訊息原文

1 人回報1 則回應6 年前
An image claiming that Vladimir Putin said that United States created coronavirus as a biological weapon.

現有回應

增加新回應

  • 撰寫回應
  • 使用相關回應 13
  • 搜尋

你可能也會對這些類似文章有興趣

  • An Israeli analyst suggested that the coronavirus might be a biological weapon created in a laboratory.
    1 人回報1 則回應6 年前
  • The new coronavirus COVID-19 is a US biological weapon against China and Italy ; Milorad Dodik, the Serb member of the BiH presidency, is infected with COVID-19.
    1 人回報1 則回應6 年前
  • There have been no cases of infection in Beijing. The epidemic did not create problems for the Chinese economy. This proves that the new coronavirus is a biological weapon of the Chinese to destroy the world.
    1 人回報1 則回應6 年前
  • We're the ones provoking this war, just like we provoked the war in Ukraine. We are now provoking a war with China and who benefits? I'll tell you right now, your enemy is not China. Your enemy is not Russia. Your enemy is the military industrial complex, which has been fleecing this country to the tunes of hundreds of billions and trillions of dollars. How many times are we going to have a defense secretary say, hey, we can't account for $2 trillion in the Pentagon again, which has happened twice now in my life. So again, people are being the war machine cannot be stopped. Who's running this country? The war machine. It certainly isn't Joe Biden making these decisions. I would like to know who is making the decisions. And I just want to remind everybody, the United States is the world's terrorists. We just set the Middle East on fire in the last 20 years. And now we're doing a proxy war in Ukraine, which we provoked, NATO provoked, and it was just admitted that we provoked it by the former prime minister of Germany. And now we're trying to save a writer with with China and they're predicting a war. Again, China's not going to invade us. China's not our enemy. We might have an economic war. That's what these are. These are economic wars. These are wars for in Ukraine. It's about liquefied natural gas and making sure Germany and Russia never come together because we fear Russia's natural resources and manpower. And we fear them getting together with Germany with their technology and their capital. And so that's why we blew up the Nord Stream pipeline. That's why we're doing the Ukraine war. This is all about hegemony, imperialism and economics. And if there's a marine somewhere, it's there because they're about to steal some natural resources from another country. As everybody's screaming about what a bad guy Putin is for invading Ukraine, the United States is currently occupying a third of Syria. And which third is that? It's the third that has the oil. And how do I know we're there to steal their oil? Because the president of the United States said so.
    1 人回報1 則回應3 年前
  • 網傳「美國軍人享有台灣健保」的圖片及訊息,內容聲稱美國要求 1650 萬退伍軍人可以使用台灣健保,而民進黨表示十分贊成且支持。經查證,立委王定宇 10 月 13 日質詢退輔會副主委李文忠,提到美國眾議院退伍軍人事務委員會主席馬克高野Mark Takano,建議美國在亞太地區的退伍軍人,可以付費使用台灣的醫療資源,並非要讓 1650 萬名退伍軍人使用健保;李文忠當時表示,在雙方平等互惠的原則下表達歡迎,但駐美代表曾向美方詢問,並沒有收到後續回覆。 The pictures and messages of "American soldiers enjoy Taiwan's health insurance" were circulated on the Internet, claiming that the United States requires 16.5 million veterans to use Taiwan's health insurance, and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) expressed its approval and support. After verification, legislator Wang Dingyu questioned Li Wenzhong, vice chairman of the Retirement Association on October 13, referring to Mark Takano, chairman of the Veterans Affairs Committee of the US House of Representatives, who suggested that US veterans in the Asia-Pacific region can pay for medical services in Taiwan. The resource is not to allow 16.5 million veterans to use health insurance; Li Wenzhong said at the time that he would welcome it under the principle of equality and reciprocity between the two parties, but the representative in the United States had asked the US side and did not receive a follow-up reply. MyGoPen查證: https://www.mygopen.com/2022/11/veteran.html?m=1
    2 人回報1 則回應4 年前
  • Exactly, exactly. And the story behind the Intelligence League is a very simple one. After COVID ended up spreading around the United States and producing a gigantic domestic disaster, obviously, our intelligence services wanted to prove that they were not responsible for what happened, that they had provided the information to the top American leadership, which was just ignored. In other words, they wanted to get away from being blamed for the disaster. Therefore, four separate intelligence sources confirmed to ABC News that the secret report had been provided to the White House and our top leadership in November describing a potentially cataclysmic disease outbreak taking place in the city of Wuhan, China. The problem with it, the problem they ran into is then when somebody checked the timeline, they realized in November, there was no cataclysmic disease outbreak in Wuhan. At that point, according to all the available knowledge and retrospective evidence, probably a dozen or maybe 20 people were starting to feel a little bit sick in a city of 11 million. There was no way for any outside observer to possibly be aware of the disease outbreak at that point. In fact, the Chinese government itself only became aware of the outbreak at the end of December, six or seven weeks later. So naturally, the Pentagon immediately denied the existence of that report, said, you know, we don't care, four intelligence sources said that they produced the report, it never existed. However, a week later, Israeli television confirmed the existence of a report saying that report had been sent to Israel, it had been sent to all of our NATO allies in November, and it had been produced in the second week of November. Again, the second week of November was long before anybody in the world could have possibly been aware of the disease outbreak in Wuhan, except for the people responsible. It's fairly close to a smoking gun. It looks that way to me too. It's interesting, was it Esper they asked about this and he said, he said, I don't recall. Exactly. I mean, at that point, you know, again, it was an embarrassment that the report had been provided to these people and ignored until people realized that the dates proved that it was for knowledge of the outbreak in Wuhan. So in other words, it's one thing to have an embarrassment of the fact that the government ignored a report like that. It's another thing when the report proves who was responsible for the disease outbreak. And I mean, America, over the decades, America has spent $100 billion developing its bio warfare technology. America brought the Trump administration brought in Robert Cadillac, America's leading bio warfare expert in 2017. And in 2018, there was suddenly a mysterious viral epidemic that devastated China's poultry industry. In 2019, China's pig herds were annihilated. And then in late 2019, suddenly, the COVID epidemic brought up, which really raises all sorts of incredibly dark suspicions of what really happened. Do you think Trump's telling the truth that he wasn't in the loop? I definitely I don't doubt that the report might have been sent to Trump's desk. But I get the sense that Trump doesn't actually read a lot. And you have all these stories of, for example, Trump's senior officials hiding his own executive orders. He forgets about them. He would forget about them. And we were talking about administration that really was operating in a very strange way with the top figures in the administration running circles around the president ignoring the president. And I fully believe that Trump had absolutely no idea when COVID leaked back to the United States that it was an American bio warfare, bio warfare weapon that was coming to us. And that's the reason they ignored it. That's the reason his response was so lackadaisical. The perpetrators who actually were in the loop have somehow raised the alarm in such a way that the US could protect itself. Well, they did to some extent. I mean, for example, Robert Cadillac, again, our top bio warfare expert, from January to August 2019, Cadillac and his department ran something called the Crimson Contagion Exercise, in which federal and state officials in the United States planned out how they would ensure that if a mysterious virus, viral epidemic, mysterious respiratory virus suddenly appeared in China, that they would prevent it from devastating America and leaking back into China. Eight months they did it, and the virus of exactly that type suddenly appeared in China a couple of months after the end of that exercise. Now, as it turned out, the training obviously was insufficient. That's the understatement. It shows that the people involved in launching the attack against China.
    2 人回報1 則回應3 年前
  • 📣 📣 📣 請大家注意! 拿信時一定要帶手套🧤收到郵件一定要消毒!!! 看完信後要洗手!!!美國🇺🇸 郵政員工已有20名死于冠狀病毒,1000名員工檢測呈陽性,6000員工接觸病毒後處於自我隔離狀態。 📣 📣 📣 Please pay attention! Must be disinfected when receiving the USPS parcel or mail !!! United States 🇺🇸 20 postal employees have died of coronavirus, 1000 employees tested positive, and 6000 employees were in a state of self-quarantine after exposure to the virus.
    10 人回報2 則回應6 年前
  • Professor, you said a lot of wonderful things about China, and surely they're doing a lot of things right. But how do you reconcile the fact that to make it work for China, it seems to be based on a high level of repression? Environmental destruction, censorship, a certain ideological stubbornness. I mean, we've spoken about Hong Kong, the Uighurs. How do you reconcile that, and do you think that's tolerable? Thank you. I'm really glad you asked that question, because your question captured very well the Anglo-Saxon media's perception of China. And I would suggest to you, very bluntly, that it's a distorted perspective of reality. Let's take the first word you use, repression. If the Communist Party of China only relied on repression to stay in power, it would not create the most dynamic economy in the world, right? It is by far the most dynamic economy in the world. It has delivered the fastest growing economy for 30 years. And it has done this by educating the Chinese people to a level and extent that the Chinese people have never been educated ever before. And you say it's repression? You obviously are taking the old Cold War mindset. I was in Moscow in 1976, and I saw repression in Moscow. And when I was in Moscow, the Soviet citizens were not allowed to travel outside the Soviet Union. That's repression. In the year 2019, 139 million Chinese left China freely. Guess what? Zero defectors. 139 million Chinese, right? That's twice the population of the UK, went back to China. So all your description, when you say environmental degradation, China's climate change policies are far more responsible than those of the United States, which has not once, but twice withdrawn from global environmental protocols. Kyoto Protocol, the Bush administration left eight years. Paris Accords, Trump administration left four years. And you know what? The reason why we're having climate change today is not because of new flows of greenhouse gas emissions from China and India. It's because of what the Western countries have put in the atmosphere since the Western Industrial Revolution. Get the data. The single largest contributor, cumulatively, right? It's number one, United States, number two, Europe, number three, China, right? And the West wants China to pay an economic price for the current flows, but the West doesn't want to pay an economic price for what it put in the atmosphere. You want to deprive the Indians of electricity when the United States could just, by the way, if the United States could impose a dollar a gallon tax, that would save the world. Cut down gasoline consumption, raise money for investment in green technology, simple solutions. And by contrast, the largest reforestation program in the world is carried out by China. It has already reforested an area the size of Belgium or bigger, right? So all your descriptions capture the natural distortions of China that you get in the Anglo-Saxon media, which violate the rules of the Enlightenment, which say that you must be rational, calm and objective, especially in understanding your adversary. And if the Chinese were as stupid and as incompetent as you describe them to be, don't worry about them. But I can assure you, you are now dealing with a far more intelligent and rational actor that doesn't fit any of the Anglo-Saxon categories that you applied to them. Please forgive my bluntness.
    3 人回報1 則回應4 年前
  • 特好消息! 新冠疫情再見了!(永遠不再見了)  美國即將有「治療新冠病毒的口服液」。 患有新冠狀病毒者在家口服該藥5天,體內徹底清除了新冠狀病毒,患者徹底康復。  該葯譯名為「莫那皮納偉」(Monapinavir),由德國「瑞吉貝爾」(Rigibel) 和美國「默克」(Merck) 兩大藥廠聯合研製,已經在人體成功完成第一期和第二期臨床試驗,效果100%; 目前第三期臨床試驗接近收尾,效果非常好。 如果順利的話,在4~5個月內就可以面市。 該藥患者在家裡可以自己口服,5天痊癒,使用非常方便。 以後治新冠病毒就像現在治療普通感冒一樣。 新冠狀病毒就不可怕了。  該藥起初是針對流感病毒研製的。 它是化合物,原理是阻止病毒ia酶,也就是阻止病毒本身複製,從而根本上很快消滅病毒。 現在抗新冠病毒疫苗的原理是針對新冠病毒的凸緣,從而阻止新冠狀病毒和人體細胞結合。 這兩者的原理是不同的。   去年3~4月荷蘭和挪威養貂場發生貂患新冠狀病毒,導致貂百萬計的大規模死亡。 養貂場用"莫那皮納偉"喂貂,結果發現24小時後患病的貂內沒有新冠狀病毒了,養貂場很快終止了新冠狀病毒的傳播。 然後二大藥廠就在人體上進行第一期臨床試驗,成功後進行第二期,第三期臨床試驗,迄今為止即將正式上市了。  總之,這是科學界,特別是醫藥界的偉大成就。 也許它會繼安定,阿司匹林和青黴素,阿平為四大經典藥物。   Great News!!! Covid-19 Bye Bye  The United States will soon have an"oral solution for the treatment of the new coronavirus( Covid-19)."  People suffering from the new coronavirus took the drug at home for 5days, the new coronavirus was completely cleared from the body and the patientfully recovered.  The drug is translated as"Monapinavir" and is jointly developed by the two majorpharmaceutical companies "Rigibel" in Germanyand "Merck" in the United States. It has successfully completed thefirst and second phase clinical trials in humans with 100% effect; Currently, the third phase of clinicaltrials is nearing the end and the effect is very good.  If it goes well, it will be available in themarket within 4 to 5 months.  The patientcan take this medicine by himself at home and heal in 5 days, which is veryconvenient to use.  Treating the newcoronavirus in the future is like treating the common cold now.  The coronavirus is not terrible anymore. The drug was originallydeveloped against influenza viruses.  Itis a compound, the principle is to prevent the virus via the enzyme, that is, toprevent the virus itself from replicating, so as to eliminate the virusquickly.  The principle of the currentanti-coronavirus vaccine is to target the flange of the new coronavirus,thereby preventing the combination of the new coronavirus and human cells.  The principles of the two are different.  From March to April last year,a new coronavirus occurred in mink farms in the Netherlandsand Norway,resulting in the massive deaths of millions of minks.  The mink farm fed the mink with"Monapinavir" and found that there was no new coronavirus in the sickmink 24 hours later. The mink farm quickly stopped the spread of the newcoronavirus.  Then the two major pharmaceuticalcompanies will carry out the first phase of clinical trials on humans. Aftersuccess, they will conduct the second and third phases of clinical trials. Sofar, they will be officially launched.  In short, this is a greatachievement for the scientific community, especially the medicalcommunity. Maybe it will follow Valium,aspirin, and penicillin as the four classic drugs.
    38 人回報3 則回應5 年前
  • ❗️請主意❗️ *美國衛生部負責人J. Anthony表示,美國有50%的死亡發生在理髮窒中。 *最大的危險來自理髮店本身*。 理髮師用同一條毛巾擦至少4至5人的鼻子 *理髮毛巾,理髮剃刀,理髮刷,椅子等被很多人使用。 *理髮師將與許多人接觸,*如果我們與受感染的病人接觸,票肯定會被傳染。* *在病毒還完全消失之前,我們甚至都不會想到去沙龍理髮。 *即使情況恢復正常,威脅仍然存在。 這種危險將持續很長時間。 Translation: * Please take note* * The head of the US Department of Health, J. Anthony, said that 50% of deaths in the United States occur in haircuts. * The greatest danger comes from the barber shop itself *. * Barber wipes the nose of at least 4 to 5 people with the same towel * * Barber towels, barber razors, barber brushes, chairs, etc. are used by many people. * The hairdresser will be in contact with many people. * If we are in contact with infected patients, the ticket will definitely be infected. * * We will not even think of going to the salon to get a haircut before the virus has completely disappeared. * Even if the situation returns to normal, the threat still exists. * This danger will last for a long time. *
    1 人回報1 則回應6 年前