Cofacts 真的假的 - 轉傳訊息查證

WHEN I GRADUATED I BEGAN WORKING AT MERCK MERCK HAS RELEASED PEPCID FAMOTIDINE PRILOSEC OMEPRAZOLE AND MERCK MANUFACTURES QUITE A FEW VACCINES MOST WELL KNOWN IS PROBABLY THE MMR BEFORE MY WIFE BECAME PREGNANT WITH OUR FIRST CHILD I WAS LARGELY INDIFFERENT TOWARDS VACCINES I JUST ASSUMED THAT IT WAS OKAY I DIDN'T REALLY THINK ABOUT IT SO WHEN STEPHANIE BECAME PREGNANT EARLY 2000 I HAD JUST RECENTLY STARTED IN THE VACCINE STERILE QUALITY OPERATIONS BUSINESS UNIT AS A SUPERVISOR IN THE BIOCHEMISTRY LABORATORY I BEGAN TO ATTEND VACCINE POLICY MEETINGS I ASKED BASIC QUESTIONS ABOUT FOR INSTANCE THE HEP B VACCINE I'VE GOT A CHILD COMING IN A COUPLE OF MONTHS SO I'M WONDERING ABOUT THE WISDOM SCIENTIFIC AND OTHERWISE ABOUT ADMINISTERING A HEP B VACCINE TO AN INFANT VIRTUALLY EVERY MEDICAL SCHOLAR ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE IMMUNE NOT IMMUNE SYSTEM OF AN INFANT IS NOWHERE NEAR DEVELOPED AND SO THIS IS A MEDICAL INTERVENTION TO BOOST AN IMMUNE SYSTEM ABOUT WHICH WE KNOW VERY LITTLE MY QUESTIONS ARE VERY SPECIFIC HOW DO WE KNOW VACCINES ARE SAFE WHAT DO WE DO TO DETERMINE THEIR SAFETY WHAT HAVE WE DONE TO DETERMINE THE ROBUSTNESS OF THE METHODS THAT WE'RE EMPLOYING TO DETERMINE SAFETY AND EFFICACY THESE ARE BASIC QUESTIONS WHAT I BEGAN TO FIND IS THAT THE TYPE OF STUDIES WERE KIND OF SHABBY I FELT THEY WERE KIND OF RUSHED THEY'RE SORT OF A RUSH TO MARKET I RAISED QUESTIONS LIKE THAT AND DIDN'T FEEL THAT THEY WERE PARTICULARLY APPRECIATED WHAT I'M SUGGESTING IS THAT WHILE I WAS AT MERCK THE ANSWERS THAT COME BACK ARE SUPERFICIAL AND THAT'S USUALLY CODE FOR I DON'T KNOW THAT DOESN'T LINE UP THEN WITH THE CONVICTION AND THE PASSION THE VACCINES ARE ABSOLUTELY BULLETPROOF AND EVERYBODY SHOULD BE VACCINATED THERE'S A DISCONNECT THERE MAKES YOU WONDER WHAT ELSE IS GOING ON RIGHT AROUND WHEN MY WIFE WAS ABOUT SEVEN MONTHS PREGNANT IT WAS ONE OF THOSE MOMENTS WHERE WE'RE DRIVING DOWN THE ROAD AND I'M SHARING WITH HER THE CONCERNS THAT I THAT I BEGAN TO HAVE AND EVENTUALLY WE JUST KIND OF LOOKED AT EACH OTHER AND KNEW THAT WE HAD COME TO THE SAME CONCLUSION THE PROBABILITY OF DISEASE ACTUALLY FROM VACCINATION WAS ACTUALLY HIGHER AND WE MADE A DECISION WE WEREN'T GONNA VACCINATE ANY OF OUR CHILDREN WE WERE MEETING MORE AND MORE INDIVIDUALS IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL BUSINESS WE'RE ALSO LEANING IN THE SAME DIRECTION I HAD A DEAR FRIEND WHO STILL WORKS IN BIG PHARMA SHE WAS ABOUT TO GIVE BIRTH HERSELF SHE MADE THAT DECISION AS WELL NOT VACCINATE AT ALL AND WE HAVE NOT VACCINATED A SINGLE TIME FOR ANY OF OUR FOUR CHILDREN THEY ARE SUPER HEALTHY AND IT'S YOU KNOW 18 YEARS AFTER THE FACT AND NEVER LOOKED BACK

1 人回報・8 個月前

We have 1400 studies, peer-reviewed studies published on NIH's website, PubMed, linking it to all of linking various vaccines to all of those injuries. doing this for money? Well, they're making $60 billion a year selling us vaccines, but they're making $500 billion a year sell the remedies for the injuries caused by vaccines. The diabetes medication, the Adderall, the Ritalin, the Concerta, the Advair inhalers, the albuterol inhalers, the antiseizure medications, all of those. This is a really great business plan for these companies. You make people sick, and then you sell them the lifetime cure. Measles, they weren't making any money. If you get measles or chickenpox, the cure is chicken soup and vitamin A. And you can't patent either of those — and you're well in a week. They're self-limiting illnesses that go away in a week. But if you can give somebody that vaccine and make them diabetic for life, then you've got a permanent customer. Or ADD or ADHD. And many of the vaccines are for illnesses for which there's zero risk. A baby, a one-day old baby has zero risk of getting hepatitis B if his mother doesn't have it, which every mother is tested for. You can only get it from unprotected sex or from sharing needles. Why are we giving one-day-old babies a vaccine for hepatitis B? And they admit the vaccine only lasts five years. That baby is not going to have sex with a prostitute in the first five years of life. There's zero risk. And yet it's a very, very dangerous vaccine.

1 人回報・8 個月前

1 人回報・8 個月前

兒童疫苗能不打都不要打！疫苗打越多，疾病就越多。（兒童疫苗造成自閉症、過動症、學習障礙、腦殘、各種免疫系統疾病及癌症）美國默克大藥厰研究員自述：當我畢業後，我開始在默克藥廠工作。當時公司剛推出 Pepsifemotidine、Prilosec、Omeprazole。默克生產許多疫苗，其中最著名的可能是 MMR（麻疹、腮腺炎、德國麻疹三合一疫苗）。在我妻子懷上我們第一個孩子之前，我對疫苗基本上是無感的。我只是理所當然地認為它們是安全的，從未多想。因此，當史蒂芬妮在 2000 年初懷孕時，我剛好開始在疫苗無菌品質營運部門工作，擔任生化實驗室的主管，並開始參加一些疫苗政策會議。我提出了一些基本問題，例如關於 B 型肝炎疫苗的。我想著自己即將有孩子，便對於給新生兒施打 B 型肝炎疫苗的科學及其他考量感到好奇。幾乎所有醫學學者都承認，嬰兒的免疫與自體免疫系統都尚未發育完全，而疫苗是一種針對免疫系統的醫療介入，而我們對該系統仍知之甚少。我的問題非常具體：我們如何知道疫苗是安全的？我們採取什麼方式來確認它的安全性？我們又如何確保用來判定安全性的那些方法本身是可靠的？這些都是最基本的問題。我開始發現，許多研究似乎做得很草率，感覺像是倉促上市。我提出這樣的問題時，感覺並不受到歡迎。我的意思是，當我在公司內提出疑問時，得到的回答往往很表面化。那通常是「我不知道」的代碼。這種態度與外界宣稱「疫苗絕對安全、每個人都應該接種」的堅定信念並不一致，這樣的落差讓人懷疑事情是否另有隱情。大約在我妻子懷孕七個月時，我們有一次開車外出，我向她分享我開始有的疑慮。最後我們互相看了一眼，都明白對方的想法一致：我們認為接種疫苗所造成疾病的可能性反而更高。於是我們做出決定——不讓任何孩子接種疫苗。隨著時間推移，我們認識了越來越多在製藥業工作的人，他們也傾向同樣的方向。我有一位親密的朋友至今仍在大型藥廠任職，她懷孕時也做出了同樣的選擇——完全不接種疫苗。而我們的四個孩子至今一次都沒有接種，他們都非常健康。十八年過去了，我們從未後悔過。

3 人回報・8 個月前