induced into their own ovaries? Because this shot was designed to cross into the ovary barrier. This shot was designed to cross into the brain barrier. This shot was designed to go everywhere. And that's why people are dying in such strange circumstances, unexplained circumstances, but the numbers are horrific. 10 to 14-year-olds die 82 times more likely if vaccinated than not. 82 to 100 times more mortality in vaccinated 10 to 14-year-olds than those who are not. We don't have the numbers for the 5 to 9-year-olds because no one's been brave enough to do the statistics. I shudder to think what they'd be if they ever did it honestly. But they were stuck doing it honestly. They did it honestly in 2020 into 2021. The only time that an exact observable, comparable testing of children was done. And it was done by the British. And when it came out on February 22nd, and then again on May 31st, and showed that if vaccinated, 10 to 14-year-olds died 82 times more than if they were left alone. So in common sense terms, if you want your child to be 82 to 100 times more likely to die this next year, get them another COVID biogenomic shot. Get them another one. You'll be making them 82 times more likely to die. And I am accurate about that. I am not telling you something that's not true. This is the truth. Please take care of your children. Please take care of yourselves. And please never take another COVID shot. It is the only way out of this.
    5 人回報1 則回應4 年前
  • Adam Rogas – CEO and Co-Founder of NS8 by IdeaMensch · Nov 30, 2016 287Share Tweet 66Share Adam-e1480959343307 Find a problem you think you can solve and really focus on it. Resist the urge to move from that problem until you have demonstrated by positive user feedback and growth that you have actually solved it. Adam Rogas is the CEO and Co-Founder of NS8. With over 14 years of senior development and management expertise, as well as extensive knowledge in the fields of online fraud and spam filtering, Adam brings a tremendous amount to NS8. He was a founder of LoadMail and has worked as a trusted advisor to Postini, London Board of Tourism, Vivendi Universal, and Napster. In each case, Adam has helped implement big data, email, spam and virus filtering, and data security solutions. Mr. Rogas has architected extremely large-scale spam and virus filtering platforms, dealing with well over 100,000 messages per hour. He has also played a central role in the architecture of numerous large scale analysts solutions. Adam brings his love for safe, effective communication and startup ventures to NS8. He is married and also calls Las Vegas, Nevada home. Where did the idea for NS8 come from? My partners and I have run some significant and highly transactional websites and services prior to NS8. We understood that the common threads of fraud, abuse and poor user experience affected each of them in some way, shape, or form. Knowing this, we felt there had to be a better way to protect these types of sites and services, from being abused, regardless of their size. We also knew that any solution we created had to be easy to deploy, manage, and understand. What does your typical day look like and how do you make it productive? In an early stage company you are wearing lots of hats. I work a ton of hours. So, the key for me, is to keep my thoughts organized. I usually divide my day up into 3 or 4 segments and then identify what I think I can accomplish in each one of them. Once I do this, I make a list for each segment. This gives me a semblance of structure to my day that helps me get my mind right for the tasks I have to tackle. It also helps me walk away and not overthink the ones I have already completed. How do you bring ideas to life? I usually start with an idea or something that would really matter to a specifc group of people and then I start asking questions. I will then usually build some simple example, or take steps to create what I’m trying to do, and show it to people get feedback and repeat until I reach my goal. What’s one trend that really excites you? It has gotten easier and easier to bring big ideas to life, and to compete, due to the growth of cloud services. To me, it really levels the playing field for a lot of ideas, that just 5 years ago, would have been impossible for all but the largest companies to bring to life. What is one habit of yours that makes you more productive as an entrepreneur? I try to be fairly aware of my own ADD and so I will make lists to hold myself accountable for the items on them. I also try to solve this problem in our hiring practices by surrounding myself with people that are very detail and process focused. What advice would you give your younger self? Find a problem you think you can solve and really focus on it. Resist the urge to move from that problem until you have demonstrated by positive user feedback and growth that you have actually solved it. If you do that, and continue to do it over and over again, you will be successful. Tell us something that’s true that almost nobody agrees with you on? That I am a good singer ? I don’t know that I am very persuasive here …. but I do know I can’t sing. As an entrepreneur, what is the one thing you do over and over and recommend everyone else do? I am constantly talking to our customers. I try to involve them early on, and very often in our process. This is one area I struggle with as we evolve and scale our product development processes, but it is critical to maintaining that connection as to why your customers want your product in the first place. What is one strategy that has helped you grow your business? Please explain how. Surrounding myself with supremely talented people and partners. It has been instrumental to my own growth and the growth of my businesses. What is one failure you had as an entrepreneur, and how did you overcome it? That would probably be my first company, Load Ltd. Load was a hosted application service provider before there was a term for Software As A Service (SaaS). We had a popular email product called LoadMail, that was used by a number of major companies. About 1 year into the business we chose to offer additional services above and beyond just mail and it was this decision that would prove to be our failure. As a team, we didn’t fully understand how diversifying our focus would negatively impact our effectiveness. I tell everyone who asks for advice to pick a problem you can solve and focus on solving it well. Successful entrepreneurs have one thing in common — they never give up. What is one business idea that you’re willing to give away to our readers? I like ideas that take subject knowledge and find a way to productize it. One idea I had was to do this for athletic departments in D1 schools, so they could crowdsource from their athletes, managers, and students the creation of social marketing content. They could then manage it from a centrally controllable compliance system. Or Plastics !! Invest in Plastics (god I’m old) What is the best $100 you recently spent? What and why? Money spent on experiences, dinner with my wife or friends, or money that helps someone. Recently, since we are living across the country from each other, it would be dinner with my wife the last time I was at home in Las Vegas. What is one piece of software or a web service that helps you be productive? How do you use it? Slack. It helps our entire team communicate. What is the one book that you recommend our community should read and why? “Start With Why” by Simon Sinek. It helps you think about what you are building in a way that really focuses on how it will be consumed by those whom you are selling it to. What is your favorite quote? “Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm.” -Winston Churchill Tell us about one friend or acquaintance of yours who we should interview on IdeaMensch. Who are they, what are they doing and what’s their email address? I actually have two Nick Jones, Nick and I started what was our first real company together Load Ltd along with my current business partner Paul Korol. Nick’s is currently working on a great project focused on personal and affinity based content creation called JRNL.com, they have recently been through boom Startup a SaaS focused startup accelerator in Salt Lake City and have just completed a seed round of funding. John Njoku, John is working on a great project RentHub.com, which is at the intersection of Multifamily Residential Realestate and Big Data Analytics. RentHub has some huge clients such as StarWood capital and The Lefrak Organization and has recently completed the Elmspring accelerator based in Chicago. Contact : https://www.ns8.com/ LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ns8 Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ns8inc Twitter: @ns8inc 287Share Tweet 66Share Filed Under: Interviews, Software, Technology Tagged With: Herndon, Virginia https://ideamensch.com/adam-rogas/
    1 人回報1 則回應9 年前
  • 轉分享: 這是中研院生醫所所長郭沛恩院士 (他也是UCSF 教授)寫給前副總統陳健仁及時中部長,関於目前COVID-19 的一些建議,希望政府能夠接納。 Dear VP Chen, Hope that things are going well. I just completed my 9th quarantine after my 9th trip to Taipei during the pandemic and see that the Omicron variant of COVID-19 is now firmly established in Taiwan. While the CECC is moving quickly to address the widening spread of COVID-Omicron and is heading in the right direction, I find that the current policy is unsustainable and the messaging can be much improved. Since I was told that the CECC would welcome my suggestions, I have decided to do so. Please forward this message to the CECC for their consideration. 1. It is now very clear that COVID-Omicron is a very different disease than COVID-ALPHA/BETA/DELTA. Current vaccines are developed from COVID-ALPHA and cannot prevent INFECTION by COVID-Omicron even though they lower significantly the risk of SEVERE DISEASE and DEATH for those who are fully vaccinated and received booster shots recently. In addition, COVID-Omicron is highly contagious and has a very short incubation time; but it causes a milder disease, including shortened disease course and contagious period. 2. Because of the above, contact tracing does not work and avoiding infection is futile except one is in strict isolation or wears a PROPERLY FITTED N95 mask around others (see a very nice article about this in the NYT attached). This means that COVID testing in asymptomatic people is a waste of resources and is justified only in a limited set of situations (such as someone who works closely with vulnerable populations - e.g., nursing home and hospital workers - who has been in close contact with a positive case and needs to test negative to return to work). 3. Although the rate of hospitalization and death due to COVID-Omicron is low, when large populations are infected, the number of severe cases and severe disease is still significant (0.4% of 23 million people hospitalized = 92,000 in the hospital; 0.04% of 23 million people can die = 9,200 deaths) so the key is to keep the vulnerable people from developing severe disease. Medications used for COVID-ALPHA/BETA/DELTA variants such as antibody treatments and Remdesivir, etc., do not work for COVID-Omicron but the oral antivirals from Pfizer and Merck work amazingly well for preventing death (>85% reduction) and hospitalization. Paxlovid has done better in clinical trials to prevent hospitalization but it has many drug-drug interactions so many elderly people cannot use it. Molnupiravir has the theoretical risk of mutagenesis in pregnant women but for the elderly who are past reproductive age, it is a very safe and effective drug to use. I encourage the CECC to contact their counterparts in Japan, Singapore, Israel and the UK to get their experience in using these two oral anti-virals in the recent COVID-Omicron surge. [Full Disclosure: Dr. Dean Li, President of Merck Research Laboratories, is my brother-in-law so I am not pushing the Merck pill for obvious conflict of interest reasons.] Based on the above, my suggestions on messaging are: 1. Tell the country that COVID-Omicron is an entirely different disease than the previous COVID variants so the whole country IS NOT IMMUNE to getting the infection. However, through the sacrifice and cooperation of everyone in Taiwan, the country succeeded in preventing disease and death during the previous waves of infection that caused a lot of problems around the world. This is shared success that the CECC and everyone in Taiwan should take credit, be proud of, and very relieved by. 2. Despite the fact that no one is protected from infection, but because COVID-Omicron is mild, public health policy needs to be adjusted to focus on treating the vulnerable rather than preventing infection of all. 3. Acknowledge that some segments of society have been severely affected by COVID policies so the recovery of these sectors is taken in consideration in updating the public health policy. 4. Acknowledge that some COVID policies were confusing to the public in the past so the new policies will be more consistent and logical. For example, the policy of requiring masking outdoors while people eating at restaurants indoors are not required to mask makes no sense. My suggestions for the new policy are geared towards lowering hospitalization and death rates while avoiding unnecessary disruptions in people's lives: 1. Push vaccination for vulnerable groups (the elderly and those with pre-existing conditions that make them more prone to severe disease). Send vaccination nurses to the nursing homes and neighborhoods with elderly people to get everyone fully vaccinated (including booster shots). Getting the 30% of those 65-75 and 44% of elderly >75 who have not been fully vaccinated and boosted should be a high priority 2. Use the "test positive and treat" strategy for those in vulnerable groups. As I mentioned before, Paxlovid for all but Molnupiravir for those who cannot take Paxlovid. Treat them before their symptoms get worse because it is cheaper to give them the medicine than risk their need for hospitalization. 3. No more putting those with mild disease in special facilities or hospitals so that there are plenty of capacity for those who need hospitalization. 4. Recommend (not mandate with threat of punishment) those who have close contact with COVID-Omicron patients to mask around others for 5 days (no need to do so with household members because they are already given it to them) if they are asymptomatic. 5. No testing of asymptomatic people unless their job requires it (nursing home, hospital, etc.). 6. No more closing schools, factories, or offices because of positive COVID-Omicron cases. 7. No more mandatory masking except for those described in #4 above. People here are so used to masking that many will still do so with the threat of punishment. 8. No more mandatory quarantine, even for those who test positive. Highly recommend those who test positive to wear a mask when around people and not eat with others but not make it a punishable offense. [Treat them like people who have a bad flu, not like criminals.] 9. No more testing or quarantine requirements for visitors from abroad. As the local infection rate is now higher than that many other countries, there is no reason to require new arrivals to do anything different when they are asymptomatic. It's confusing to many that I can go anywhere in the world without quarantine but have to do quarantine plus multiple tests when arriving in Taiwan (and a handful of Asian countries). The benefit of the policies listed above is that the resources of the country are directed toward saving lives rather than collecting lots of infection data. It will reclaim the international travel hub status of Taoyuan International Airport (and not let Singapore and Seoul dominate the air travel sector) and revive the tourism, convention, airline, hotel businesses. It will simplify everyone's life and reduce anxiety. It may be counter intuitive but if you look at the data from the US university campuses and European countries, it is better to get as many young people infected as quickly as possible to shorten the surge while building up herd immunity for COVID-Omicron without a lot of severe cases. The old policy for flattening the curve is to prevent overwhelming the hospitals but with oral antivirals and milder disease, there is no need to flatten the curve. It is better to get the whole surge completed in 2 months like in most countries that pursue a more open policy. I am convinced that when the messaging is clear and based on current understanding of the situation, the people will embrace it and praise the CECC's leadership. Best, Pui -- Pui-Yan Kwok, MD, PhD Director, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Academia Sinica
    11 人回報1 則回應4 年前