主席,您說了許多關於中國的美妙⋯⋯

Professor, you said a lot of wonderful things about China, and surely they're doing a lot of things right. But how do you reconcile the fact that to make it work for China, it seems to be based on a high level of repression? Environmental destruction, censorship, a certain ideological stubbornness. I mean, we've spoken about Hong Kong, the Uighurs. How do you reconcile that, and do you think that's tolerable? Thank you. I'm really glad you asked that question, because your question captured very well the Anglo-Saxon media's perception of China. And I would suggest to you, very bluntly, that it's a distorted perspective of reality. Let's take the first word you use, repression. If the Communist Party of China only relied on repression to stay in power, it would not create the most dynamic economy in the world, right? It is by far the most dynamic economy in the world. It has delivered the fastest growing economy for 30 years. And it has done this by educating the Chinese people to a level and extent that the Chinese people have never been educated ever before. And you say it's repression? You obviously are taking the old Cold War mindset. I was in Moscow in 1976, and I saw repression in Moscow. And when I was in Moscow, the Soviet citizens were not allowed to travel outside the Soviet Union. That's repression. In the year 2019, 139 million Chinese left China freely. Guess what? Zero defectors. 139 million Chinese, right? That's twice the population of the UK, went back to China. So all your description, when you say environmental degradation, China's climate change policies are far more responsible than those of the United States, which has not once, but twice withdrawn from global environmental protocols. Kyoto Protocol, the Bush administration left eight years. Paris Accords, Trump administration left four years. And you know what? The reason why we're having climate change today is not because of new flows of greenhouse gas emissions from China and India. It's because of what the Western countries have put in the atmosphere since the Western Industrial Revolution. Get the data. The single largest contributor, cumulatively, right? It's number one, United States, number two, Europe, number three, China, right? And the West wants China to pay an economic price for the current flows, but the West doesn't want to pay an economic price for what it put in the atmosphere. You want to deprive the Indians of electricity when the United States could just, by the way, if the United States could impose a dollar a gallon tax, that would save the world. Cut down gasoline consumption, raise money for investment in green technology, simple solutions. And by contrast, the largest reforestation program in the world is carried out by China. It has already reforested an area the size of Belgium or bigger, right? So all your descriptions capture the natural distortions of China that you get in the Anglo-Saxon media, which violate the rules of the Enlightenment, which say that you must be rational, calm and objective, especially in understanding your adversary. And if the Chinese were as stupid and as incompetent as you describe them to be, don't worry about them. But I can assure you, you are now dealing with a far more intelligent and rational actor that doesn't fit any of the Anglo-Saxon categories that you applied to them. Please forgive my bluntness.

3 人回報・1 則回應・4 年前

以下的英文原文是菲律賓總統杜特蒂的良心發言，他原來是美國在西太平洋的馬前卒子，可是在他總統任上這些年，他一直在觀察中國，現在他對美國和中國做了最客觀的比較，以下是他極為中肯的評語:👍👍👍 *當你選擇美國時，你已經選擇了戰爭。如果你選擇了中國，你就是選擇了和平。 * 美國賣給菲律賓唯一重要的商品，就是「軍火」。價錢非常昂貴而是被他人秉棄的爛東西。 *中國出口的都是玉蜀黍、基礎建設，都是色彩繽紛的商品，只有蠢人和沒水準的人才看不見。 *美國只會製造仇恨、動亂、戰爭，騙人的投資，然後套取大量的財富回美國。製造仇恨可以讓大家向美國購買更多軍火武器。 *美國是世上最邪惡的國家，他要建立美元為唯一的國際流通貨幣，藉此美國人就可以坐收漁利。 *為了在市場不斷地套回美元，所以美國需要不斷地製造動亂和衝突，藉機出售大量武器。 *美國在歷史上239年打了222場戰爭。他們的手沾滿了無數無辜的人的鮮血。 *美國人到處宣揚他們的民主和人權，其實他們是人道、人權及反民主的真正邪惡國家，真的不知道他們的導彈在世上已經殺死了多少人？真正是一個名符其實的「吃人族國家」。 *到此為止，大家都非常清楚為何美國不能跟中國和平共存。 *美國不斷在高唱和平與建設，其實全是騙人的東西。 *中國才是真正在建立一個「命運共同體」的國家。一個善用不斷提升的國力，應用在科技，軍事和經濟實力，努力去維持世界和平。當然這也會讓美國會怒火冲天。 *世界本和平，為何美國要把世界弄成那麼亂？中國只希望在科技上發展成一個強大的國家，這樣一定會讓美國非常憤怒。所以在未來的中美鬥爭中，中國所行的路是互利及雙贏，而美國愛走自己的路。 * 我堅信中國絕對有能力去建立人類的正義和良知。創造高科技及高端產品來貢獻真正的「人類命運共同體」。👍👍👍 Reprinted, Philippine President Duterte's excellent comments on the US "pertinence" and "point": 👍👍👍 * When you choose the United States, you have chosen war. If you choose China, you choose peace. * The United States is only the only important commodity sold to the Philippines, which is "arms." The price is very expensive but it is a rotten thing that others have thrown away. * China exports all kinds of shushu, infrastructure, and colorful goods. Only stupid people and unqualified people cannot see them. * The United States likes to create hatred, turmoil, war, deceptive investments, and then take a lot of wealth back to the United States. Creating hatred will enable everyone to buy more arms from the United States. * The United States is the most evil country in the world. He wants to establish the U.S. dollar as the only international mobile currency, so that Americans can enjoy it. * In order to continuously recoup the US dollar in the market, the United States needs to continuously create turmoil and conflict, and it can take the opportunity to sell a large number of weapons. * The United States fought a total of 222 wars in 239 years in history. Their hands were stained with the blood of countless innocent people. * Americans like to promote their democracy and human rights everywhere. In fact, it is in a truly evil country of humanity, human rights and anti-democracy. I really don't know how many people their missiles have killed in the world. It is a veritable "cannibal country". * So far, everyone knows clearly why the United States cannot coexist with China. * The United States keeps singing about peace and building, all of which are deceiving things. * China is a country that truly builds a "fate community." An organization that makes good use of increasing national strength to apply scientific, technological, military, and economic strength to maintain world peace. Of course, this will also make the United States angry. * The world is peace. Why does the United States make the world so chaotic. China only hopes to develop into a powerful country in science and technology, which will definitely make the United States unhappy. * So in the future Sino-U.S. Struggle, China's path is mutual benefit and win-win, or Americans like to walk their own path. * I firmly believe that China is absolutely capable of building human justice and conscience. Create high-tech and high-end products to contribute to the true "community of human destiny". 👍👍👍

1 人回報・2 則回應・6 年前

*王毅外長* ：我國要做好準備面對 *未來三年* 的 *十大殘酷現實* ! 　王毅：2020年對中美關係來講是艱難的一年，這種艱難可能還會持續幾年時間，甚至會更長，因為 *到現在還沒有解藥* 。而在接下來的三年裡我們也需要去面對的十大殘酷現實！　　第一大殘酷現實： *中美關係是所有關係中的關鍵和核心* ，有一萬個理由可以證明搞好中美關係的重要性， *中國沒有成本優勢與美國對抗*。　　不是說中國怕美國，而是不值得玩對抗﹔在對待美國霸權問題上， *中國必須要運用智慧* 。防止失聯朋友圈更精彩你可以討厭美國、不喜歡美國、恨美國， *但不要影響去重視美國*。不是因為覺得美國好才與他搞好關係，僅僅是因為 *美國是“老大”* ，是 *遊戲規則的制定者* ，是 *中國最大的消費市場* ，這是 *一個殘酷的現實和事實* ，你不服不行。　　第二大殘酷現實： *現在的中國可以影響世界，但不能左右世界* 。目前能夠左右世界的只有美國，這個現實我們必須要接受。要知道：影響世界的國家有許多，況且這種影響也是有階段性的，你在影響別人的同時，別人 *也在影響你。世界萬物都是彼此影響的，所以 *不要有優越感* 。優越感會造成 *盲目自信* ，自信過頭就是 *自負*，自負過頭就會 *自命不凡*，最後只能是 *自作多情* 和 *自認倒霉* 了。第三大殘酷現實： *“中國模式”僅僅適用於中國* 。　　中國的高速發展是不能被複製制的。因為中國的歷史別國是沒有的，我們所受到的曲折、痛苦和折磨在人類歷史上是少有的，中國現在的發展模式是結合了中國國情而形成的一種模式。所以，不要動不動就想推銷“中國模式”，別人 *不會接受*，也會 *水土不服* 。　　第四大殘酷現實： *不要輕言戰爭* 。　　如果40年前中國說不怕戰爭，那是一種底氣，因為我們窮，光腳的不怕穿鞋的。但，如果你現在還說“不怕戰爭”，那是一種虛張聲勢。因為你已經“相當”富裕，你的北上廣深大城市已經與世界上任何大城市可以媲美。“羅馬城不是一日建成的”，但 *“毀掉羅馬城瞬間就可以實現”* 。　　美國人是世界上最怕戰爭的，因為他有最繁華的城市群，所以美國要發展世上最強大的軍隊，目的就是要 *“拒戰爭於萬里之外”* ，絕不讓戰爭在本土發生。中國現在還沒有這個能力，中國若與強大的敵人戰爭，必然是 *本土戰爭*，我們壯大軍隊不是渴望戰爭，而是要 *防止把戰爭引入家門*/。　　第五大殘酷現實： *中國永遠都是一個發展中的國家* 。　　我們的朋友圈永遠在第三世界。要牢記：西方那些發達國家是不會帶我們玩的，在他們的眼中 *永遠有“優越感”* 。 *西方永遠瞧不起我們的價值觀*，永遠認為中國“落後”。在西方人眼裡，永遠都存在 *“東西方差異”* 。千萬不要認為可以融入西方世界，天真地認為可以與 *西方平起平坐* ，中國與歐美僅僅是 *生意關係* ，是 *做不了真朋友的* 。　　第六大殘酷現實 *不要主動去向世界承諾什麼，更不要用錢去買地位，充當世界領袖* 。　　真正的領袖都不是主動申請的，而是 *受命於危難* ，都是 *被人強推上位的* 。所以，領袖不好當，吃力不討好。如果你成了世界領袖，那麼必須要放棄許多，全世界都要跟你玩“貿易順差”，你卻又不敢有脾氣。如果這領袖好當， *美國就不會混的現在這麼慘了* (在川普眼裡，美國混的最慘，是世界級的大傻瓜)。　　第七大殘酷現實： *中國已經回不去了* ，不可能因為“摸著石子過河”陷入了深水區就妄想退回去。　　時光不會倒流，不可能因為害怕風險而停止這場遊戲。從開始打開國門的那一天起，我們注定沒有回頭路可走， *國門必須是越開越大，陷阱必然是越走越多* 。 *不能輕言放棄*，更 *不能 “好了傷疤忘了疼”*。　　第八大殘酷現實： *不能為了追求“多快好省”而“超速上癮”* ，不要動不動就犯“大躍進”的毛病， *不要炫耀所謂“彎道超車”* 。　　不是因為你技術好，僅僅是一種僥倖。遵守規則從來就不是墨守陳規，講究信用也不是呆傻愚鈍。所有投機取巧的鑽空子結果都會是互相傷害， *出來混總要還的，越強大的人越把規則當生命看待* 。　　第九大殘酷現實： *你今天超越了別人，明天別人就會超越你* 。超越強者不是為了證明你的強大，而是要讓民眾享受到做強者的好處。事實證明：*真正聰明的人願意永遠是一個追隨者*，而 *不願意成為一個超越者* 。也許你覺得韜光養晦無法顯出英雄本色，但低調做人恰恰是深藏不露高手的基本素質。第十大殘酷現實： *所有用錢買來的朋友都靠不住* 。 “誰是我們的敵人？誰是我們的朋友？這是革命的首要問題”，真正的朋友恰恰是經常公開爭吵的、互相懟罵的。在你渴望用錢去收買別人的時候，一不小心就被別人利用了。真正強大的國家不是因為錢多而吸引別人，而是你的 *價值信仰* 和 *執政理念* *深深讓人折服*。　　現實往往都是 *殘酷* 的，甚至是 *殘忍* 的。但是，許多時候並不是因為殘酷而使人不敢正視現實，僅僅是因為 *缺乏自信而曲解了現實* 。　　—— *王毅* 王毅把天下興亡說得非常透徹，句句擲地有聲! 轉自 ”人民的曙光” *Wang Yi Foreign Minister*: my country should be ready to face the *ten cruel realities* of the next *three years*! Wang Yi: 2020 will be a difficult year for China-US relations, and this difficulty may continue for several years, or even longer, because *there is no antidote*. And in the next three years, we also need to face the ten cruel realities! The first cruel reality: *Sino-US relations are the key and core of all relations*, there are 10,000 reasons to prove the importance of doing well in Sino-US relations, *China has no cost advantage against the US*. It is not that China is afraid of the United States, but it is not worth playing against; *China must use wisdom* in dealing with the issue of American hegemony. You can hate the United States, dislike the United States, hate the United States, but *don't affect the importance of the United States*. It's not because he thinks the United States is good that he has a good relationship with him, but only because *the United States is the "boss"*, the maker of the *rules of the game*, and the largest consumer market in China. *This is a cruel reality and fact* , *You can't not accept it.* The second cruel reality: *Now China can influence the world, but it cannot control the world*. At present, only the United States can control the world. We must accept this reality. You must know that there are many countries that influence the world, and this influence is also phased. While you are influencing others, others are also influencing you. Everything in the world affects each other, so *don't feel superior*. Superiority will lead to *blind self-confidence*, too much self-confidence is *conceited*, too much self-confidence will be *pretentious*, and in the end it can only be *self-consciousness* and *self-confessed bad luck*. Third cruel reality: *The "China model" only applies to China*. China's rapid development cannot be replicated. Because China has no other country in its history, and the twists, pains and tortures we have suffered are rare in human history. China's current development model is a model formed by combining China's national conditions. So, don't try to sell the "Chinese model" at every turn. Others *will not accept* and *will not acclimatize*. The fourth cruel reality: *Don't talk about war lightly*. If China said 40 years ago that it is not afraid of war, it would have been a kind of confidence, because we are poor, and those who are barefoot are not afraid of wearing their feet. But if you still say "not afraid of war" now, that's a bluff. Because you are already "pretty" wealthy, your big cities in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen are comparable to any big city in the world. "The city of Rome was not built in a day", but *"destroyed the city of Rome in an instant"*. Americans are the one most afraid of war in the world, because they have the most prosperous urban agglomeration, so the purpose of the United States to develop the most powerful army in the world is to *"held back war from thousands of miles away"*, and never let war occur in the homeland. China does not have this capability yet. If China fights a powerful enemy, it must be a *local war*. We are not longing for war to grow our army, but to *prevent war from being introduced into our homes*. The fifth cruel reality: *China will always be a developing country*. Our circle of friends is always in the third world. Remember: those developed countries in the West will not take us to play, and in their eyes *always have a "sense of superiority"*. *The West will always look down on our values* and always consider *China to be "backward"*. In the eyes of Westerners, there will always be *"East-West differences"*. Don't think that you can *integrate into the Western world*, and *naively think that you can*. The sixth cruel reality *Don't take the initiative to promise anything to the world, let alone use money to buy status and act as a world leader*. The real leaders are not actively applying to be one, but *accept the mission under dangerous and difficult condition*, and *they are all being pushed to the position by force*. Therefore, it is not easy to be a leader, and it is *thankless* . If you become a world leader, you have to *give up a lot* . The whole world wants to play a "trade surplus" with you, but you don't dare to have a temper. If this leader is good, *the United States will not be so miserable now* (In Trump's eyes, the United States is the worst, and it is a world-class fool). The seventh cruel reality: *China has no way to go back*, it is impossible to go back because of "crossing the river by feeling the stones" and falling into the deep water area. Time will not go back, it is impossible to stop this game because of fear of risk. From the day we started to open the country's door, we are destined to have no turning back. *The country's door must be opened wider and wider, and come across more traps as you move among . *Can't give up lightly*, and *can't "get rid of the scar and forget the pain"*. The eighth cruel reality: *You can't be "addicted to speeding" in pursuit of "more speed and better savings"*, don't make the "Great Leap Forward" at every turn, *don't show off the so-called "curve overtaking"*. It's not because of your skill, it's just a fluke. Obeying the rules is never sticking to the old rules, and paying attention to credit is not stupid. All opportunistic exploits will result in mutual harm, and the more powerful people will treat the rules as life. The ninth cruel reality: *You surpass others today, others will surpass you tomorrow*. Overtaking the strong ones is not to prove your strength, but to let the people enjoy the benefits of being a strong ones. It turns out: *Really smart people are willing to always be a follower*, and *will not be a transcender/surpasser*. Maybe you think that keeping a low profile cannot show the true character of a hero, but being a low-key person is precisely the basic quality of a *master who is hidden* . Tenth cruel reality: *all friends bought with money are unreliable*. "Who are our enemies? Who are our friends? This is the primary question of the revolution." *The real friends are those who often quarrel openly and scold each other*. When you are eager to bribe others with money, you are accidentally used by others. A truly powerful country is not attracted to others because of more money, but because of your *value beliefs* and *governing ideas* *deeply convincing*. Reality is often *cruel*, even *brutal . However, many times it is not because of cruelty that people dare not face reality, but because of *lack of self-confidence and distorted reality*. —— *Wang Yi* Wang Yi explained the rise and fall of the world very clearly, and every sentence is powerful! From "The Dawn of the People"。

6 人回報・1 則回應・4 年前

今天讀到前澳大利亞首相 John Menadue 的公共政策雜誌“Pearls and Irritations ”刊登的文章：《Strategists admit West is goading China into war 戰略家承認西方正在煽動中國參戰》。這個戰略計劃，如同美國激怒俄羅斯發動烏克蘭戰争，指明美國也想激怒中國發動台海戰争，而戰爭的損失將是两岸的中國人民，但這正是典型的美国利益至上的大戰略。以下是其中兩小段的英文原文和中文翻譯，其餘的英文部分可請各位自讀。 1. US military experts say a war over Taiwan is desirable, because Asia’s growth to become world’s economic heartland has become unstoppable. 美國軍方專家表示，台灣的戰爭是可行的，因為亞洲成為世界經濟中心的增長已經不可阻擋。 Yes, we want war. But just a small one, please, followed by a quick surrender. The United States is diligently working with Australia and the UK to goad China into what they hope will be a limited war over Taiwan, according to military strategists. By continually poking at the giant developing nation, the aim is to force it to fire the first bullet — and then use that to paint China as the protagonist, the bully that the rest of the world must unite against. 是的，我們想要戰爭。但請只發起一個小型戰爭，然後快速的投降。據軍事戰略家們透漏，美國正在與澳大利亞和英國密切合作，以促使中國進入他們所希望的針對台灣的有限戰爭。要不斷的戳戳這個發展中的巨大中國，目的是迫使它發射第一顆子彈——然後用戰爭把中國描繪成主角，世界其他地區必會聯合起來反對這個惡霸。 To prepare for this, the partners in the scheme are teaming up. Rather like the “coalition of the willing” in the Iraq War 2.0, the US is pushing for another misadventure, this time through a coalition of the coerced. 為了做準備，該計劃的夥伴們正在合作。就像伊拉克戰爭 2.0 中的“自願聯盟”一樣，美國正在推動另一場災難，這一次是通過另一個聯盟來脅迫。 2. People will die 人民會死亡 But won’t there be Taiwanese casualties? Yes. China “must be permitted to strike as indiscriminately as possible,” in this scenario. “Colby further urges the US not to provide potential civilian targets with air defences, reasoning that collateral damage will whip up the public anger against China necessary to winning a war,” Roussinos adds. 但是這樣豈不是會造成台灣人民的傷亡嗎？是的，在這種情況下，中國“必須被允許不分青紅皂白地進行打擊（台灣）”。 “Colby進一步敦促美國，不要為潛在的平民標吧提供防空系統，理由是附帶的死亡損害將會激起公眾對中國的憤怒，這是對贏得戰爭所必需的，”Roussinos補充道。 In other words, deaths of Taiwan citizens (the “collateral damage” he mentions) would be a public relations coup for the US side. 換句話說，台灣公民的死亡（他提到的“附帶的死亡損害”）將是美方的公關妙招。 “Forcing China to escalate could be in our [US] interests,” Roussinos points out. Roussinos指出 “迫使中國升級戰爭，可能符合我們[美國]的利益”。 https://johnmenadue.com/strategists-admit-west-is-goading-china-into-war/

23 人回報・1 則回應・4 年前

英國中文僑報最近訪問在英國的習近平前妻柯玲玲，她比習大兩歲，1979-1982年結婚三年，離婚後留學英國，現任醫生和教授。這是有關習早年婚姻狀況的首次披露。1951 年出生，64 歲的柯小明（柯玲玲）是原中國駐英大使柯華的小女兒，她也是習近平的前妻。受過良好教育的柯玲玲，目前她是倫敦一家私立醫院的高級主任，也是倫敦大學亞非醫學院的客座教授。她在近日接受了英國《僑報》的採訪。 1979年柯玲玲與習近平結婚，因為價值觀與性格的不同，1982年，她與結婚三年的習近平離婚，移民英國。而那時的習近平正競選正定縣委書記，習近平毅然放棄了與柯玲玲一同移民英國的機會，並指責柯玲玲貪戀西方繁華。經多次勸說讓習近平移民無效，兩人最終分道揚鑣。與習近平離婚，你覺得後悔嗎？柯：在那個年代，離婚其實是一件非常重要的事情，我和習近平的婚姻很短暫，很重要的一點就是我們幾乎沒有共同點，談不上什麼後悔不後悔的。他以前是一個很執著的人，想幹一番大事業，反正好像我說的話他都聽不進去，所以我才選擇了離婚這條路。距離不可能讓我們產生現實的婚姻和感情。當時我的父親是非常反對的，他總是認為我做事很魯莽。你們之後有聯繫過嗎？柯：在我去英國的前三年裡，他幾乎每週都打電話給我，你知道那個年代從中國打電話到英國是不方便的，中國還沒有普及電話，條件不比現在，但是我一個電話都沒有接聽過，這讓他非常傷心。我知道他也曾經試圖挽回這段婚姻，我當時是鐵了心了。久而久之，我們也就沒有什麼聯繫了。我知道他心裡還是有這份感情的。你當時會想到習近平會成為中國的領導人嗎？柯：沒有，完全不會這樣去想。他成為中國國家主席，我是非常替他高興的，因為我離開他的時候，他還只是個科級幹部。他是一個很有理想的人，我一直認為他很有潛能，但在當時他的潛能對我而言一無是處。你覺得在你心裡，習近平是一個怎麼樣的人？柯：雖然我和他在一起的時候，大部分時間我們經常發生爭吵，分歧很大，但是我還是認為他是一個正直的人。他不會像其他人一樣，昧著良心去做一些利己的事情，這是我以前非常看重他的一點。以前我認為他太過於固執，也可能是因為我們相處的時間很短暫，我對他不是很瞭解吧。現在回過頭來看，其實他做的很多事情都是對的，只是自己當年太年輕，比較容易衝動。他不是一個理想主義者，他做事是有規劃，有步驟的。我可能會更理想主義一些，畢竟女性都會喜歡懂得浪漫的男人，但是習近平不是，我很多時候覺得他過於刻板，這與我們的成長環境和教育背景有很大關係。離婚以後的那麼多年，你們都沒有見過面嗎？柯：他還是國家副主席的時候，我們在深圳見過一次。那是我，我姐姐，還有我父親回深圳掃墓，他當時來深圳考察工作，慰問了我父親，我當時也在，他跟我們全家人握了握手，包括我。其實是很尷尬的一次會面，大概一起坐了半個小時，聊了一些東西，我只覺得他看上去老了許多。習近平會在 10 月訪英，你有什麼期待？柯：中國使館那邊已經透過一些管道邀請我作為英國僑界的代表參加一個歡迎宴會，他上任中共總書記三年，第一次來英國訪問，對中英兩國都是有好處的，我作為英國的華人，感到很榮幸，也很高興。 Above message in English from Google translator. British Chinese Overseas Chinese News recently interviewed Ke Lingling, Xi Jinping’s ex-wife in the UK. She was two years older than Xi Jinping, married for three years from 1979 to 1982, and studied in the UK after her divorce. She is now a doctor and professor. This is the first disclosure of Xi's early marital status. Born in 1951, 64-year-old Ke Xiaoming (Ke Lingling) is the youngest daughter of Ke Hua, the former Chinese ambassador to the UK, and Xi Jinping's ex-wife. Ke Lingling, who is well educated, is currently a senior director of a private hospital in London and a visiting professor at the School of Asian and African Medicine, University of London. She recently accepted an interview with the British "Qiao Bao". Ke Lingling married Xi Jinping in 1979. Because of her differences in values and personalities, she divorced Xi Jinping who had been married for three years in 1982 and immigrated to the UK. At that time, Xi Jinping was running for the secretary of the Zhengding County Party Committee. Xi Jinping resolutely gave up the opportunity to immigrate to the UK with Ke Lingling, and accused Ke Lingling of being greedy for Western prosperity. After repeated persuasion to make Xi Jinping's immigration invalid, the two finally parted ways. Do you regret divorcing Xi Jinping? Ke: In those days, divorce was actually a very important matter. My marriage with Xi Jinping was very short. The important point is that we have almost nothing in common, so there is no regret or regret. He used to be a very persistent person and wanted to start a big career. Anyway, he didn't seem to listen to what I said, so I chose the road of divorce. It is impossible for us to have a realistic marriage and relationship with distance. My father was very against it at the time, he always thought I was reckless. Have you been in touch since then? Ke: In the first three years when I went to the UK, he called me almost every week. You know that it was inconvenient to call from China to the UK at that time. China has not yet popularized telephones, and the conditions are not as good as now, but I alone None of the calls were answered, which made him very sad. I know that he also tried to save this marriage, and I was determined at that time. Over time, we lost touch with each other. I know he still has this feeling in his heart. Did you think that Xi Jinping would become the leader of China? Ke: No, I don't think so at all. He became the President of China, and I am very happy for him, because when I left him, he was just a department-level cadre. He was an ideal guy, I always thought he had potential, but at the time his potential meant nothing to me. What kind of person do you think Xi Jinping is in your heart? Ke: Although when I was with him, we often quarreled and had great differences most of the time, but I still think he is an upright person. Like other people, he will not do some selfish things against his conscience. This is what I valued him very much before. In the past, I thought he was too stubborn, maybe it was because the time we spent together was very short, and I didn't know him very well. Looking back now, in fact, many things he did were right, but he was too young and impulsive. He is not an idealist, he does things in a planned and step-by-step manner. I may be more idealistic. After all, women will like men who understand romance, but Xi Jinping is not. I often think that he is too rigid. This has a lot to do with our growth environment and educational background. Haven't you met each other for so many years after the divorce? Ke: We met once in Shenzhen when he was the vice president of the country. That was me, my sister, and my father went back to Shenzhen to visit the grave. He came to Shenzhen to inspect work and condolences to my father. I was there at the time. He shook hands with our whole family, including me. In fact, it was an awkward meeting. We sat together for about half an hour and talked about some things. I just think he looks much older. Xi Jinping will visit the UK in October, what do you expect? Ke: The Chinese embassy has invited me through some channels to attend a welcome banquet as a representative of the British overseas Chinese community. He has been the general secretary of the Communist Party of China for three years, and his first visit to the UK is beneficial to both China and the UK. British Chinese feel very honored and very happy.

2 人回報・2 則回應・3 年前

CNN 對台積電董事長劉德音的專訪翻譯逐字稿 On GPS: Can China afford to attack Taiwan? Fareed Zakaria, GPS In a rare interview with Mark Liu, chairman of Taiwan's TSMC — Asia's most valuable company — Fareed asks about the ongoing tension between the self-governing island and Beijing. Source: CNN Fareed Zakaria: 如果中國攻打台灣，那會如何影響台灣，以及台灣的經濟? What would happen to Taiwan, and to the Taiwanese economy, if China were to invade? 劉德音: 噢，當然，戰場上沒有贏家；所有人都是輸家。台灣人已在台灣建立起自己的民主系統，然後他們想過自己的生活。雖然半導體產業對台灣整體經濟來說十分重要，但如果真的發生戰爭的話，那或許半導體業不是最需要我們擔心的事。我們真正需要擔心的是這場戰爭將會摧毀以具有穩定秩序的世界經貿活動(the destruction of the world rule-based order)；整個地理政治將會有劇烈的變化。 Oh, of course, the war brings no winners. Everybody is losers. And people in Taiwan has earned their democratic system in Taiwan, and they want to choose their way of life. And we think that indeed the chip supply is a critical business and economy in Taiwan, but had it -- had it been a War in Taiwan, probably the chip is not the most important thing we should worry about because this invasion, if it comes after, is the destruction of the world rule-based order. There is no -- the geopolitical landscape would totally change. Fareed Zakaria: 你會擔心台灣目前在中國半導體供應鏈上所扮演的核心角色嗎? 這會對台灣造成甚麼危險嗎? 還是說其實有戰略上的嚇阻效果? 畢竟有時大家會說台積電是台灣的護國神山。不過即便如此，我們還是知道中國一直都強調「我們對台灣有絕對的主權，而且這是我們不可退讓的中國資產」。 Do you worry that Taiwan is now so integral to the Chinese supply chain at the high end?.. Does that create a danger for Taiwan? Or is it a deterrent? People sometimes talk about the TSMC shield, but you could equally see Beijing saying we need to have total control of this. This is the most valuable asset and it's outside our borders. 劉德音: 嗯，沒有國家能夠用武力控制台積電的，因為如果中國解放軍真的入侵台積電，台積電就完全不能運作了，因為這是一個十分複雜的龐大組織。台積電從原料、化學物質、設備零件、工程軟體與檢測等各面向都隨時都需要跟外面的世界，歐洲、日本、美國相互溝通合作。是在世界上的所有人的努力才能讓這間公司，台積電，能夠正常運作。所以假如你用武力侵占了台積電，那台積電就不可能正常運作了，也就沒有所謂的台積電了。至於我們與中國的生意，目前中國大概占了我們 10% 的生意吧，但我們只會跟一般企業與消費者做生意，我們不會將晶片賣給軍事組織。我們覺得說，消費市場是很重要的，而且是生生不息的。如果消費者有需求，那我想，跟他們做生意並不是甚麼壞事。 Ok. Nobody can control TSMC by force. If you take a military force or invasion, you will render TSMC factory not operable because this is such a sophisticated manufacturing facility. It depends on the real-time connection with the outside world, with Europe, with Japan, with the US, from materials, to chemicals, to spare parts, to engineering software, diagnosis. It's everybody's effort to make this factory operable. So if you take it over by force, you can no longer make it operable. In terms of the China business, its today composed about 10% of our business. We only work with consumer. We don't work with militaries entity. We think that is, the consumer pool, is important, and it is vibrant. And if they need us, it's not a bad thing. Fareed Zakaria: 解釋一下，為什麼這(台積電跟中國做生意)不是壞事? Expand on that. Why is it not a bad thing? 劉德音: 噢，這是因為我們停止運作後將會為中國帶來巨大的經濟損失，因為他們最先進的半導體晶片突然就這樣消失了，所以他們在做這種"武力犯台"之前，我想必定會三思而後行的。你看烏克蘭戰爭，我想我們都得從中好好反省與汲取些經驗。人們認為烏克蘭跟台灣非常像，但我得說台灣跟烏克蘭非常不一樣。想想烏俄戰爭對各國帶來的種種負面影響，對任何國家來說都不是好事。從西方世界、俄羅斯與烏克蘭的角度來看，都是輸家，沒有人從中獲得好處。我真的認為大家都應該要好好反省這場戰爭究竟為我們人類帶來了甚麼，想想我們應該要如何避免戰爭，想想我們該如何確保全球經濟的穩定，如何讓全球經濟能持續生生不息，而且也讓我們以公平的方式相互競爭，這是我的想法。 Oh, because our interruption will create great economic turmoil in either side in China because suddenly their most advanced components supply disappeared. And -- and it is an interruption, I must say. So people will think twice on this. I think the Ukraine war, I think we should draw lessons from it. People think Ukraine will make connected with the Taiwan Strait. They are very different. But in case you think about imperil, Ukraine war is not good for any of the sides. From the Western world, from Russia, from Ukraine, it's lose, lose, lose scenarios. All three sides ought to draw lessons. I think they do. And we should use that lessons to look at the lens on Taiwan. How can we avoid a war? How can we ensure no -- the world economy -- the engine of the world economy continue humming and let's have a fair competition. That's what I think. Fareed Zakaria: 就你看來，你會怎麼解釋台灣的經濟奇蹟? 在過去五十年裡，台灣經濟成功達到每年有 5% 的經濟成長。世上很少能夠有著像台灣經濟成長幅度這樣的國家，你怎麼看呢? From your perspective, what explains the Taiwan miracle? This is now a place that has grown at 5% a year for five decades. There are very few places in the world that have managed that. What explains the Taiwan miracle? 劉德音: 從外人的角度來看，會覺得這是一個奇蹟。但對認真工作的台灣人來說，這只是奮鬥的過程。老實說我覺得，相較於其他國家，尤其是在亞洲，我覺得台灣其中一個特點在於它那和平的社會。從 1949 年到現在，台灣一直都是相當和平的。這是個和平的地方。而在這期間，台灣從威權主義社會轉型成民主國家，變成一個民主社會。而如果你從整個世界的角度來看這點，如此這般和平的社會轉型是相當神奇的事情，我們是非常幸運的。而如果真要說奇蹟，我想台灣的確還有一點是相當與眾不同的，那就是我們的教育制度。在我還小的時候，只有 10% 的人上大學。如今有 80% 的年輕人擁有大學文憑。我們政府設立了非常多間大學，所以對於所有年輕人來說，如果你想讀大學，那一定可以讀，只要你願意花時間，所以這建立了一個相對高品質的社會環境，以面對未來可能的種種挑戰，這是我覺得非常非常特別的一點。 Looking from outside, it appears to be a miracle. For the people working hard on the island, it is just a history of fighting. I think, to be honest, compared with other nations, particularly in Asia, I think one of the key components in Taiwan is a peaceful society. It maintained peace since 1949 till today, 70 years. It's a peaceful island. And during that period of time, Taiwan has transformed from authoritarian state into a democratic state, became a democratic society. This is marvelous because if you look at the nations around the world, having such a smooth transition, peaceful transition, we are fortunate, to be honest. But if you talk about the miracles, I also think there's one thing that is very distinctly different, is the education system. When I was young, only 10% of the young people entered college or universities. Today, 80% of the young people have college or university degrees. The government set up many colleges, universities. And every kid, if you want to go to university, you can go, and just so long as you spend time. So that has created a relatively good quality of population in Taiwan, posing for any change ahead. That's why I think that's very, very special. Fareed Zakaria: 為什麼其他人都很難做出你做的晶片呢? 我現在在想的是你們的七奈米，美國有非常多擁有輝煌歷史的偉大公司，像是 Intel。而中國則是撒了數十億的資金去開設晶圓廠，但都沒有人能做出你們的晶片。 Why is it so difficult for anyone to make the chips that you make? And I'm thinking now about the 7 nanometer. The Americans have these great companies that have huge history, like Intel. The Chinese pour tens of billions of dollars into new companies. But no one can make the chips you make. 劉德音: 嗯，可以啊，只是晚幾年而已，就...哈哈哈哈... Well, they can, just a few years later. It's ... hahaha ... Fareed Zakaria: 但這就是重點啊... But that's all the difference in this business. 劉德音: 沒錯，這是唯一的關鍵。我想我們是把半導體技術本身看做是一門科學，但也是一門生意。這不是組裝零件那樣而已。當然，這一切都得歸功於我們與其他夥伴的合作。我們的工程師甚至因為 COVID 而戴上 AR (擴充虛擬實境) 跟遠在荷蘭以及加州的工程師合作，我們就是這麼密切的合作，共同推進最先進的半導體技術。我只能說這麼多了，沒辦法跟你透漏與解釋所有細節。 You're right. That's all the difference. I think we treat the semiconductor technology itself as a business, as a science. It's not assembly workers. And, of course, I credit this to be working with our partners. Even the COVID time, our engineer used the AR, augmented reality, lenses to work with engineer in Netherland, work with engineer in California. And that's how close we work together. And together, we push the frontier of the semiconductor technologies. I cannot tell you everything why. Fareed Zakaria: 哦當然你不可能跟我說可口可樂的配方的...哈哈...。好，最後一個問題，在技術與經濟層面上，你會怎麼看待未來? 你的願景是甚麼? You're not going to tell me the secret formula of coca cola. Finally, tell me what you think will look like in the future, technologically, economically. What are your hopes? 劉德音: 我希望我們不會因為很接近中國而被歧視(discriminated)。不論我們跟中國的關係是甚麼，台灣就是台灣。你得把台灣視為一個整體，視為一個充滿活力與衝勁的社會。我們希望能為世界帶來創新，並持續不斷地推進未來，而不會因為我們跟中國有些紛爭而害怕我們。這實在是不值得。 I hope that we don't get discriminated because we are close to China. No matter your relationship with China, Taiwan is Taiwan. You have to look at Taiwan as, by itself, a vibrant society. We want to unleash the innovation for the world, into the future, continuously, and not to be scared because we have some dispute with our neighbors. And that is not worth it. Fareed Zakaria: 這你這樣好像是在跟世界說 ── 如果我理解錯誤請糾正我 ── 不要害怕中國說的那些話。因為中國永遠不可能接手台灣。台灣經濟是建立於全球合作，建立於信任與公開透明之上。如果他們侵入台灣，他們會發現實際上他們甚麼也沒拿到。 But it seems to me you're saying to the world -- correct me if I'm wrong -- you're saying to the world, don't be scared by what China is saying because the Chinese will never be able to take. The Taiwanese economy is built on this global collaboration, -- on trust, on openness, on -- they'll find they've taken over nothing, if they come in. 劉德音: 正確，沒錯，我的確是這麼想的，所以我們大家只會為彼此帶來災難，每一方都是如此。雖然我們得做最壞打壞，但還是盡量往最好的方向看齊。 Correct, yes, I do believe so. So the world can only create problem on three sides, all three sides. And that is -- we need to prepare the worst, but we should hope for the best. Fareed Zakaria: 你剛有提到烏克蘭戰爭是 lose-lose-lose，所以你希望可以 win-win-win。 So you said about the Ukraine war, it's lose-lose-lose. Your hope is for a win-win-win. 劉德音: 對，如果真的開戰了，那就會變成這樣。如果一切和平，那麼就只跟我們三方的競爭策略有關，我想在商場上沒有人會想要發生戰爭，所以我們又為什麼要再跳進這個陷阱(戰爭)裡呢? Yes, if you have a war, then it will be that. If this is peaceful, well, it's upon the competition strategies on all three sides. And I think that nobody in the business world want to see a war happen. And why do we jump again into another trap? Fareed Zakaria: 感謝你寶貴的時間。 Thank you for taking so much time 劉德音: 很高興能參與訪談。 We enjoy talking to you. (zero game 2)(sun over mountain)(praying)

7 人回報・1 則回應・4 年前

歷史哥澄清唬 https://www.facebook.com/525231778007287/posts/914879449042516/ 【澄清唬爆米花教室：被大內宣淹沒的美國總統署名投書】先說這篇沒有圖，因為太重要不能亂放圖在歷史上，從沒有美國總統親自投書到中華民國的報紙。但是在109年10月22日，美國準總統拜登以「More Prosperous Future For Our Families」(定稿中文標題：為我們家庭更繁榮的未來)，以華人為主體，台灣人為核心訴求，投書聯合報系的世界日報，強調他願意與中國合作而非對抗，鄙棄川普的仇中獵巫，願意與華人聯手，但更重視台灣人的健保經驗，不願台灣人為美國火中取栗而是共同繁榮。但在一片大奇特的大內宣中，美國準總統的投書竟然在台灣地區被忽視。且不說拜登明明在聲譽卓著的 IBD/TIPP民調持續領先，比起川普根本鼓吹台灣人火中取栗(你對抗，我賺軍火，去跟大陸人死嗑來增加我談判勒索本錢)。拜登不只親自署名投書，還誠懇說明他對台灣/兩岸的四大重點，根本是史上最誠懇與重要的待遇。既然親綠親川普主流媒體不報，那福編來報。 ★ 一、拜登堅持稱台灣是 leading democracy (領導性的民主政體)，表示其無意支持台獨立場(不稱國家) 二、拜登大篇幅強調川普仇中、卸責不科學的推卸問題給中國，造成亞裔的困擾與災難，而這不是美國總統應為。(打了那些整天喊支那賤畜以為自己就會成為高等美國人的台灣地區背祖中國人的臉) 三、拜登大談健保對一般百姓重要性，表示他珍視台灣的健保經驗，也是未來與台灣的合作重心。四、與其獵巫與仇中，他更重視與中國的合作，希望聯盟對世界更有幫助(雖然舉例醫療與氣候，但也只是舉例) 表示願意以兩大強權的合作，謀取更多世界利益。其他我不多說，請看原文與譯文。 #拜登給中華民國台灣與聯合報系的面子真的太大了 #聯合報系真正展現實力 #美國總統投書首中華民國系報紙 #大內宣只在意把我們當馬前卒的喇叭川普為我們家庭更繁榮的未來／前副總統喬瑟夫．拜登時局多艱，我們國家處在十字路口，正面臨疾病大流行、經濟大衰退，和一場將決定我們未來很長一段時間的選舉。今年我們看到美國最好的一面今年，我們看到美國最好的一面引領我們向前：英勇的醫師、護士、日常雜貨商、餐館業主、必要行業工作者 — 而其中，包括許許多多的亞裔美國人。今年我們也看到美國最糟情況但我們也看到最糟的情況：亞裔美國人誤因新冠病毒遭仇視的行為比比皆是，某種程度上，是因為川普總統發布的仇恨言論所致。亞裔美國人被責備、被唾罵、被攻擊；家園、商家和汽車被侮辱性標記破壞；年幼的孩童被刺傷，還有一名89歲的奶奶，在不斷升級的仇恨文化中遭人火焚。這不該是我們原本的樣子。亞裔美國人使我們國家變強大近兩個世紀以來，亞裔美國人使我們的國家變得強大 — 從掘金礦工，到加速我們崛起的鐵路和工廠工人，再到推動我們向前邁進的科學家、建築師、藝術家和企業家們。多年來，他們的勇氣、犧牲和成功，為美國夢注入動力，也讓美國穩為自由的燈塔與世界的希望。川普卻不懂傷了移民國價值觀川普總統不懂這些。他帶頭攻擊我們作為移民之國的價值觀，甚至在我們的邊境，拆散成千上萬的孩童與父母。即便在這場大流行到來之前，我們的仇恨犯罪就已達到16年以來的新高。而如今，為了轉移自己抗疫失敗、未能保護我們國家的過失，無論是否因此導致上千反亞裔的種族歧視事件，他仍堅持把新冠病毒稱作「中國病毒」。作為總統我捍衛每人的美國夢措辭很重要，總統措辭更為重要。作為總統，我將捍衛每個人的美國夢，讓每一勤奮努力的家庭，享有通向繁榮和美好未來的公平機會。我將反對任何形式的種族歧視，指示司法部優先處理仇恨犯罪，以彌合仇恨與分裂的傷口，而非煽風點火。川普失敗他讓我們的經濟崩盤唐納德·川普早在今年1月就已知道新冠病毒的致命性，卻未採取任何行動。現在，超過22萬美國人因此失去生命，約3000萬人失去工作、工時和薪水，五分之一的小商家關門。川普失敗的領導力讓我們的經濟崩盤 — 他總統當得愈久，得以完全回歸正軌的時間也愈久。我會控制疫情讓我們重回生機八個月過去了，川普仍然沒有(抗疫)計畫。而我有。首先要擔起責任，努力控制疫情，讓我們重回生機。我將執行早在3月就擬定的計畫，擊敗新冠病毒。我將聽取科學家、專家的意見；保護我們的家庭；讓新冠檢測、治療， #以及最終的疫苗免費，並對所有人開放。我會重建經濟實質救助小商家我將馬上開始重建更好的經濟，為數百萬遭受重創的小商家提供實質救助。他們是我們社區的生命線 — 但川普腐敗的復甦作法棄他們於不顧，只把紓困資金匯集到大公司手中。75%的亞裔小企業主，未能獲得任何首輪紓困金。這是錯誤的，我已要求確保員工在50人以下的小企業獲得紓困金，我也將增加他們獲得優惠和資金的長遠渠道，減輕阻礙移民業主的語言障礙。我不會對年收40萬元以下者加稅質言之，我的經濟復甦計畫將回報以工作，而不只是財富，將創造未來數百萬優薪工作。(信評機構)穆迪的獨立經濟學者發現，比起川普總統的作法，我的計畫會創造多出700萬的工作，以及超過1兆元的經濟增長。我也不會對任何年收入40萬元以下者加稅 —別懷疑。相反地，我還將確保超級富豪和大公司最終支付本應承擔的份額。讓父母能付學費讓醫保更平價我一路走來，都在為工薪和中產家庭而戰；他們之中有許多勤勉奮鬥的移民，來到美國是為更好的生活。我將幫助父母有能力支付子女的優質教育、提高教師薪酬，並讓絕大多數家庭免費就讀公立學院。我將讓照顧年邁父母變得更容易，讓醫療保險更平價。川普現在要通過法院，廢除「可負擔健保法」，在一場致命大流行之中，剝奪數千萬人的醫療保險，這毫無道理。與盟友並肩深化與台灣的關係同時，新冠病毒證明美國不能自外於世界。從重建我們最親近夥伴的關係開始，我們必須與其他國家攜手合作，應對影響我們所有人的國際挑戰。我們是一個太平洋強國，將與盟友並肩，增進我們在亞太地區共享的繁榮、安全與價值。這其中就包括深化與台灣這個居領先地位的民主政體、主要經濟體，以及科技重鎮的關係。台灣也是開放社會可以有效控制新冠病毒的閃亮典範。更新領導力符合美利益與中合作我們應對中國的方式，會聚焦增強美國競爭力，再興國內優勢，並更新我們在海外的聯盟與領導力。我們將在符合美國利益的領域與中國合作，包括公共衛生和氣候變遷。讓家庭團聚修復破碎的移民系統美國向來不只靠強大的國力，而是用身為榜樣的實力領導世界。要切實重現此景，我們也必須修復破碎的移民系統，讓家庭團聚，確保美國繼續吸引全球最出色與最聰明的人。我將會傾聽重塑我們熱愛的國魂我競選是為讓美國更好的重建，重建美國作為一個充滿機會，團結和有全新開始的國家；一個由數代移民讓其強大的地方；一個所有人都能發聲、每張選票都有價值的地方。我將引領這些議題，更重要的是，我會傾聽。所以，請確保你今天將選票投出。讓我們一起，重塑我們熱愛的國魂。 (世界日報華盛頓記者羅曉媛／譯) More Prosperous Future For Our Families by Former Vice President Joseph Biden for World Journal These are tough times. Our country is at a crossroads, facing a pandemic, a recession, and an election that will decide our futures for a very long time. This year, we've seen the best of America carry us forward: heroic doctors, nurses, grocers, restaurant owners, essential workers–including so many Asian Americans. But we've also seen the worst: acts of hate against Asian Americans wrongly blamed for COVID-19, spurred on, in part, by hateful rhetoric from President Trump. They've been screamed at, spit on, and assaulted. Homes, businesses, and cars vandalized with slurs. Small children stabbed. An 89-year-old grandmother set on fire amid this rising culture of hate. This is not who we are. For nearly two centuries, Asian Americans have made our country strong–from the gold miners and railroad and factory workers who helped to power our rise; to the scientists, architects, artists, and entrepreneurs who are helping to drive us forward now. For years, their courage, sacrifices, and success have powered the American Dream and helped America stand as a beacon of freedom and hope to the world. President Trump doesn't get that. He has led an assault on our values as a nation of immigrants, even tearing thousands of children from their parents' arms at our border. Hate crimes against people are at a 16-year-high, even before this pandemic. And now, to deflect blame for his failure to protect our nation from this crisis, he insists on calling COVID-19 the "China virus," no matter how many thousands of reported racist incidents against Asian Americans it encourages. Words matter – and a president's words matter even more. As President, I'll defend the American Dream for everyone, so every hardworking family has the same fair shot at prosperity and a better future. I'll stand against racism in every form, directing the Justice Department to prioritize hate crimes, and working to heal the wounds of hatred and division, not fan the flames. Donald Trump knew how deadly COVID-19 was back in January and did nothing to stop it. Now, more than 220,000 Americans are dead. Some 30 million have lost jobs, hours, wages. One in five small businesses have shut down. Trump's failed leadership has tanked our economy – and the longer he's president, the longer it'll take to get it fully up and running again. We're eight months in, but Trump still has no plan. I do. It starts with taking responsibility and doing the hard work to control this pandemic and get our lives back. I'll implement the plan I've laid out since March to beat COVID-19. I'll listen to scientists and experts; protect our families; and make testing, treatment, and any eventual vaccine free and available to everyone. I'll get right to work building our economy back better – getting real relief out to millions of hard-hit small businesses. They're the lifeblood of our communities – but Trump's corrupt recovery passed them by, funneling funds to big corporations instead. Some 75% of Asian-owned small businesses weren't expected to get any first-round stimulus funds at all. It's wrong. I've called for ensuring small businesses with less than 50 employees get new relief funds. And I'll boost their long-term access to credit and capital, and work to ease the language barriers that can hold back immigrant entrepreneurs. Through it all, my economic recovery plan will reward work, not just wealth, creating millions of good paying jobs of the future. Independent economists at Moody's found that my plan creates 7 million more jobs – and $1 trillion more in economic growth – than President Trump's would. And I won't raise taxes on anyone earning less than $400,000 a year – period. Instead, I'll make sure the super wealthy and big corporations finally pay their fair share. I've fought my whole career for working and middle class families – so many of them hard-working immigrants who came to America in search of a better life. I'll help parents afford a quality education for their kids, boosting teacher pay and making public college free for most families. I'll make it easier to care for aging parents, and make health care more affordable. Trump is in court right now trying to repeal the Affordable Care Act, stripping tens of millions of people of health coverage in the middle of a deadly pandemic. It makes no sense. Meanwhile, COVID-19 is proof that the United States can't isolate itself from the world. We have to work with other nations to meet global challenges that impact us all, starting by rebuilding our relationships with our closest partners. We're a Pacific power, and we'll stand with friends and allies to advance our shared prosperity, security, and values in the Asia-Pacific region. That includes deepening our ties with Taiwan, a leading democracy, major economy, technology powerhouse – and a shining example of how an open society can effectively contain COVID-19. And our approach to China will focus on boosting American competitiveness, revitalizing our strengths at home, and renewing our alliances and leadership abroad. We'll work to collaborate with China when it's in our interest, including on public health and climate change. America has always led the world not only with the example of our power, but the power of our example. To truly do that again, we also have to fix our broken immigration system, keeping families together and ensuring the United States continues to draw the world's best and brightest. I'm running to build America back better, as a country of opportunity, unity, and new beginnings. A place made strong by generations of immigrants. A place where everyone has a voice and every vote counts. I'll lead on these issues, and more importantly, I'll listen. So please make sure you get your vote in today. Together we'll restore the soul of this nation we love. #福編編譯? (編譯個鬼，是世界日報了不起！大內宣與遍地綠媒鬼遮眼)

9 人回報・1 則回應・6 年前

(newspaper)［5/2 17:45] 宋斐洛: “有關Covid19的最新消息。看來這種疾病正在全世界範圍內受到攻擊。由於意大利人進行的屍檢……已證明它不是肺炎……但它是：彌散性血管內凝血（血栓形成）。因此，抗藥性的方法是使用抗生素，抗病毒藥，抗炎藥和抗凝劑。自中午以來，這裡的協議正在更改！根據意大利病理學家提供的寶貴信息，不再需要呼吸機和重症監護室。如果在所有情況下都是如此，我們將比預期的早解決此問題。有關Coranovirus的重要和新功能：在全球範圍內，由於嚴重的病理生理診斷錯誤，COVID-19被錯誤地攻擊。記錄在案的一個令人印象深刻的案例是，一個墨西哥家庭在美國聲稱自己已經通過家庭療法治癒了：將三份500毫克阿司匹林溶於蜂蜜煮沸的檸檬汁中，趁熱服用。第二天他們醒來，好像他們什麼都沒發生！好吧，下面的科學信息證明它們是正確的！該信息由來自意大利的醫學研究員發布：得益於對死於COVID-19的患者進行的50次屍檢，意大利病理學家嚴格地說，它不是肺炎，因為該病毒不僅會殺死這種類型的肺細胞，而且會利用炎症性風暴造成內皮血管血栓形成。如同彌散性血管內凝血一樣，肺部受到的影響最大，因為它最發炎，但也有心髒病，中風和許多其他血栓栓塞性疾病。實際上，該方案使抗病毒治療無效，而集中在抗炎和抗凝血治療上。這些療法應立即進行，即使在家中也應如此，對患者的治療效果很好。後者表現較差。在復蘇時，它們幾乎沒有用。如果中國人譴責它，他們將投資家庭療法，而不是重症監護！彌散性血管內凝血（血栓形成）：因此，與之抗爭的方法是使用抗生素，抗炎藥和抗凝劑。一位意大利病理學家報告說，貝加莫醫院共進行了50例屍檢，米蘭進行了20例屍檢，也就是說，意大利系列是世界上最高的，中國人只有3例，這似乎完全證實了這一信息。簡而言之，這種疾病是由病毒觸發的彌散性血管內凝血所決定的。因此，它不是肺炎而是肺血栓形成，這是主要的診斷錯誤。我們將重症監護病房中的複蘇場所數量增加了一倍，而不必要的費用過高。回想起來，我們必須重新考慮一個月前討論過的被稱為間質性肺炎的胸部X線檢查；實際上，這可能與彌散性血管內凝血完全一致。如果不能首先解決血栓栓塞，在ICU中的治療是無用的。如果我們使血液不流通的肺通氣，那是沒有用的，實際上，十（10）名患者中有九（9）名患者死亡。因為問題是心血管問題，而不是呼吸問題。決定死亡率的是靜脈微血栓形成而不是肺炎。為什麼形成血栓❓ 因為根據文獻，炎症通過複雜但眾所周知的病理生理機制誘發血栓形成。不幸的是，直到3月中旬為止，科學文獻（尤其是中文文獻）都說不應使用抗炎藥。現在，像流感一樣，在意大利使用的療法是使用抗炎藥和抗生素，並且住院病人的數量已經減少。許多死亡，即使在40多歲時，都有10至15天的發燒史，沒有得到適當的治療。炎症造成了大量的組織損傷，並形成了血栓形成的根源，因為主要問題不是病毒，而是破壞安裝病毒的細胞的免疫反應過度。實際上，類風濕關節炎患者無需接受ICU，因為他們正在接受皮質類固醇激素療法，這是一種很好的消炎藥。這是意大利住院人數減少並成為家庭可治療疾病的主要原因。通過在家中對她進行良好的治療，不僅可以避免住院，而且可以避免血栓形成的風險。這不容易理解，因為微栓塞的跡象消失了！有了這一重要發現，就可以立即隔離，恢復正常生活並進行隔離交易，但現在是發布此數據的時候了，以便每個國家的衛生當局分別對這些信息和數據進行分析。防止進一步的死亡。無用！疫苗可能以後再來。現在我們可以等待。截至今天，在意大利，協議正在發生變化。根據來自意大利病理學家的寶貴信息，不需要呼吸機和重症監護室。因此，我們需要重新考慮投資以正確應對這種疾病。 Nãohá（通過自動設備翻譯）。緊急發布！ ” 轉發如收到 [5/2 17:46] 宋斐洛: "Latest news about Covid19. It seems that the disease is being attacked worldwide. Thanks to autopsies performed by the Italians ... it has been shown that it is not pneumonia ... but it is: disseminated intravascular coagulation (thrombosis). Therefore, the way to fight it is with antibiotics, antivirals, anti-inflammatories and anticoagulants. The protocols are being changed here since noon! According to valuable information from Italian pathologists, ventilators and intensive care units were never needed. If this is true for all cases, we are about to resolve it earlier than expected. Important and new about Coranovirus: Around the world, COVID-19 is being attacked wrongly due to a serious pathophysiological diagnosis error. The impressive case of a Mexican family in the United States who claimed they were cured with a home remedy was documented: three 500 mg aspirins dissolved in lemon juice boiled with honey, taken hot. The next day they woke up as if nothing had happened to them! Well, the scientific information that follows proves they are right! This information was released by a medical researcher from Italy: Thanks to 50 autopsies performed on patients who died of COVID-19, Italian pathologists have discovered that IT IS NOT PNEUMONIA, strictly speaking, because the virus does not only kill pneumocytes of this type, but uses an inflammatory storm to create an endothelial vascular thrombosis. As in disseminated intravascular coagulation, the lung is the most affected because it is the most inflamed, but there is also a heart attack, stroke and many other thromboembolic diseases. In fact, the protocols left antiviral therapies useless and focused on anti-inflammatory and anti-clotting therapies. These therapies should be done immediately, even at home, in which the treatment of patients responds very well. The later performed less effective. In resuscitation, they are almost useless. If the Chinese had denounced it, they would have invested in home therapy, not intensive care! DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION (THROMBOSIS): So, the way to fight it is with antibiotics, anti-inflammatories and anticoagulants. An Italian pathologist reports that the hospital in Bergamo did a total of 50 autopsies and one in Milan, 20, that is, the Italian series is the highest in the world, the Chinese did only 3, which seems to fully confirm the information. Previously, in a nutshell, the disease is determined by a disseminated intravascular coagulation triggered by the virus; therefore, it is not pneumonia but pulmonary thrombosis, a major diagnostic error. We doubled the number of resuscitation places in the ICU, with unnecessary exorbitant costs. In retrospect, we have to rethink those chest X-rays that were discussed a month ago and were given as interstitial pneumonia; in fact, it may be entirely consistent with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Treatment in ICUs is useless if thromboembolism is not resolved first. If we ventilate a lung where blood does not circulate, it is useless, in fact, nine (9) patients out of ten (10) die. Because the problem is cardiovascular, not respiratory. It is venous microthrombosis, not pneumonia, that determines mortality. Why thrombi are formed❓ Because inflammation, according to the literature, induces thrombosis through a complex but well-known pathophysiological mechanism. Unfortunately what the scientific literature said, especially Chinese, until mid-March was that anti-inflammatory drugs should not be used. Now, the therapy being used in Italy is with anti-inflammatories and antibiotics, as in influenza, and the number of hospitalized patients has been reduced. Many deaths, even in their 40s, had a history of fever for 10 to 15 days, which were not treated properly. The inflammation did a great deal of tissue damage and created ground for thrombus formation, because the main problem is not the virus, but the immune hyperreaction that destroys the cell where the virus is installed. In fact, patients with rheumatoid arthritis have never needed to be admitted to the ICU because they are on corticosteroid therapy, which is a great anti-inflammatory. This is the main reason why hospitalizations in Italy are decreasing and becoming a treatable disease at home. By treating her well at home, not only is hospitalization avoided, but also the risk of thrombosis. It was not easy to understand, because the signs of microembolism disappeared! With this important discovery, it is possible to return to normal life and open closed deals due to the quarantine, not immediately, but it is time to publish this data, so that the health authorities of each country make their respective analysis of this information and prevent further deaths. useless! The vaccine may come later. Now we can wait. In Italy, as of today, protocols are changing. According to valuable information from Italian pathologists, ventilators and intensive care units are not necessary. Therefore, we need to rethink investments to properly deal with this disease. Não há (Translation by automatic device). LET'S PUBLISH URGENTLY! " Forwarded as received

1 人回報・1 則回應・6 年前

美國情報單位前人員與美國媒體的訪談中譯：邁克·惠特尼對前中央情報局 (CIA) 和國務院反恐辦公室資深人士拉里·約翰遜的採訪 Larry C. Johnson：「The Ukrainian Army Has Been Defeated. What's Left Is Mop-Up.」 The Unz Review 問題1：能解釋一下為什麼您認為俄羅斯正在贏得在烏克蘭的戰爭？拉里·C·約翰遜：俄羅斯在烏克蘭開展軍事行動的最初24小時內，烏克蘭的所有地面對空警戒雷達都被消滅了。沒有這些雷達，烏克蘭空軍就失去了進行空對空攔截的能力。在之後的三周內，俄羅斯在烏克蘭上空建立了事實上的禁飛區。雖然仍然容易受到美國和北約向烏克蘭提供的肩射防空導彈的攻擊，但沒有證據表明俄羅斯因此削減空中作戰行動。俄羅斯在入侵後三天內抵達基輔也引起了我的關注。我記得納粹在巴巴羅薩行動中花了七周時間到達基輔，又花了七周時間才能征服這座城市。納粹的優勢在於它並不需要避免平民傷亡，並且急於摧毀關鍵基礎設施。然而，許多所謂的美國軍事專家卻聲稱俄羅斯陷入了困境。當一個24英里(或40英里，取決於新聞來源)的車隊位於基輔以北超過一周時，顯然烏克蘭對其發動重大軍事行動的能力已被消除。如果他們的火炮完好無損，那麼該縱隊很容易遭受大規模損失，但那沒有發生。或者，如果烏克蘭人擁有可用的固定翼攻擊機或武裝直升機，他們可以從空中摧毀該縱隊，但那沒有發生。再或者，如果他們有可用的巡航導彈打擊能力，他們應該對據稱停滯不前的俄羅斯縱隊發動毀滅性打擊，但那沒有發生。烏克蘭人甚至沒有用美國新提供給他們的標槍反坦克導彈對縱隊進行大規模步兵伏擊。俄羅斯打擊的規模和範圍是驚人的。他們在三周內佔領了比英國本土還大的領土。然後，他們開始對主要城市和軍事設施進行有針對性的打擊。我們還沒有看到一個烏克蘭團或旅級單位擊敗俄羅斯同級單位的例子。相反，俄國人將烏克蘭軍隊分割成碎片，切斷了他們的通訊線路。俄國人正在鞏固他們對馬里烏波爾的控制，並確保了黑海的所有通道。烏克蘭目前南部和北部聯繫被切斷了。需要指出的是，美國2003年在伊拉克奪取這麼多領土時遇到了更艱難的處境，同時與之交戰的是一支遠遜於美軍、作戰能力較弱的軍隊。如果有可能的話，俄羅斯的這次行動應該會嚇壞美國軍事和政治領導人。本週真正的重大消息來自於，俄羅斯導彈打擊了北約在亞沃里夫和日托米爾的基地。北約於2018年9月在日托米爾進行了網絡安全培訓，並將烏克蘭描述為「北約夥伴」。星期六，日托米爾被高超音速導彈摧毀。上周日，雅沃里夫遭遇了類似的命運。它是北約和歐盟司令部用來向烏克蘭提供戰鬥機和武器的主要訓練和後勤中心。該基地的大量軍事和文職人員傷亡。自2015年以來俄羅斯不僅定期打擊和摧毀北約使用的基地，而且事前不發出警告，事後也不停止此類導彈攻擊。問題2：為什麼媒體試圖說服烏克蘭人民相信他們可以在與俄羅斯的戰爭中獲勝？如果您說的正確，那麼所有被派去與俄羅斯軍隊作戰的平民都將死於一場他們無法獲勝的戰爭。我不明白為什麼媒體要在如此嚴重的事情上誤導人們。您對此事有何看法？拉里·C·約翰遜：這是無知和惰性的結合。絕大多數媒體(印刷和電子)以及大型科技公司都在支持大規模的宣傳活動，而不是進行真實的報道。我還記得他們說喬治·W·布什是希特勒的時候，以及唐納德特朗普是希特勒的時候。現在我們有了新的希特勒，弗拉基米爾·普京。這是一本用爛了的、失敗的劇本。任何敢於提出合理問題的人都會立即被貶為普京傀儡或俄羅斯走狗。當你不能爭辯事實時，唯一的辦法就是罵人。問題3：上周，道格拉斯·麥格雷戈上校作為塔克·卡爾森秀的嘉賓。他對戰爭的看法與您驚人地相似。以下是他在採訪中談到的：「對烏克蘭人來說戰爭真的結束了。毫無疑問他們已被磨成碎片，儘管我們從主流媒體那裡聽到了些什麼。但現階段對我們來說真正的問題是，塔克，我們要麼與俄羅斯人民和他們的政府某求共存，要麼繼續追求這種偽裝成烏克蘭戰爭的政權更迭？我們是否要停止目前這種使用烏克蘭作為打擊莫斯科的攻城槌的做法。」您同意麥格雷戈的觀點，即煽動俄烏開戰的真正目的是「政權更迭」嗎？第二，您是否同意烏克蘭淪為了美國隊俄羅斯實施代理人戰爭的舞台？拉里·C·約翰遜：道格是偉大的分析家，但我不同意他的觀點——我認為拜登政府中沒有足夠聰明的人，能夠以這些戰略術語進行思考和規劃。在我看來，過去七年北約一直遵循著某種慣性。北約和華盛頓相信，他們可以貼著俄羅斯邊境向東蠕動，而不會引發任何反應。北約和歐盟司令部定期舉行演習，包括提供進攻性訓練和裝備。我相信有關中央情報局正在為頓巴斯地區行動的烏克蘭軍隊提供准軍事訓練的報道是可信的。但我很難相信，在遭遇伊拉克和阿富汗失敗後，我們突然有了孫子級別的戰略家在華盛頓運籌帷幄。華盛頓有一種絕望的氣氛。除了試圖制裁俄羅斯的一切東西外，拜登政府還試圖壓制中國、印度和沙特阿拉伯。我沒有看到這些國家中的任何一個陷入困境。我相信拜登的工作人員試圖妖魔化俄羅斯的所有事物和所有人時犯了一個致命的錯誤。如果有可能的話，這會促使俄羅斯人民團結在普京背後，他們將為長期鬥爭做好準備。我對錯誤地認為對俄羅斯的經濟制裁會使他們屈服的觀點感到震驚。事實與之相反，俄羅斯可以自給自足，不依賴進口，而它的出口對西方經濟福祉至關重要。如果他們中斷向西方出口小麥、鉀肥、天然氣、石油、鈀、成品鎳和其他關鍵礦產，歐洲和美國的經濟將受到重創。而這種以制裁來脅迫俄羅斯的企圖，現在使得美元作為國際儲備貨幣的角色很可能會被扔進歷史的垃圾箱。問題4：自2007年在慕尼黑髮表著名演講以來，普京一直在抱怨「全球安全框架」。我們可以看到在烏克蘭這些麻煩的安全問題如何演變成一場全面戰爭。如你所知，在去年12月，普京提出了多項關於俄羅斯安全問題的要求，但拜登政府對此置之不理，從未作出回應。普京希望得到書面保證，即北約的擴張將不包括烏克蘭(成員資格)，並且核導彈不會部署到羅馬尼亞或波蘭。您認為普京的要求是否合理？拉里·C·約翰遜：我認為普京的要求相當合理。問題在於，99%的美國人不知道過去七年北約和美國進行了怎樣的軍事挑釁。公眾總是被告知軍事演習是「防禦性的」。這根本不是真的。現在有消息說 DTRA正在資助烏克蘭的生物實驗室。如果拜登允許在古巴、委內瑞拉和墨西哥部署類似的俄羅斯系統，我猜普京可能會同意在波蘭和羅馬尼亞部署美國的核導彈系統。當我們從這些角度看待問題時，我們能夠開始理解普京的要求既不瘋狂也不無理。問題5：俄羅斯媒體報道稱，俄羅斯「空射高精度」導彈襲擊了烏克蘭西部的一處設施，「造成 100 多名當地士兵和外國雇傭軍死亡」。很明顯，特種作戰訓練中心位於距離波蘭邊境僅15英里的奧夫魯赫鎮附近。關於這次事件，您能告訴我們什麼？俄羅斯是否試圖向北約傳遞信息？拉里·C·約翰遜：簡短的回答——是的！過去一周，俄羅斯對烏克蘭西部的軍事打擊令北約官員感到驚慌失措。第一次打擊發生在3月13日星期日，在烏克蘭的亞沃里夫。俄羅斯用幾枚導彈襲擊了該基地，據報道有些是高超音速導彈。超過200人喪生，其中包括美國和英國的軍事和情報人員，另有數百人受傷。許多人遭受了諸如截肢之類的災難性創傷，並在住院治療。然而，北約和西方媒體對報道這場災難幾乎沒有興趣。亞沃里夫是北約的重要前沿基地(見這裡)。直到2月份(在俄羅斯入侵烏克蘭之前)，美國第7軍訓練司令部在雅沃里夫運作到2月中旬。俄羅斯並沒有就此止步。ASB 軍事新聞報道俄羅斯襲擊了位於亞沃里夫東南 60英里處傑利亞廷的另一個地點(我認為是星期四)。昨天，俄羅斯又襲擊了位於日托米爾的北約先前使用的一處地點。普京發出了一個非常明確的信息——現階段在烏克蘭的北約部隊將被視為戰鬥人員。問題6：烏克蘭總統澤連斯基被西方媒體譽為「戰時領袖」和現代「溫斯頓·丘吉爾」。媒體沒有告訴讀者的是，澤連斯基已經採取了一些措施來加強他對權力的控制，同時破壞了烏克蘭脆弱的民主制度。例如，澤連斯基「取締了11個反對派所屬的新聞機構」，並試圖以虛假的「資助恐怖主義」罪名阻止烏克蘭最大反對黨領導人維克托·梅德韋丘克競選公職。這不是一個認真致力於民主的領導人的行為。您對澤連斯基怎麼看？他真的是媒體所說的「愛國領袖」嗎？拉里·C·約翰遜：澤連斯基是一名喜劇演員。在我看來，這不是一個很好的人選。西方玩世不恭地利用他是猶太人的事實來轉移對規模龐大的新納粹組織的注意力(我需要指出的是，真正的納粹分子仍然在慶祝烏克蘭武裝黨衛軍在二戰中為納粹作戰的成就)。事實很清楚——他正在取締反對黨並關閉反對派媒體。我想這就是「民主」的新定義。問題7：這會如何結束？阿拉巴馬之月網站上有一篇很棒的帖子，標題是「烏克蘭戰爭的地理停戰狀態將是什麼」。這篇文章的作者伯納德似乎認為，烏克蘭最終將被沿著第聶伯河「和向南沿著俄羅斯族人口佔多數的海岸」分割。他還這樣說：「這將消除烏克蘭進入黑海的通道，並建立一座通往受俄羅斯保護的德涅斯特河左岸的陸地通道。烏克蘭的其他地區將成為一個土地封閉的，農業為主的國家，解除武裝，而且太窮，無法在短期內對俄羅斯構成新的威脅。在政治上，它被來自加利西亞的法西斯主義者主導，這將成為歐盟的一個主要問題。」您對此怎麼看？普京是否會為了加強俄羅斯的安全並結束敵對行動而將自己的領土解決方案強加給烏克蘭，還是更有可能出現不同的情況？拉里·C·約翰遜：我同意這個的觀點。普京的主要目標是保護俄羅斯免受外國威脅並與西方脫離關係。俄羅斯擁有成為獨立自主國家的物質資源，並且正在實現這一願景。

4 人回報・1 則回應・4 年前

真的假的

訊息原文

現有回應

增加新回應

你可能也會對這些類似文章有興趣