轉貼請大家廣傳 : 《致聯合國國際人權辦公室的控訴文》--（全文中英對照）

Regarding: “Human Right of Taiwan Retired Civil Servants”
主題：「台灣廣義退休公務員的人權」

Dear Mr. xxx (.OHCHR ):

On the day of June xx, 2017, by an overwhelming majority, the congress of Taiwan passed “Organic Act of Public Service Pension”. This action caused a suffering to torture rest lifes of 460 thousands of Taiwan retired civil servants including career military/soldier, government employees, teachers, police and firefighters. Never happened in else countries in the world so far, Taiwan government distinctively violated principles of legality of “Non-retroactivity” based on “Legitimate expectation” as adopted by countries all over the world. A review group under Taiwan Presidential Office, illegally taking the place of Ministry of Civil Service, i.e. the competent authority, handled the whole process of so-called unconstitutional pension reform. The fact that Taiwan retired civil servants will start facing their dilemma of half-cut pension, indicates a deprivation of their foreseen property by Taiwan government.

在2017年6月xx日，台灣國會以壓倒性多數通過了「公務員退撫條例」，這種作為對為數46萬的台灣廣義退休公務員（軍公教警消）的餘生是ㄧ種劇痛與折磨；世界空前！台灣政府丌自違反世界各國公認的「不溯及既往」的法律原則，此種原則植基於「信賴保護原則」；總統府轄下的年金審議小組非法取代了主管機關的銓敘部，隻手遮天進行違憲的退休金改革，使這批台灣廣義退休公務員即將面臨退休金幾近砍半的困境，這種事實顯示台灣政府已剝奪了他們預見的財產。

Prior to 1995, all Taiwan retired civil servants were subject to the legal binding of the law “Full Payment of Responsibility”. It has been lasting for 22 years until 2017 that sufficiently intensifies “Legitimate expectation” to protect their pension in future. But right now Taiwan government behaving as an authoritarian leads a renewable pension reform due to going financial bankruptcy as excused. Almost cut to half as their will as if a bargaining in vegetable market. This event behind conceals a politics struggle that Taiwan government tries to rectify political foes by infringement and persecution of their property, a kind of human right. Actually the ratio of “Total national liabilities” to GDP is 40% in Taiwan much lower than 90％ in UK, 104％ in US and 243％ in Jansen. Such a case of unconstitutional pension reform never happened even when Greece encounters financial difficulties. Moreover, the new France president Macron emphasized “Pension reform is non-retroactive, since it represents a promise given by the government before.” and also “There will be no change to retired persons. Their pension and spending power won’t be hurt.” As to the United States, from 1920 to 1987, retired civil servants owned their pension payment based on the law of “Civil Service Retirement System” (CSRS). In 1987, The law was updated to “Federal Employees Retirement System” (FERS) that applied to new employees since then. Employees between 1984 and 1987 might select either CSRS or FERS according to their will.

在1995年以前，所有台灣廣義退休公務員都信從政府「全額給付責任」的法律約束，迄今已持續了22年，這足以強化「信賴保護原則」，以保障他們未來的退休給付；但在目前，台灣政府以未來的財政破產為藉口，專權引導退休金改革案的更新，退休金如同菜市場ㄧ般可以討價還價，隨意地幾近砍半，本案的背後隱藏著政治鬥爭，台灣政府藉侵犯他們財產，迫害他們人權來整肅異己；事實上，台灣的「國家負債總額」與「國內生產總值」之比為40% ，遠低於英國的90％、美國的104％及日本的243％。希臘既使在遭遇財政困難時，也沒有出此下策，違憲竄改退休金；更何況，法國新任總統馬克龍還強調「退休金改革不溯及既往，因為那代表以前政府給予的承諾」及「退休人員將無所改變，其退休金與消費能力絕不受損」；至於美國於1920 到1987年間，廣義退休公務員依「公務員退休系統」(CSRS)的法律，取得退休給付，1987年的新制法律「聯邦雇員退休系統」(FERS)則僅適用於當年以後的新進員工，1984-1987年的緩衝時段內，員工可以自由選擇舊制或新制。

The 22-year-lasting Taiwan pension system was regarded as a contract between Taiwan government and civil servants that was not allowed to contravene unless Taiwan government deals with “declared bankruptcy”. To deem the pension reform unconstitutional that retroactively stripped of their rights via the introduction of new laws, mass protesters of 250 thousands congregated in front of Presidential Office as shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. Special participants were wheelchair-bound veterans as shown in Fig. 3 who need medical care and nursing worker. They felt furious after being ignored their appealing. Furthermore facing trespasses of their foreseen property by Taiwan government, they feel helpless and pissed off. We hereby appeal to OHCHR for protecting the "Human Right of Taiwan Retired Civil Servants”.

新舊制切割的退休金體制已遂行了22年，可視為政府與公僕間的「契約」，不容違背，除非台灣政府處理「宣告破產」；由於認為退休金改革違憲而且溯及既往，新法剝奪彼等財產，為數高達25萬人的群眾聚集在總統府前示威，如圖1及圖2；需要醫療照顧及看護工的老兵們乘坐輪椅也参與盛況，如圖3；他們因為控訴被輕忽而感到憤怒，更因爲得面對可預見的財產被台灣政府侵犯而感到無助與腦火，我們在此特向「聯合國國際人權辦公室」提出控訴，藉以保護這群台灣廣義退休公務員的人權。

Best regards

Ping-Ho Chen

A Taiwan retired civil servant
ㄧ位台灣退休公僕

Taiwan listee in “2016 Who’s Who in the World, 33rd.”
2016 33屆世界名人錄台灣列名者

太好了，台灣年金改革已受到聯合國國際人權辦公室的關切和指控。

現有回應

Lin標記此篇為：❌ 含有不實訊息

理由

原文是信件，而非收到的答覆。此外總統蔡英文在兩公約國家報告國際審查會議審查委員表示，推動兩公約精神會是人權標準地板，而不是天花板；包括年金、司法改革，都有重要人權意義。
溯及既往沒有違憲，年改會委員也是政大法律系教授的郭明政，是德國慕尼黑大學法學博士，被牛津世界百科全書，譽為全球最

出處

https://news.tvbs.com.tw/politics/721578
年改溯及既往涉違憲？學者：可適用新法

https://udn.com/news/story/1/2242390?from=udn-referralnews_ch1artbottom
蔡英文：年金改革有重要人權意義

年改溯及既往涉違憲？　學者：可適用新法│TVBS新聞網

https://news.tvbs.com.tw/politics/721578

台北報導 2017/04/19 19:55

https://udn.com/news/story/1/2242390?from=udn-referralnews_ch1artbottom

udn.com 提供即時新聞以及豐富的政治、社會、地方、兩岸、國際、財經、數位、運動、NBA、娛樂、生活、健康、旅遊新聞，以最即時、多元的內容，滿足行動世代的需求。

真的假的

訊息原文

現有回應

理由

出處

年改溯及既往涉違憲？　學者：可適用新法│TVBS新聞網

增加新回應

你可能也會對這些類似文章有興趣

現有回應

理由

出處

年改溯及既往涉違憲？ 學者：可適用新法│TVBS新聞網

增加新回應

你可能也會對這些類似文章有興趣

年改溯及既往涉違憲？　學者：可適用新法│TVBS新聞網