本則回應

• Pei-Chi Lo標記此篇為：⭕ 含有正確訊息

  理由

  ■此研究是指Peter Forster等人刊於PNAS期刊的論文，轉傳訊息大抵符合研究內容。
  
  ■提醒：解讀應謹慎，雖研究的確認為「最接近蝙蝠冠狀病毒基因序為A型」、「A型與C型多為歐美確診者」、「B型多為武漢、中國與鄰近亞洲國家確診者」，但這【不代表】病毒來源為歐美。
  
  ①研究中有提及
  
  閱讀更多

  出處

  2020年4月8日刊於PNAS期刊的研究原文：
  https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/04/07/2004999117
  
  劍橋大學官網針對此研究的新聞稿介紹：
  https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/covi⋯is-provides-snapshot-of-pandemic-origins

  Phylogenetic network analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes

  https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020/04/07/2004999117

  Contributed by Colin Renfrew, March 30, 2020 (sent for review March 17, 2020; reviewed by Toomas Kivisild and Carol Stocking) SignificanceTh

  COVID-19: genetic network analysis provides ‘snapshot’ of pandemic origins

  https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/covid-19-genetic-network-analysis-provides-snapshot-of-pandemic-origins

  Researchers from Cambridge, UK, and Germany have reconstructed the early “evolutionary paths” of COVID-19 in humans – as infection spread from Wuhan out to Europe and North America – using genetic net