真的假的

https://youtube.com/shorts/UiYXcFXJcfg?si=HvZ_2Hoxj4NvQSk7

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/RQ8qnN58xo4?si=pb00d7KEdL7UmQPP

https://youtu.be/Enx4RK2cql0?si=q5210c66QUTf_ydE

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/fasuhutkSgg?si=2BX4eb_B6SO8dRuu

你那微弱的小小的一票 另一種凝視／專欄 04:102025/07/30 中國時報 楊渡 請記住這一刻，當你投下「不同意」，那微弱的小小的一票，共同拉住了民主台灣，那站在法西斯的懸崖邊上「小小的多山的島嶼」。 請設想，這一次「大罷免大成功」，民進黨罷掉10席以上立委，那會是什麼結果？首先，中央政府一定認為這次所有的操作，尤其國家機器與民團之間的合作關係是一個可持續的、可操作的模式，以後會繼續玩下去。 那就會變成希特勒當年操作衝鋒隊和右翼團體那樣，鼓動他們用「民團」的名義，以國家機器為後盾，到處橫行，壓制民間異議者。希特勒還可以叫企業幫民團買服裝、買武器，出資訓練，衝到街上去毆打集會遊行的群眾，直到沒有人敢出來反對。 不要覺得不可能。想想看，當藍營立委站在街頭宣講，就有民團在後面高喊「滾回中國去」、「賣國賊」。在街頭這樣正面羞辱人，很顯然他是仗恃著國家機器為後盾。現在這些民團到處舉著麥克風罵「中共同路人」，逼迫路人表態反共，逼著老百姓站在街頭聽廣播，只要別人稍微反抗就暴力相向，攝影存證，PO上網叫側翼全面炎上。那是一個什麼樣的社會氛圍？整個社會的仇恨氣氛會發展到什麼程度？ 想想看，如果你是一個尋常老百姓，面對這樣的氛圍，會不會選擇轉頭離開，乾脆噤聲沉默。因為你知道，他背後的靠山是警察、檢調、國家機器，於是，所有老百姓形成沉默螺旋，社會全面噤聲。那時候民主已死，再也沒有誰可以保護你了。 這一次大罷免就非常明顯，老百姓不再相信法治。警察不可信，檢調單位也不可信。如果你在街上跟民團發生衝突，請問警察會逮捕誰？就算你跟民團提起訴訟，到頭來檢察官和法院會給你公平的審判嗎？如果你明知司法不公，誰還敢跟他對抗？整個社會當然變成更大的白色恐怖。 更可怕的是這個政府。當他發現可以用一個「中央廚房」作為意識形態的宣傳中心，指揮底下所有人動員起來。動員系統不僅有行政部門、府院黨，還有外圍民團側翼，更有許多搖旗吶喊的文人，跟中央廚房配合無間。也難怪一句「我們小小的多山的國家」一夕之間廣傳整個網路。 整個島嶼聽命於民進黨中央的「戈培爾」一條鞭指揮。媒體早已買好了，側翼發包了，民團都有拿到工程款了，一個意識形態國家機器轟轟然開動起來。 黨政軍、檢警司法、意識形態國家機器，再加民團幫忙壓制異議者，那時，我們距離專制獨裁還有多遠？難道你不覺得大罷免如果有十幾個立委被罷，所有專制現象會升高，街頭戰場拉到其他縣市，續戰823罷免？整個街頭一定更火爆，仇恨不斷上升，直到完全壓制所有異議之聲！ 當年希特勒的崛起絕對不是靠著所謂「平庸之惡」。那是身為總理的希特勒製造國會縱火案，宣稱這是共產黨發動革命的信號，大力宣傳德國正處於共產黨革命的關鍵時刻，只有通過《授權法》才能制止。最後逼得國會重新改選，將德國共產黨列為非法，暴力逼迫社會民主黨棄權，最後取得《授權法》。 《授權法》規定總理可以不通過議會自行制訂規章以代替法律。希特勒獨裁時代自此開始。這一段，有沒有似曾相識之感？ 這就是為什麼罷免破功是如此重要的原因。台灣已經站在法西斯的懸崖邊上，那是民主命懸一線的決定性瞬間。所以我要向投下「不同意」的人致上深深敬意。因為你那微弱的小小的一票，民主沒有跌落懸崖。 是的，民主是需要捍衛的。獨裁法西斯的幽靈，還在台灣的上空徘徊，隨時會復活歸來。（作者為作家）

1 2 飛到這裡 這裡 這裡 另一個飛到那裡 天啊 超準確 準備好了， 看這個 我們在深圳中國 我們在公園中央 我們要喝點飲料 被一架飛機摔斷 我從來沒有試過這樣的事 但實際上 飛機正在摔斷 我們點了一杯星巴克 我們來看看 它正在把星巴克帶進來 哇 那是星巴克 正在運送貨品 所以運送已經落地了 正在那裡 我們來看看它把我的星巴克帶到哪 在公園中 只需要輸入我的電話號碼 我應該可以拿到 我們來看看 我們來看看 號碼成功了 我們來看看 哇 我們來看看 特別送貨箱 很酷 裡面有星巴克 哇 我們來看看 我第一次吃星巴克 無人機送外賣 我們聽說很久很久了 一直沒有見到食物 今天我們就看到 它就在我們面前 美團無人機 把我們的外賣放在這裡 進行打包 然後把箱子放到我們的機器上 就可以起飛了 它就這樣送到了天上 實在是太賽博了 原來感覺就很不切實際 很科幻 美團牛逼 大家牛逼 點了個外賣 說是無人機給我配送 還給我發了短信通知 出去一看 有的在上升 有的在降落 還挺忙碌的 終於來了 帶著我的續命空投 跟我一樣 都是第一次 見無人機送外賣的 圍觀群眾 看到它投地了 放下東西 它就自己飛走了 輸入密碼 就可以取外賣了 輸入密碼 就可以取外賣了 那我放哪裡 沒注意 原來放在這裡 打開魔術體 打開空投箱 取出我的續命物資 但是 空投箱怎麼辦 拉起來 立馬變平了 放進去 第一次取空投 手法略顯生疏 相信在不久將來 天上無人...

https://youtu.be/F9gMRJXn5Ak?si=KLWGA92ohnbWPvYp

https://atoecs.com/item/he0031/hzk31.html?campaign_id=23853043927510397&adset_id=23853043927480397&ad_id=23853043927530397&utm_source=facebook&act=1188404742017516&fbclid=IwAR3FWT3WucFnRL8v7A6Q4oVNAqOTe0lvVsB1QTEbRnBWUMdNQ8poCsSof5E_aem_AWr-GZBt33_htgfAAydmQovHjpQ7Pp3B6GFww46qmHVZ_ZDLMHMMO5JTalx9sp5luXMXHh8_gsr_NYiNtWE--UJejguv8of1L-VXiLZJQSvonXH5mlMnRJchvSY_t_x7PRQ#

別人家的孩子死不完! 這些力挺普丁的俄羅斯官員 沒一個把子女送上前線 | 新頭殼 | LINE TODAY https://liff.line.me/1454987169-1WAXAP3K/v2/article/7N06EX8?utm_source=lineshare

Professor, you said a lot of wonderful things about China, and surely they're doing a lot of things right. But how do you reconcile the fact that to make it work for China, it seems to be based on a high level of repression? Environmental destruction, censorship, a certain ideological stubbornness. I mean, we've spoken about Hong Kong, the Uighurs. How do you reconcile that, and do you think that's tolerable? Thank you. I'm really glad you asked that question, because your question captured very well the Anglo-Saxon media's perception of China. And I would suggest to you, very bluntly, that it's a distorted perspective of reality. Let's take the first word you use, repression. If the Communist Party of China only relied on repression to stay in power, it would not create the most dynamic economy in the world, right? It is by far the most dynamic economy in the world. It has delivered the fastest growing economy for 30 years. And it has done this by educating the Chinese people to a level and extent that the Chinese people have never been educated ever before. And you say it's repression? You obviously are taking the old Cold War mindset. I was in Moscow in 1976, and I saw repression in Moscow. And when I was in Moscow, the Soviet citizens were not allowed to travel outside the Soviet Union. That's repression. In the year 2019, 139 million Chinese left China freely. Guess what? Zero defectors. 139 million Chinese, right? That's twice the population of the UK, went back to China. So all your description, when you say environmental degradation, China's climate change policies are far more responsible than those of the United States, which has not once, but twice withdrawn from global environmental protocols. Kyoto Protocol, the Bush administration left eight years. Paris Accords, Trump administration left four years. And you know what? The reason why we're having climate change today is not because of new flows of greenhouse gas emissions from China and India. It's because of what the Western countries have put in the atmosphere since the Western Industrial Revolution. Get the data. The single largest contributor, cumulatively, right? It's number one, United States, number two, Europe, number three, China, right? And the West wants China to pay an economic price for the current flows, but the West doesn't want to pay an economic price for what it put in the atmosphere. You want to deprive the Indians of electricity when the United States could just, by the way, if the United States could impose a dollar a gallon tax, that would save the world. Cut down gasoline consumption, raise money for investment in green technology, simple solutions. And by contrast, the largest reforestation program in the world is carried out by China. It has already reforested an area the size of Belgium or bigger, right? So all your descriptions capture the natural distortions of China that you get in the Anglo-Saxon media, which violate the rules of the Enlightenment, which say that you must be rational, calm and objective, especially in understanding your adversary. And if the Chinese were as stupid and as incompetent as you describe them to be, don't worry about them. But I can assure you, you are now dealing with a far more intelligent and rational actor that doesn't fit any of the Anglo-Saxon categories that you applied to them. Please forgive my bluntness.

https://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20220905000011-260410